Recenzija – MSGW Office računala s Ryzenima PRO 4000

· · Računala · Stranica 2 od 4

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi

PCMark 10Core i7-10700K6.346,0Ryzen 9 3950X6.249,0Ryzen 9 3900X6.222,0Ryzen 7 3800XT6.129,0Ryzen 9 3900XT6.095,0Core i5-10600K6.067,0Ryzen 5 3600X5.976,0Ryzen 3 3300X5.753,0Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G5.636,0Core i5-105005.610,0Ryzen 7 2700X5.523,0Core i5-104005.513,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G5.427,0Ryzen 3 31005.085,0Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G4.944,006.981 3DMark Fire StrikeRyzen 7 Pro 4750G4.004,0Ryzen 5 3400G3.639,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G3.621,0Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G3.273,0Ryzen 5 2400G3.203,0Ryzen 3 2200G2.700,0A10-7680K1.892,004.404 3DMark TimeSpyRyzen 7 Pro 4750G1.547,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G1.394,0Ryzen 5 3400G1.367,0Ryzen 5 2400G1.251,0Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G1.199,0Ryzen 3 2200G1.000,001.702

PCMark 10 mjeri općenite performanse sistema, a 3DMark nam kombinirane performanse snage procesora i grafike. Kod PCMark rezultata moramo napomenuti da su svi usporedni rezultati dobiveni na našem test stroju s RX 5700 XT grafikom i ponešto drugačijim diskovima pa rezultati nisu do kraja usporedivi. Ipak, vidljivo je da se sva ti MSGW računala drže odlično i rezultati su dobri. Sva tri su i više no sposobna za sve zadaće koje se pred njih stavi, a dva jača i puno zahtjevnije.

U 3DMarku vidimo da je postignut napredak u performansama i 4750G je dosta brži od 3400G koji je pak u rangu s 4650G. S druge strane 4350G je u rangu s 2400G. Jasno je da ove integrirane grafike nisu u potpunosti iskoristive za igranje, no ako niste pretjerano zahtjevni po pitanju rezolucije i razine detalja, moći će te igrati većinu aktualnih igara u 720p i Low detaljima.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPRyzen 9 3950X132.846,0Ryzen 9 3900XT110.853,0Ryzen 9 3900X110.418,0Ryzen 7 3800XT81.305,0Core i7-10700K71.450,0Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G70.776,0Ryzen 7 3700X56.540,0Core i5-10600K56.338,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G54.924,0Core i5-1050052.333,0Core i5-1040050.744,0i7-6950X50.375,0Ryzen 7 2700X48.030,0Ryzen 7 270042.859,0Ryzen 7 1800X41.197,0i7-8700K40.613,0i7-5960X40.065,0Ryzen 7 1700X39.010,0Ryzen 5 2600X37.676,0i7-7800X37.543,0Ryzen 7 170036.906,0i7-4960X35.921,0Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G34.580,0i7-3960X34.371,0Ryzen 5 260033.967,0i7-5930K32.228,0Ryzen 5 1600X32.093,0Ryzen 3 3300X31.909,0i7-5820K31.261,0Ryzen 5 160031.200,0i7-980X29.058,0i7-3930K28.938,0Ryzen 3 310028.569,0i7-7700K28.583,0i5-8600K28.294,0i7-6700K26.328,0i7-4790K26.327,0i7-3770K24.437,0Ryzen 5 3400G23.871,0i7-4770K23.564,0Ryzen 5 1500X22.909,0Ryzen 5 2400G21.251,0FX-815020.957,0i7-2600K20.101,0Ryzen 5 140020.016,0i5-4690K18.528,0i5-6600K18.155,0i5-4670K17.203,0i5-750016.598,0Ryzen 3 1300X14.896,0Ryzen 3 2200G14.871,0Athlon 3000G14.629,0i5-2500K14.254,0Athlon 200GE13.585,0Ryzen 3 120012.560,00146.131

Jasno je bilo da će 4750G ostvariti odličan rezultat jer ipak radi na solidno visokim taktovima, no iznenađenje je ipak da je u rangu s 10700K – odlično. 4650G i njegovih šest jezgara su sasvim u rangu s 10600K, što je odličan rezultat. 4350G je otprilike brza kao i Ryzen 7 1700 koji je 6-jezgreni procesor pa se vidi koliki je napredak ostvaren kroz četiri generacije.

