Recenzija – BaB Snow Samurai w. Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Datum objave 16.06.2022 - Krešimir Matanović
BaB Snow Samurai w. Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- 1x CCD s 8 aktivnih jezgri s podrškom za 16 threadova (niti)
- 3,4 GHz osnovni takt
- 4,5 GHz deklarirani 2 core boost takt
- 105 W TDP
- 24 PCIe 4.0 stazice
- 96 MB L3 memorije (3D V-cache)
- 8x 512KB (4 MB) L2 memorije (8-way)
- 8x 32 KB L1 instrukcijske memorije (8-way)
- 8x 32 KB L1 podatkovne memorije (8-way)
- SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3,SHA
- Broj tranzistora: oko 4.15 milijarde po CCD-u, i 2.09 milijardi u I/O-u (IoD-u)
- Površina jezgri: 80.7 kvadratnih milimetara za CCD, 125 kvadratnih milimetara za CoD
- Litografija: 7nm za CCD (površina 74 mm kvadratnih), 12nm za IOD (površina 125 mm kvadratnih)
- Preporučena cijena: 449 USD
Rezultati testiranja - prvi dio
CPU testovi
Blender [ichart headers="ID, Time (s)" title="Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)" labels="Core i9-12900K,Ryzen 9 5950X,Ryzen 9 3950X,Core i5-12600K,Ryzen 9 5900X,Ryzen 9 3900XT,Ryzen 9 3900X,Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Core i9-10850K,Ryzen 7 5700X,Ryzen 7 5800X,Ryzen 7 3800XT,Core i7-10700K,Ryzen R7 3700X,Ryzen 7 2700X,Ryzen 5 5600X,i7-8700K,Core i3-12100F,Ryzen 7 1800X,Ryzen 7 2700,Core i5-10600K,Ryzen 5 3600X,Core i5-10400,Ryzen 5 2600X,i7-7800X,Core i5-10500,Ryzen 5 2600,i5-8600K" values="88.72,116.49,121.84,139.65,143.12,156.62,157.37,162.36,172.34,188.41,201.36,202.42,218.38,232.95,264.82,271.89,283.41,285.91,299.64,301.5,301.74,312.96,342.96,344.84,355.05,357.47,366.65,406.55" colors="blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,red,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue" height="1200"] U Blenderu čini se dodatnih 64 MB priručne memorije puno znači pa je procesor po performansama u rangu sa Ryzenom 9 3900X koji je 12C/24T procesor! Cinebench R20 [ichart headers="ID, CPU (pts)" title="Cinebench 20 nT" labels="Core i9-12900K,Ryzen 9 5950X,Ryzen 9 3950X,Ryzen 9 5900X,Ryzen 9 3900XT,Ryzen 9 3900X,Core i5-10600K,Core i9-10850K,Ryzen 7 5800X,Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Ryzen 7 3800XT,Core i7-10700K,Ryzen 7 5700X,Ryzen 7 3700X,Ryzen 5 5600X,Ryzen 7 2700X,Core i5-10600K,Core i7-8700K,Ryzen 5 3600X,Core i3-12100F,Core i5-10400,Core i5-10500,Ryzen 3 3300X,Ryzen 3 3100" values="10409,10035,9265,8380,7302,7237,6680,6164,6001,5757,5123,4936,4928,4916,4351,3857,3592,3408,3369,3265,3147,3055,2583,2340" colors="blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,red,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue" height="900"] [ichart headers="ID, CPU (pts)" title="Cinebench 20 1T" labels="Core i9-12900K,Core i5-12600K,Ryzen 9 5950X,Core i3-12100F,Ryzen 9 5900X,Ryzen 7 5800X,Ryzen 5 5600X,Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Ryzen 7 5700X,Ryzen 9 3900XT,Core i7-10700K,Core i9-10850K" values="744,724,640,629,628,624,595,583,543,518,512,507" colors="blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,red,blue,blue,blue,blue" height="600"] U starijem Cinebenchu je 5800X3D nešto sporiji od 5800X te dosta brži od 5700X. Cinebench R23 [ichart headers="ID, CPU (pts)" title="Cinebench 23 nT" labels="Core i9-12900K,Ryzen 9 5950X,Core i5-12600K,Ryzen 7 5800X,Core