ADATA XPG SX8200 480 GB & SU650 240 GB recenzija

· · Mediji · Stranica 3 od 5

Rezultati testova – prvi dio

PCMark8

Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB559,6Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB500,2ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB467,8Kingston KC1000 480GB432,7Samsung SM951 256GB @ 2x PCIe365,4ADATA SX8000 512GB338,8Intel SSD 750 400GB317,9Samsung 850 EVO 500GB295,7Crucial MX100 512GB292,6Intel DC S3500 480GB284,7ADATA SU800 256GB276,6Samsung 850 PRO 256GB277,4OCZ Vertex 460 240GB256,2OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB239,2Corsair Force LX 256GB234,0Transcend SSD370 256GB227,0Transcend SSD370 512GB224,0OCZ Vector 150 120GB216,3OCZ Vertex 450 256GB214,1AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB213,5OCZ ARC 100 240 GB205,4OCZ Vertex 4 256GB198,7Transcend SSD370 128GB198,2takeMS UTX-PO318 120GB180,7Corsair Force 3 128GB123,90600

PCMark u Storage testu simulira aktivnost diska snimljenu tijekom prave upotrebe aplikacija iz Adobeovog Creative Suite-a i Microsoftovog Office-a, te dvije igre – WoW i Battlefield 3. Na temelju izvršenih mjerenja performansi donosi rezultat u MB/s. SX8200 se ovdje smjestio između Patriotovog Hellfire-a i Kingstonovog KC1000 i najavio žestoku bitku. Za SU650 nismo uspjeli izmjeriti performanse u ovome testu iz nepoznatog razloga.

AIDA64 Read

Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB2.674,5Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB2.667,2ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB2.553,9Intel SSD 750 400GB2.000,0OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB2.000,0Kingston KC1000 480GB1.765,3ADATA SX8000 512GB1.635,6Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe1.536,9Samsung SM951 256GB @ 2x PCIe740,5Asus Hyper Express 256GB644,1OCZ Vector 256GB540,7OCZ Vector 150 120GB540,7Corsair Force LX 256GB539,8Samsung 850 EVO 500GB534,7Samsung 850 PRO 256GB539,8AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB526,1OCZ ARC 100 240 GB525,8ADATA SU650 240 GB525,6Transcend SSD370 128GB525,6Transcend SSD370 512GB525,3Intel DC S3500 480GB523,2Intel SSD 730 240GB521,0OCZ Vector 180 960GB512,3OCZ Vector 180 240GB464,3Transcend SSD370 256GB452,8OCZ Vertex 460 240GB402,1OCZ Vertex 450 256GB384,7Intel SSD335 240GB377,6Crucial MX100 512GB356,6ADATA SU800 256GB353,502.700 Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB2.666,0Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB2.659,1ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB2.300,7OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB2.160,1Intel SSD 750 400GB2.048,2Kingston KC1000 480GB1.907,3Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe1.727,2ADATA SX8000 512GB1.635,5Samsung SM951 256GB @ 2x PCIe764,1OCZ Vector 150 120GB698,5Asus Hyper Express 256GB674,8Transcend SSD370 128GB633,8AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB604,7Intel SSD 730 240GB603,2Samsung 850 PRO 256GB584,7OCZ Vector 256GB570,2Corsair Force LX 256GB560,9OCZ ARC 100 240 GB547,1Intel DC S3500 480GB535,7Samsung 850 EVO 500GB534,9Transcend SSD370 512GB524,6ADATA SU650 240 GB523,8OCZ Vector 180 960GB509,4OCZ Vector 180 240GB491,2OCZ Vertex 460 240GB420,8OCZ Vertex 450 256GB397,9Intel SSD335 240GB392,6ADATA SU800 256GB367,5Crucial MX100 512GB356,4Transcend SSD370 256GB344,102.700 OCZ Vector 256GB0,0OCZ Vector 150 120GB0,0Corsair Force LX 256GB0,0Intel DC S3500 480GB0,0Intel SSD 730 240GB0,0Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB0,0Samsung 850 EVO 500GB0,0OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB0,0Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB0,0Transcend SSD370 128GB0,0ADATA SX8000 512GB0,0AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB0,0OCZ ARC 100 240 GB0,0Transcend SSD370 512GB0,1ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB0,1Intel SSD 750 400GB0,1OCZ Vertex 450 256GB0,1OCZ Vector 180 960GB0,1Kingston KC1000 480GB0,1OCZ Vector 180 240GB0,1Samsung SM951 256GB @ 2x PCIe0,1Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe0,1OCZ Vertex 460 240GB0,1Samsung 850 PRO 256GB0,1Transcend SSD370 256GB0,1Crucial MX100 512GB0,1ADATA SU650 240 GB0,1Intel SSD335 240GB0,1Asus Hyper Express 256GB0,200

