3DMark 06
|
|
Score |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
11015 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
9326 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
9311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00 |
|
|
SM2 Score – GT1 |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
40,514 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
33,787 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
30,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
SM2 Score – GT2 |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
43,344 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
35,949 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
34,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
HDR/SM3 Score – HDR1 |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
41,949 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
38,649 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
35,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
HDR/SM3 Score – HDR2 |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
50,598 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
45,805 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
39,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Fill Rate – Single Texturing |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
5815,878 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
5250,212 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
3362,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
10 |
00 |
20 |
00 |
30 |
00 |
40 |
00 |
50 |
00 |
60 |
|
00 |
|
|
Fill Rate – Multi Texturing |
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
19173,84 |
|
|
|
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
16522,32 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
10602,09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
50 |
00 |
10 |
000 |
15 |
000 |
200 |
|
00 |
|
|
Pixel Shader |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
345,765 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
345,696 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
308,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Vertex Shader – Simple |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
3080,24 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
233,926 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
225,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00 |
|
|
Vertex Shader – Complex |
ATi 3850 256MB |
159,572 |
|
|
|
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
145,616 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
134,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Shader Particles (SM 3) |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
108,885 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
83,752 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
67,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Perlin Noise (SM3) |
ATi 3850 256MB |
149,442 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS 384MB |
111,724 |
|
|
|
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
103,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Zanimljivo je primjetiti kako je ATi-ev model u gotovo svim
testovima lagano ispred 8800GS-ice. Što bi tek bilo da smo imali 512MB model?
No poznato je kako 3D Mark malo više "voli" ATi-a.
LightsMark 2007
|
|
1280×1024 (4xAA, 16xAF) |
Asus 8800GS @ OC |
123,3 |
|
|
|
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
115,3 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS |
104,9 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
65,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
1680×1050 (4xAA, 16xAF) |
Asus 8800GS @ OC |
100,6 |
|
|
|
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
94,4 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS |
85,1 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
58,1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
U ovom testu ATi-eva kartica drastično zaostaje. Dobar overclocking
8800GS modela donio nam je prednost čak i pred tvornički OC-anom 9600GT karticom.
Nije loše.
Test koji pokazuje kako više memorije i šira sabirnica daju
veliki boost u DX10 performansama. Ni overclocking tu ne pomaže previše.
COH Opposing Fronts
|
|
1280×1024 DX9 (4xAA, 16xAF) |
Asus 8800GS @ OC |
59 |
|
|
|
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
58 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
57,9 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS |
55,7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
1680×1050 DX9 (4xAA, 16xAF) |
Asus 8800GS @ OC |
57,8 |
|
|
|
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
56,9 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS |
53,5 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
52,3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
1280×1024 DX10 (4xAA, 16xAF) |
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
38,5 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS @ OC |
37,4 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
33,2 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
1680×1050 DX10 (4xAA, 16xAF) |
Asus 8800GS @ OC |
27,9 |
|
|
|
Zotac 9600GT 512MB AMP |
27,9 |
|
|
|
ATi 3850 256MB |
24,8 |
|
|
|
Asus 8800GS |
24,1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
Overclocking pomaže 8800GS-ici da u ovom testu preskoči ATi-evog
konkurenta, bez toga 3850 je brži. Ukoliko ovaj naslov odlučite igrati u DX9,
sve testirane kartice su dovoljne za solidnu igrivost.