i9-10850K,Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Ryzen 7 5700X,Ryzen 5 5600X,Core i3-12100F" values="27259,23653,17491,15349,15175,14818,12652,10218,8490" colors="blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,red,blue,blue,blue" height="500"] [ichart headers="ID, CPU (pts)" title="Cinebench 23 1T" labels="Core i9-12900K,Core i5-12600K,Ryzen 7 5800X,Ryzen 9 5950X,Core i3-12100F,Ryzen 5 5600X,Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Ryzen 7 5700X,Core i9-10850K" values="1988,1861,1596,1583,1582,1529,1459,1443,1278" colors="blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,red,blue,blue" height="500"] U novijem Cinebenchu je situacija slična, a jedino je podbacio u 1T testu gdje je bliže 5700X-u. Corona 1.3 [ichart headers="ID, Time (s)" title="Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)" labels="Ryzen 9 5950X,Ryzen 9 5900X,Core i9-12900K,Ryzen 9 3950X,Ryzen 9 3900X,Ryzen 9 3900XT,Core i9-10850K,Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Core i5-12600K,Ryzen 7 5800X,Core i7-10700K,Ryzen 7 5700X,Ryzen 7 3800XT,Ryzen 7 3700X,Ryzen 7 2700X,Ryzen 5 5600X,Core i5-10600K,Core i7-8700K,Ryzen 5 3600X,Core i5-10500,Core i5-10400,Core i3-12100F,Ryzen 3 3300X,Ryzen 3 3100" values="47,58,59,61,72,72,76,83,90,92,96,101,104,112,118,123,134,141,144,146,148,172,202,233" colors="blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,red,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue" height="800"] U ovom je testu opet nešto brži od 5800X-am i očito je da mu ovi render poslovi odgovaraju, tj. aplikacije znaju iskoristiti dodatnu priručnu memoriju. Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p [ichart headers="ID, CPU (average fps)" title="Handbrake" htitle="4K H.264 mkv to mp4 (average fps)" labels="Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Ryzen 9 5950X,Ryzen 7 5800X,Core i9-10850K,Ryzen 7 5700X,Ryzen 5 5600X,Core i9-12900K,Core i3-12100F,Core i5-12600K" values="86.29,57.2,49.38,49.16,43.88,38.64,35.3,32.28,18.4" colors="red,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue" height="500"] Još jedan test u kojem 5800X3D rastura. Hanbrake čini se dobro koristi sav taj L3 keš! JetStream 2 [ichart headers="ID, Time (s)" title="JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)" labels="Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Core i3-12100F,Core i9-12900K,Ryzen 7 5800X,Ryzen 9 5950X,Ryzen 9 5900X,Ryzen 5 5600X,Core i9-10850K,Core i7-10700K,Ryzen 9 3900X,Ryzen 7 3800XT,Ryzen 9 3900XT,Ryzen 3 3300X,Core i5-12600K,Core i5-10600K,Ryzen 7 5700X,Core i5-10500,Core i7-8700K,Core i5-10400,Ryzen 3 3100" values="236.452,230.373,229.982,204.78,198.742,195.904,192.449,176.918,161.32,156,154.69,152.847,149.55,149.33,148.66,147.66,141.54,140.77,137.226,127.09" colors="red,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue" height="800"] JetStream 2 je browser benchmark koji se fokusira na web aplikacije, koji kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. Opet je 5800X3D na vrhu! V-Ray [ichart headers="ID, Score (ksamples)" title="V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)" labels="Core i9-12900K,Ryzen 9 5950X,Core i5-12600K,Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Ryzen 7 5800X,Core i9-10850K,Ryzen 7 5700X,Ryzen 5 5600X,Core