Nvidia GeForce GTX1080 Founders Edition test

· · Video · Stranica 7 od 8

Rezultati testova – četvrti dio

BukaAMD Radeon R9 Fury X39,0Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X42,0Sapphire Nitro R9 Fury43,0Gainward GTX970 Phantom44,0MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G44,0Nvidia GTX108044,0Asus GTX780 STRIX OC45,0Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G145,0MSI R9 290X Lightning45,0ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX98046,0ASUS STRIX R9 390X 8GB46,0Sapphire R9 390 Nitro46,0Nvidia GTX78047,0Nvidia GTX780 Ti47,0Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X47,0Asus GTX680 DCUII48,0ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti48,0Nvidia GeForce GTX98048,0Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4GB OC48,0Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8GB48,0AMD Radeon R9 290X @ Uber49,0AMD Radeon R9 290 @ Uber49,0ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II49,0Nvidia GTX980 Ti49,0Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB49,0AMD R9 Nano50,0ASUS MARS 76051,0AMD R9 295X253,0058

Cilj zadovoljavajuće tihog rashladnog sustava je postignut i GTX1080 je ponovno nakon bučnije GTX980 Ti ugodna za uši. Kao što smo napisali u opisu overclockingom okretaju rastu s 2.200 na 3.000 a buka na već dosta čujnih 54 dB.

PotrošnjaNvidia GTX980375,0Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G1383,0MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G394,0Gainward GTX970 Phantom400,0ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX980412,0Nvidia GTX780427,0AMD R9 Nano431,0Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI440,0Nvidia GTX1080453,0Nvidia GTX980 Ti465,0Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X468,0Sapphire Nitro R9 Fury480,0Asus GTX780 STRIX OC495,0ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti497,0ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II499,0Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB500,0MSI R9 290X Lightning501,0AMD Radeon R9 290502,0Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4GB OC502,0Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8GB503,0AMD Radeon R9 290X508,0AMD Radeon R9 Fury X521,0Sapphire R9 390 Nitro522,0ASUS STRIX R9 390X 8GB525,0Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X527,02x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX541,0AMD R9 295X2733,00806

Potrošnja čitavog sistema je očekivano iznad onoga s GTX980, te nešto ispod GTX980 Ti. No, s obzirom na to koliko je brža od njih, može se reći kako je vrlo efikasna. Uz to, ova je vršna potrošnja izmjerena u novom Hitmanu, dok se nekakav prosjek po naslovima kreće oko 420 W.

ZagrijavanjeAMD Radeon R9 Fury X58,0Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G160,0ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC62,0AMD R9 295X263,0ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX98064,0MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G68,0MSI R9 290X Lightning69,0Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4GB OC70,0Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X70,0Asus GTX780 STRIX OC71,0Gigabyte GTX580 SOC71,0MSI GTX770 TwinFrozr71,0Gigabyte GTX770 OC71,0Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8GB71,0Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB @ OC72,0Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X73,0Sapphire R9 390 Nitro74,0Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB75,0AMD R9 Nano75,0ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti75,0Gainward GTX970 Phantom75,0Sapphire Nitro R9 Fury75,0Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X80,0Nvidia GTX98083,0ASUS STRIX R9 390X 8GB83,0Nvidia GTX980 Ti84,0Nvidia GTX780 Ti84,0Nvidia GTX108084,0ASUS MARS 76093,0AMD Radeon R9 29094,0AMD Radeon R9 290X95,00105

Grafički se procesor dosta zagrijava zbog činjenice da se okretaji ventilatora zadržavaju nisko radi buke, a prilikom overclockinga to raste i na 87°C. Problema s ponašanjem ventilatora, koji su neki zabilježili, nismo imali za što su očito zaslužni driveri.