Gigabyte B550 AORUS MASTER recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · MBO i RAM · Stranica 4 od 5

Rezultati testova

Performance Core Boost – Disabled

UL Benchmark

PCMark 10ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero6.562,0ASRock X570 Taichi6.561,0ASUS X570-E Gaming6.427,0MSI MEG X570 Godlike6.412,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master6.355,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro6.322,0ASRock X570M PRO46.233,0ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X6.217,0Gigabyte X570 Aorus PRO6.185,0ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PLUS6.181,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)6.048,007.218 3DMark Time SpyASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X9.450,0Gigabyte X570 Aorus PRO9.443,0ASRock X570 Taichi9.413,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)9.358,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master9.342,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro9.333,0010.395

PCMark mjeri općenite performanse sistema, Time Spy izvlači maksimum iz grafičke kartice.

U PCMarku su perfromanse vrlo solidne s malom razlikom među pločama, a u Time Spy grafičkom testu su puno izjednačenije.

CPU testovi

7-ZipASUS X570-E Gaming111.346,0ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PLUS110.542,0ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero110.447,0ASRock X570 Taichi110.255,0ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X109.120,0MSI MEG X570 Godlike109.111,0ASRock X570M PRO4108.902,0Gigabyte X570 Aorus PRO108.686,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)107.471,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master102.744,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro102.210,00122.481 Cinebench 15 Multi CoreASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X3.219,0ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero3.206,0ASRock X570 Taichi3.188,0Gigabyte X570 Aorus PRO3.188,0ASRock X570M PRO43.170,0ASUS X570-E Gaming3.167,0ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PLUS3.114,0MSI MEG X570 Godlike2.996,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master2.966,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro2.956,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)2.946,003.541 Cinebench 15 Single CoreASRock X570 Taichi212,0Gigabyte X570 Aorus PRO212,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)209,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro207,0ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X204,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master203,0ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X203,0ASRock X570M PRO4203,0ASUS X570-E Gaming202,0ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero201,0MSI MEG X570 Godlike200,0178,0178,00233 Cinebench 20 (Multi)Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro6.805,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)6.744,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master6.739,007.486

Obje Gigabyteove ploče s PCB disabled imaju slabiji 7-Zip rezultat, kao i single core rezultat u Cinebenchu 15. Multi core performanse su u oba Cinebencha visoke i onakve kakve trebaju biti.

Memorijska propusnost

AIDA64 – RAM ReadGigabyte X570 Aorus PRO55.890,0ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X55.324,0ASRock X570M PRO455.257,0ASRock X570 Taichi55.008,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro54.993,0ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PLUS54.905,0ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero54.827,0ASUS X570-E Gaming54.731,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master54.559,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)54.509,0061.479 AIDA64 – RAM WriteGigabyte B550 Aorus Master53.241,0ASRock X570 Taichi53.199,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro53.199,0ASRock X570M PRO453.108,0ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X53.097,0Gigabyte X570 Aorus PRO53.091,0ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PLUS52.953,0ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero52.892,0MSI MEG X570 Godlike52.772,0ASUS X570-E Gaming52.708,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)52.410,0058.565 AIDA64 – RAM CopyASRock X570M PRO456.207,0ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X56.177,0ASRock X570 Taichi55.969,0Gigabyte X570 Aorus PRO55.888,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master55.832,0ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero55.686,0MSI MEG X570 Godlike55.418,0ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PLUS55.324,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro54.822,0ASUS X570-E Gaming54.587,0Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)53.662,0061.828 AIDA64 RAM LatencyASUS X570-E Gaming67,5MSI MEG X570 Godlike67,5ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming X67,7ASUS Crosshair VIII Hero67,8ASRock X570M PRO467,9ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PLUS67,9Gigabyte X570 Aorus PRO68,0ASRock X570 Taichi68,1Asus Rog Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi)68,6Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master70,2Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro70,3077

Memorijske su performanse su vrlo dobre, s tek nešto višim vremenom pristupa.

Performance Core Boost – Auto, Disabled & Overclock (4.3GHz) testovi

UL Benchmark

PCMark 10Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ OC6.370,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Auto6.355,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Disabled5.723,007.007 3DMark Time SpyGigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ OC9.403,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Auto9.397,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Disabled9.342,0010.343

CPU testovi

7-ZipGigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ OC109.503,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Auto107.945,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Disabled102.744,00120.453 Cinebench 15 Multi CoreGigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ OC3.333,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Auto3.176,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Disabled2.966,003.666 Cinebench 15 Single CoreGigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Auto213,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ OC202,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Disabled178,00234 Cinebench 20 Multi CoreGigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ OC7.640,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Auto7.260,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Disabled6.739,008.404 Cinebench 20 Single CoreGigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Auto526,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ OC499,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Disabled442,00579 V-Ray 1.0.8.Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Auto44,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ OC45,0Gigabyte B550 Aorus Master @ PCB Disabled49,0054

Odlučili smo napraviti usporedne testove performansi u tri različita moda rada. Dva su Gigabyteova tvornička – PCB Auto i Disabled, a treći je ručni overclock u kojem smo podesili 4,3 GHz frekvenciju procesora i napon od 1,35 V. Rezultati su kao što vidimo vrlo zanimljivi. U većini je testova PCB Auto vrlo blizak overclockiranom rezultatu, dok je PCB Disabled slabiji. Ipak, u oba Cinebench Single Core testa je PCB Auto postigao bolji rezultat od OC jer ploča tjera jednu jezgru između 4,4 do 4,5 GHz – ovisno o situaciji.

POVEZANI ČLANCI