AMD Ryzen 5 5600X recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 5 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – treći dio

Porast performansi overclockingom

Cinebench 15Ryzen 5 5600X @ OC1.922,0Ryzen 5 5600X1.907,002.114 Cinebench 20Ryzen 5 5600X @ OC4.471,0Ryzen 5 5600X4.351,004.918 CoronaRyzen 5 5600X @ OC120,0Ryzen 5 5600X123,00135 V-RayRyzen 5 5600X @ OC73,0Ryzen 5 5600X75,0083 wPrime v2.10Ryzen 5 5600X @ OC114,3Ryzen 5 5600X116,40128

Porast performansi overclockingom nije velik jer procesor u svim ovim benchmarcima ionako boosta sve jezgre na oko 4,6+ GHz, a viđali smo i do 4,65 GHz. Tako s porastom na 4,7 GHz ne dobivamo previše.

Memorijske performanse @ 3.600 MHz CL16

AIDA64 RAM ReadRyzen 9 5950X68.569,0Ryzen 9 3900XT54.188,0Ryzen 9 5900X54.099,0Core i7-10700K51.964,0Ryzen 3 3300X51.794,0Ryzen 7 3800XT51.406,0Core i5-10600K51.205,0Core i5-1050051.131,0Ryzen 9 5900X51.129,0Core i5-1040051.080,0Ryzen 5 5600X50.950,0Ryzen 3 310050.948,0075.426 AIDA64 RAM WriteRyzen 9 5950X53.108,0Ryzen 9 3900XT53.064,0Ryzen 9 5900X53.028,0Core i7-10700K52.089,0Core i5-10600K51.873,0Core i5-1050051.767,0Core i5-1040051.474,0Ryzen 3 310028.799,0Ryzen 3 3300X28.799,0Ryzen 9 5900X28.781,0Ryzen 5 5600X28.729,0Ryzen 7 3800XT27.798,0058.419 AIDA64 RAM CopyRyzen 9 5950X64.649,0Ryzen 9 3900XT55.684,0Ryzen 7 3800XT49.047,0Ryzen 5 5600X48.992,0Ryzen 9 5900X48.489,0Ryzen 3 310047.833,0Ryzen 3 3300X47.758,0Core i7-10700K47.125,0Ryzen 9 5900X46.859,0Core i5-10600K45.223,0Core i5-1040043.124,0Core i5-1050043.081,0071.114 AIDA64 RAM LatencyCore i7-10700K43,6Core i5-1040046,7Core i5-1050046,9Core i5-10600K47,1Ryzen 9 5900X58,8Ryzen 9 5900X59,1Ryzen 9 5950X59,8Ryzen 3 3300X65,8Ryzen 7 3800XT67,8Ryzen 9 3900XT69,0Ryzen 3 310070,3Ryzen 5 5600X71,2078

Memorijske performanse su šarolike. Čitanje i zapis su slabiji, kopiranje nije loše i onda latencija dosta visoka.

Potrošnja sistema

Potrošnjai5-750092,0Ryzen 3 1200105,0Ryzen 5 1400113,0i7-6700K120,0Core i5-10500124,0Core i5-10400125,0Ryzen 3 1300X125,0Ryzen 5 1500X130,0Ryzen 5 1600132,0Ryzen 7 1700137,0i7-7700K138,0Ryzen 7 2700141,0Ryzen 3 3100146,0Ryzen 5 2600155,0Ryzen 7 3700X160,0Ryzen 5 3600X162,0Ryzen 7 1700X162,0Ryzen 3 3300X163,0Ryzen 5 1600X163,0i5-8600K165,0Core i5-10600K167,0Ryzen 5 2600X170,0Ryzen 5 5600X172,0Ryzen 7 1800X173,0Core i7-10700K183,0Ryzen 7 5800X183,0Ryzen 7 3800XT193,0Ryzen 9 3900X195,0i7-6950X196,0i7-8700K200,0Ryzen 7 2700X201,0i7-5820K205,0Ryzen 9 5900X210,0Ryzen 9 3900XT211,0i7-5930K216,0i7-7800X225,0Ryzen 9 5950X225,0Ryzen 9 3950X230,00253

Potrošnja sistema je mjerena s OCCT-ovim large testom kao i kod ostatka procesora i vidimo da je 5600X potrošač jednak kao i 10600K, i da za oko 10 W više troši od Ryzena 5 3600X koji je uzgred budi rečeno 95 W procesor. No, porast performansi je ipak puno veći od tih 6% veće potrošnje pa je efikasnost bolja.

Zagrijavanje @ Aorus Liquid Cooler 280

TemperatureRyzen 9 5950X61,5Ryzen 9 5900X64,5Ryzen 7 5800X68,069,0076

Maksimalna Tdie temperatura je najniža od četiri testirana procesora što je i logično. Zanimljivo za napomenuti je da je prosječni takt u 50 minuta testiranja (OCCT, Large Data), bio 4,65 GHz za sve jezgre što je više od deklariranog maksimalnog boost takta za jednu jezgru! Druga iskazana temperatura Tdie CCD1 je ipak bila viša – 68,3°C.

Za usporedbu smo napravili i testove zagrijavanja sa Wraith Spire hladnjakom i maksimalna Tdie temperatura je s njim iznosila 88,8°C, a Tdie CCD čak 92°C.