Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC recenzija

· · Mobilno · Stranica 4 od 6

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

CPU performanse i usporedba s ostalim mobilnim procesorima

Cinebench 15 Multicore CPUDell G7 7790 – i9 9880H1.680,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7 10870H1.570,0Asus G531GU – i7 9750H1.470,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 10750H1.350,0Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H1.251,0Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8750H1.228,0Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H1.222,0Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H1.133,0Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK1.034,0Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H1.030,0Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 8665U839,0Asus G751JY – i7 4860HQ734,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-1065G7661,0Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165G7629,0Dell Latitude 7490 – i5 8350U617,0Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U610,0Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U607,0Alienware 17 R3 – i7 6700HQ606,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 8665U606,0Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10810U513,0Asus GL552VW – i5 6300HQ466,0HP Omen 17 – i5 6300HQ387,0Dell XPS 13 9365 – i5-7Y54219,001.848 Cinebench 20 Multicore CPUAsus TUF Gaming A15 – Ryzen 7 4800H3.931,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7 10870H3.424,0Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H3.315,0Dell G7 7790 – i9 9880H3.054,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 10750H2.928,0Asus G531GU – i7 9750H2.634,0Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H2.560,0Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8750H2.550,0Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H2.515,0Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK2.044,0Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H1.766,0Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 8665U1.505,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-1065G71.454,0Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165G71.445,0Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10810U1.439,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 8665U1.347,0Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U1.293,0Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U1.257,004.324

Kao što vidimo, performanse i7 10870H procesora su sasvim solidne i donose određeni pomak u performansama u odnosu na i7 10750H koji je 6-jezgreni model. No to razlika je puno veća u starijem nego u novom benchmarku, no i to ovisi o rashladnom sistemu i veličini prijenosnika. Većini korisnika i igrača bi ipak 10750H bio sasvim dovoljan.

Dodatni CPU testovi i usporedba s nekim desktop modelima

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Ryzen 7 4800H228,0Ryzen 7 3700X233,0Core i7 10750H258,1Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7 10870H275,7i5-10600K301,70332 JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)Ryzen 9 5900X195,9Ryzen 5 5600X192,4Core i9-10850K176,9Core i7-10700K161,3Ryzen 9 3900X156,0Ryzen 7 3800XT154,8Ryzen 9 3900XT154,7Ryzen 3 3300X152,8Core i5-10600K149,6Core i5-10500148,7Core i7-8700K141,5Core i5-10400140,8Ryzen 3 3100137,2127,10215 Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3900X72,0Ryzen 7 3700X112,0Ryzen 7 2700X118,0i5-10600K134,0Ryzen 7 4800H149,0Core i7 10750H154,0i7 10870H204,00224 wPrime 2.0Ryzen 9 3900X56,1Ryzen 7 3700X82,8Ryzen 7 2700X86,9Ryzen 7 4800H91,9i5-10600K118,7Core i7 10870H122,3Core i7 10750H131,90145

8-jezgreni se procesor u skučenom prostoru i s tankim hladnjakom solidno nosi s desktop procesorima pa može poslužiti i za kakav intenzivniji rad, no nemojte očekivati čuda. Zanimljivo je da je u dva benchmarka sporiji od 10750H.