i3-12100F" values="27559,27384,17516,17432,17040,16808,14436,11589,9400" colors="blue,blue,blue,red,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue" height="600"] Ovdje je 5800X3D u rangu s 5800X procesorom. wPrime 2.0 [ichart headers="ID, Time (s)" title="wPrime 2.0" htitle="1024M Time (s, manje je bolje)" labels="Ryzen Threadripper 3970X,Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX,Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX,Ryzen 9 3950X,Ryzen 9 5950X,Ryzen Threadripper 2950X,Core i9-12900K,Threadripper 1950X,Ryzen Threadripper 2920X,Ryzen 9 3900X,Ryzen 9 3900XT,Ryzen 9 5900X,Threadripper 1920X,Core i9-10850K,i7-6950X,Core i5-12600K,Ryzen 7 3800XT,Ryzen R7 3700X,Core i7-10700K,Ryzen 7 5800X,Ryzen 7 2700X,Ryzen 7 5800X3D,Ryzen 7 1800X,Ryzen 7 5700X,i7-8700K,Ryzen 7 1700X,Ryzen 7 2700,i7-5960X,Ryzen 5 3600X,Ryzen 5 5600X,Ryzen 7 1700,Core i5-10600K,i7-7800X,Ryzen 5 2600X,Ryzen 5 2600,i7-4960X,Core i5-10500,Core i5-10400,i7-3960X,i7-5930K,Ryzen 5 1600X,i7-5820K,Ryzen 5 1600,i7-3930K,Core i3-12100F,Ryzen 3 3300X,i5-8600K,i7-7700K,i7-6700K,i7-4790K,Ryzen 3 3100,i7-4770K,i7-3770K,Ryzen 5 1500X,i7-2600K,Ryzen 5 1400,FX-8150" values="23.91,31.56,38.556,42.36,45.9,49.234,52.179,54.145,56.142,56.412,56.456,59.96,62.553,67.975,69.205,79.67,80.08,82.79,85.27,86.58,86.854,90.438,95.624,97.32,103.919,106.855,108.265,110.626,113.335,116.435,116.929,118.65,121.355,126.153,126.752,129.637,131.25,133.254,135.127,135.435,136.293,138.705,140.245,149.89,157.223,158.55,164.566,167.364,175.439,176.008,178.347,186.468,195.174,198.092,213.481,225,237.491" colors="blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,red,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue,blue" height="1600"] I za kraj ovaj ogromni graf u kojem vidimo različite tipove procesora iz dosta generacija unazad. Ovdje je 5800X3D točno između 5700X i 5800X.Rezultati testiranja - drugi dio
Zaključak
Tko god odluči graditi računalo namijenjeno igranju oko Ryzena 7 5800X3D donio je pravu odluku! Ovo čudovište s 96 MB L3 priručne memorije trenutno je najbolji igraći procesor na svijetu. U našem ste testu mogli vidjeti usporedbu s 12900K, no prema recezentima širom weba samljeo je i bržega 12900KS, da ne spominjemo razliku u cijeni. Uz to, ima nešto jeftiniju platformu pa je i konačna cijena niža.
Uz ovaj procesor možete kombinirati i najbrže AMD i Nvidia grafičke kartice, a u racunala.hr su se odlučili za brzu ASUS TUF RX 6900 XT koja sasvim solidno može poslužiti i za 4K igranje. I ostatak je priče solidan - Arcticovo dobro AIO hlađenje, poštena količina radne memorije adekvatne brzine, zatim dobro napajanje, te vrlo dobar diskovni podsustav. Sve je upakirano u Deepcoolovo CK560 kućište koje je dovoljno prostrano, dobro provjetreno i dobro filtrirano. Kućište je moderno, kvalitetno i zapravo kao stvoreno za ovakav moćan stroj. Procesor se nešto više zagrijava, no to je zbog njegove konstrukcije i tu možemo zaboraviti niže radne temperature i s jačim hladnjacima. No, ono što je za svaku pohvalu je da je ovo računalo pod punim opterećenjem vrlo tiho.
BaB Snow Samurai je dobro osmišljeno i složeno računalo koje košta 24.776,66 kuna. Za gotovinu odobravaju 10% popusta, a za čitatelje PCEksperta je dostupan i poseban popust od dodatnih 10% uz kod RACUNALAPCEKSPERT. Na lageru su dostupna tri ovakva računala, pa požurite.