Recenzija – MSGW Gamer Extreme X299 i101

· · Računala · Stranica 3 od 5

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

Futuremark sintetika

PCMark 8MSGW X299 Extreme Gamer4.715,005.187 PCMark 10MSGW X299 Extreme Gamer @ OC6.349,0MSGW X299 Extreme Gamer5.572,006.984

PCMarkovi pokazuju visoke ukupne rezultate, usporedive is onima kakve smo dobivali sa i7-8700K procesorom što je dobro ako znamo da PCMarkovi vole visoku frekvenciju. Overclocking procesora na 4.3 GHz to vrlo zorno i dočarava s lijepim porastom performansi u PCMarku 10.

3DMark FirestrikeMSGW X299 Extreme Gamer @ OC22.530,0MSGW X299 Extreme Gamer21.488,0024.783 3DMark TimeSpy ScoreMSGW X299 Extreme Gamer @ OC9.817,0MSGW X299 Extreme Gamer9.497,0010.799 3DMark TimeSpy CPU Scorei7-7900X @ OC11.227,0i7-7900X10.553,0i7-8700K9.497,0012.350

3DMark performanse grafičke kartice su također visoke i pokazuju kako procesor može izvući maksimum iz grafičke kartice, no i kako mjesta za napredak ima uz overclocking (overclockiran je samo CPU na 4.3 GHz). Možda nije najidealniji gaming CPU na svijetu, no pojavljuju se igre koje koriste više od četiri jezgre i ubuduće će ih biti sve više. Isprobali smo i par DX12 naslova i grafička je davala maksimum.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPThreadripper 1950X73.545,0Threadripper 1920X56.960,0i9-7900X56.201,0i7-6950X50.375,0Ryzen 7 1800X41.197,0i7-8700K40.613,0i7-5960X40.065,0Ryzen 7 1700X39.010,0i7-7800X37.543,0Ryzen 7 170036.906,0i7-4960X35.921,0i7-3960X34.371,0i7-5930K32.228,0Ryzen 5 1600X32.093,0i7-5820K31.261,0Ryzen 5 160031.200,0i7-980X29.058,0i7-3930K28.938,0i7-7700K28.583,0i7-6700K26.328,0i7-4790K26.327,0i7-3770K24.437,0i7-4770K23.564,0Ryzen 5 1500X22.909,0FX-815020.957,0i7-2600K20.101,0Ryzen 5 140020.016,0i5-4690K18.528,0i5-6600K18.155,0i5-4670K17.203,0i5-750016.598,0Ryzen 3 1300X14.896,0i5-2500K14.254,0Ryzen 3 120012.560,0080.900

Rezultat koji je tik ispod Threadrippera 1920X (12C/24T) zorno pokazuje koliko je ovaj procesor bržih IPC performansi od AMD-ovih, te koliko mu visoki takt pomaže u lovu na AMD-ove procesore s više jezgri. Cijena je jasno druga kategorija. Osjetna je zralika i u odnosu na prethodnika, i7-6950X. Ovdje ide i napomena kako su svi testovi napravljeni s MultiCore Enhancementom uključenim.

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Threadripper 1950X161,3Threadripper 1920X197,1i9-7900X204,4i7-8700K283,4i7-7800X355,10391

Ponovno, ni u Blenderu nije puno slabiji od 1920X. Ovdje nemamo rezultat za i7-6950X, jer smo benchmark uveli nakon njegovog testa.

Cinebench 15Threadripper 1950X2.956,0Threadripper 1920X2.431,0i9-7900X2.180,0i7-6950X1.864,0Ryzen 7 1800X1.624,0i7-8700K1.546,0Ryzen 7 1700X1.542,0Ryzen 7 17001.403,0i7-5960X1.377,0i7-7800X1.264,0Ryzen 5 1600X1.241,0Ryzen 5 16001.129,0i7-5930K1.101,0i7-5820K1.074,0i7-7700K989,0i7-6700K935,0Ryzen 5 1500X814,0Ryzen 5 1400703,0i5-6600K651,0i5-7500596,0Ryzen 3 1300X558,0Ryzen 3 1200482,003.252

Ovdje je razlika ipak malo osjetnija, CB15 malo bolje iskorištava dostupne mu jezgre. I opet, vidljiv je solidan napredak u odnosu na prethodnika.

HandbrakeThreadripper 1950X38,3Threadripper 1920X35,2i9-7900X35,0i7-8700K26,2Ryzen 7 1800X25,6Ryzen 7 1700X24,6Ryzen 7 170022,3i7-7800X19,7Ryzen 5 1600X19,5Ryzen 5 160017,5i7-5820K17,2i7-7700K17,1i7-6700K15,9Ryzen 5 1500X13,1Ryzen 5 140011,6i5-750011,3Ryzen 3 1300X10,2Ryzen 3 12008,4042

Ponovno vrlo blizak rezultat sa 1920X. Ponovno nemamo rezultat za i7-6950X, jer smo benchmark uveli nakon njegovog testa.

TrueCrypt v7.1Threadripper 1950X18,4Threadripper 1920X15,2i9-7900X12,2i7-6950X10,5Ryzen 7 1800X10,0Ryzen 7 1700X9,4i7-8700K8,7Ryzen 7 17008,6i7-5960X8,4i7-7800X7,4Ryzen 5 1600X7,3Ryzen 5 16006,7i7-5930K6,6i7-5820K6,3i7-4960X6,0i7-7700K5,6i7-3960X5,5i7-6700K5,2i7-4790K5,2Ryzen 5 1500X4,8i7-4770K4,5Ryzen 5 14004,3i5-6600K3,4i5-4670K3,3FX-81503,3i5-4690K3,3i5-75003,2i7-3770K3,2Ryzen 3 1300X3,1i5-2500K2,8Ryzen 3 12002,1020

TrueCrypt daje lijepo prednost Threadripperima, dok je razlika 7900X vs. 6950X oko 16.2% u korist i9.

wPrime 2.0Threadripper 1950X54,1Threadripper 1920X69,2i9-7900X75,8i7-6950X86,9Ryzen 7 1800X103,9i7-8700K106,9Ryzen 7 1700X108,3i7-5960X116,9Ryzen 7 1700121,4i7-7800X126,2i7-4960X129,6i7-3960X135,1i7-5930K136,3Ryzen 5 1600X138,7i7-5820K140,2Ryzen 5 1600149,9i7-3930K164,6i7-7700K167,4i7-6700K178,3i7-4790K186,5i7-4770K195,2i7-3770K198,1Ryzen 5 1500X213,5i7-2600K225,0Ryzen 5 1400237,5FX-8150276,0i5-6600K277,7i5-4670K285,4i5-7500301,0i5-2500K321,6Ryzen 3 1300X334,0Ryzen 3 1200389,50428

I wPrime smješta 7900X između 1920X i 6950X.

Iz svih CPU testova je vidljivo kako je 1920X bolji procesor za multithreaded testove, a u korist 7900X-a ne ide ni potrošnja, a pogotovo ne cijena.