Rezultati testova – drugi dio
ATTO Disk Benchmark
|
 |
| Read 4kb (MB/s) |
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 308,224 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 232,889 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 224,718 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 211,439 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 131,112 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 110,041 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 103,166 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Write 4kb (MB/s) |
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 336,896 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 264,192 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 259,424 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 239,616 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 181,635 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 96,015 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 12,257 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Read 512kb (MB/s) |
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 561,296 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 560,712 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 502,914 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 488,846 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 420,27 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 404,075 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 399,457 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Write 512kb (MB/s) |
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 509,017 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 477,711 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 477,111 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 417,759 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 388,361 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 369,216 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 165,651 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
4K performanse su kao što vidimo čak nešto i bolje nego kod S3700, dok je kod 512K performansi situacija nešto izjednačenija. U svakodnevnom radu i sa prosječnim opterećenjem dakle nećete osjetiti nikakvu razliku.
IOMeter (100% Random)
|
 |
| Total I/O per second |
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 72240,07 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 57701,83 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 34849,68 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 21482,09 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 19543,62 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 17700,45 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 15847,96 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| 0 |
20 |
000 |
40 |
000 |
60 |
000 |
800 |
|
00 |
|
| |
| Total MB per second |
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 141,09 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 112,7 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 68,07 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 41,96 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 38,17 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 34,57 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 30,95 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Average I/O Response time (ms) |
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 0,2767 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 0,3464 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 0,5737 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 0,9308 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 1,0232 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 1,1297 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 1,2618 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
4 |
|
| |
| Maximum I/O Response time (ms) |
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 6,2752 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 14,9545 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 128GB |
| 35,7036 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 75,4012 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 85,6501 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 345,4264 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 618,4861 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| % CPU Utilization |
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 0,96 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 1,92 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 2,3 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 3,8 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 7,63 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 10,23 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 14,7 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
5 |
|
| |
Kod ovoga je mjerenja razlika već primjetnija (32QD, 67% Read, 33% Write) u korist S3700 modela. Ono što je iznimno bitno su malena vremena odziva što je posebno izraženo kod maksimalnog vremena, pri čemu je S3500 jednostavno izvrstan.
IOMeter (100% Sequential)
|
 |
| Total I/O per second |
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 31488,38 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 22619,5 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 18381,81 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 15024,29 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 12956,39 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 11148,1 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 |
| 4362,89 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| 0 |
80 |
00 |
16 |
000 |
24 |
000 |
320 |
|
00 |
|
| |
| Total MB per second |
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 61,5 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 44,18 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 35,9 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 29,34 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 25,31 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 21,77 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 |
| 8,52 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| 0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
7 |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Average I/O Response time (ms) |
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 0,635 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 0,884 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 1,0879 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 1,331 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 1,5435 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 1,7938 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 4,5839 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Maximum I/O Response time (ms) |
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 17,0098 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 22,0971 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 25,071 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 33,5179 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 35,325 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 36,7278 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 615,7187 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| % CPU Utilization |
| Intel DC S3500 480GB |
| 0,44 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vector 256GB |
| 0,93 |
 |
|
|
| Seagate Enterprise SSD 240GB |
| 1,03 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 4 256GB |
| 1,28 |
 |
|
|
| OCZ Vertex 450 256GB |
| 2,55 |
 |
|
|
| Intel DC S3700 800GB |
| 3,31 |
 |
|
|
| Intel SSD335 240GB |
| 31,29 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
|
2 |
|
| |
Sekvencijalne performanse su znatno lošije neko kod S3700, čak najlošije od svih uspoređenih testova. No zabrinuli bi se samo da su i nasumične ovako loše.