Rezultati čitanja su nešto niži nego što to proizvođač navodi za SX8200, i to iz razloga jed AIDA drugačije mjeri performanse nego što to primjerice mjeri ATTO. SU650 ima performanse onakve kako ih i proizvođač navodi, uz ipak dosta visoko pristupno vrijeme.

AIDA64 Write

Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB1.497,6Intel SSD 750 400GB938,8OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB922,8Kingston KC1000 480GB908,4Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB796,0ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB677,8ADATA SX8000 512GB544,4OCZ Vector 180 960GB525,5Samsung 850 PRO 256GB487,3Crucial MX100 512GB485,1Samsung 850 EVO 500GB484,2Asus Hyper Express 256GB451,4Intel DC S3500 480GB430,9Transcend SSD370 512GB426,3AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB366,5OCZ Vertex 460 240GB362,9OCZ Vector 256GB353,0OCZ ARC 100 240 GB314,3Corsair Force LX 256GB290,7Transcend SSD370 256GB290,5OCZ Vector 150 120GB285,5Intel SSD 730 240GB273,8OCZ Vertex 450 256GB259,6OCZ Vector 180 240GB249,2Samsung SM951 256GB @ 2x PCIe239,0Intel SSD335 240GB225,2Transcend SSD370 128GB153,1ADATA SU650 240 GB101,0ADATA SU800 256GB73,901.500 ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB1.073,3Intel SSD 750 400GB981,4Kingston KC1000 480GB865,8Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB834,8Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe794,2ADATA SX8000 512GB565,3OCZ Vector 180 240GB397,6OCZ Vertex 460 240GB396,5Samsung SM951 256GB396,2OCZ Vector 256GB395,6Samsung 850 PRO 256GB376,6OCZ Vector 180 960GB373,8Samsung 850 EVO 500GB364,1Intel DC S3500 480GB343,6AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB329,3OCZ ARC 100 240 GB310,2OCZ Vertex 450 256GB296,6Crucial MX100 512GB284,9Intel SSD 730 240GB280,7Transcend SSD370 512GB256,8Corsair Force LX 256GB252,4Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB244,8Transcend SSD370 256GB241,2OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB219,0OCZ Vector 150 120GB201,4Intel SSD335 240GB168,6Transcend SSD370 128GB133,1Asus Hyper Express 256GB100,2ADATA SU800 256GB78,5ADATA SU650 240 GB58,401.100 Intel SSD 750 400GB0,0Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB0,0ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB0,0Intel DC S3500 480GB0,0ADATA SX8000 512GB0,0Intel SSD 730 240GB0,0OCZ Vector 150 120GB0,0OCZ Vector 180 240GB0,0OCZ Vertex 460 240GB0,0AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB0,1OCZ ARC 100 240 GB0,1OCZ Vector 180 960GB0,1OCZ Vertex 450 256GB0,1Kingston KC1000 480GB0,1Samsung 850 EVO 500GB0,1Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB0,1Samsung 850 PRO 256GB0,1Crucial MX100 512GB0,1Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe0,1Transcend SSD370 512GB0,1ADATA SU800 256GB0,2Samsung SM951 256GB @ 2x PCIe0,2Corsair Force LX 256GB0,2Transcend SSD370 256GB0,3Asus Hyper Express 256GB0,3OCZ Vector 256GB0,4Intel SSD335 240GB0,4OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB0,5Transcend SSD370 128GB0,60,601

Kod zapisa se situacija još više razlikuje jer AIDA vrlo brzo popuni SLC bufferu SX8200 i dolazi do usporenja. No sekvencijalnih skoro 700 i nasumičnih 1000 MB/s su i dalje vrlo dobri rezultati, pogotovo kada tome pribrojimo nisko vrijeme pristupa. Kod SU650 je situacija vrlo loša, AIDA ga pošteno muči i rezultati su vrlo slabi uz također vrlo visoko pristupno vrijeme.