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3950X121,8Ryzen 9 3900XT156,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Ryzen 7 3800XT202,4Core i7-10700K218,4Ryzen R7 3700X233,0Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G246,3Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7-8700K283,4Ryzen 7 1800X299,6Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K301,7Ryzen 5 3600X313,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G315,9Core i5-10400343,0Ryzen 5 2600X344,8i7-7800X355,1Core i5-10500357,5Ryzen 5 2600366,7i5-8600K406,6Ryzen 3 3300X436,1Ryzen 3 3100485,9Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G497,5Ryzen 5 3400G549,8Ryzen 5 2400G571,9Ryzen 3 2200G874,2Athlon 200GE1.320,2Athlon 3000G1.327,801.461

U Blenderu je 4750G ipak malo sporiji od 10700K, no zato je brži od 2700X. 4650G je pak u rangu s 3600X i nešto je sporiji od 10600K. Najslabiji 4350G je malo sporiji od Ryzena 3 3100, dok je u 7 Zipu čak bio dosta brži od njega.

Cinebench 15Ryzen 9 3950X4.057,0Ryzen 9 3900X3.188,0Ryzen 9 3900XT3.175,0Ryzen 7 3800XT2.230,0Ryzen 7 3700X2.137,0Core i7-10700K2.038,0Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G2.003,0i7-6950X1.864,0Ryzen 7 2700X1.828,0Ryzen 7 1800X1.624,0Ryzen 7 27001.588,0Ryzen 5 3600X1.582,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G1.555,0i7-8700K1.546,0Ryzen 7 1700X1.542,0Core i5-10600K1.415,0Ryzen 7 17001.403,0i7-5960X1.377,0Ryzen 5 2600X1.368,0Core i5-105001.332,0Core i5-104001.302,0Ryzen 5 26001.301,0i7-7800X1.264,0Ryzen 5 1600X1.241,0Ryzen 3 3300X1.133,0Ryzen 5 16001.129,0i7-5930K1.101,0i7-5820K1.074,0i5-8600K1.030,0Ryzen 3 31001.015,0i7-7700K989,0i7-6700K978,0Ryzen 3 4350G935,0Ryzen 5 3400G874,0Ryzen 5 2400G829,0Ryzen 5 1500X814,0Ryzen 5 1400703,0i5-6600K651,0i3-8100604,0i5-7500596,0Ryzen 3 2200G567,0Ryzen 3 1300X558,0Ryzen 3 1200482,0i3-7350K445,0Athlon 3000G377,0Athlon 200GE357,004.463

Cinebench pokazuje da je 4750G ponovno u razini sa 10700K, 4650K sa 3600X i malo iznad 10600K, a 4350G donosi opet niži rezultat od 3100, te manji napredak u odnosu na 3400G od očekivanog.

Tko želi uspoređivati, single core rezultati su sljedeći: 4750G – 194cb; 4650G – 184cb i 4350G – 176cb.

Cinebench 20 Multi coreRyzen 9 3950X9.265,0Ryzen 9 3900XT7.302,0Ryzen 9 3900X7.237,0Ryzen 7 3800XT5.123,0Core i7-10700K4.936,0Ryzen 7 3700X4.916,0Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G4.713,0Ryzen 7 2700X3.857,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G3.641,0Core i5-10600K3.592,0Core i7-8700K3.408,0Ryzen 5 3600X3.369,0Core i5-104003.147,0Core i5-105003.055,0Ryzen 3 3300X2.583,0Ryzen 3 31002.340,0Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G2.238,0Ryzen 5 3400G1.956,0Ryzen 5 2400G1.835,0010.192 Cinebench 20 Single CoreRyzen 7 Pro 4750G501,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G485,0Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G430,0Ryzen 5 3400G386,0Ryzen 5 2400G356,00551

U novijem je Cinebenchu ponovno vidimo slične performanse, a lijep je i napredak koji procesori ostvaruju u single core performansama u odnosu na starije generacije.

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3950X61,0Ryzen 9 3900X72,0Ryzen 9 3900XT72,0Core i7-10700K96,0Ryzen 7 3800XT104,0Ryzen 7 3700X112,0Ryzen 7 2700X118,0Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G127,0Core i5-10600K134,0Core i7-8700K141,0Ryzen 5 3600X144,0Core i5-10500146,0Core i5-10400148,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G162,0Ryzen 3 3300X202,0Ryzen 3 3100233,0Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G251,0Ryzen 5 3400G256,0Ryzen 5 2400G276,00304

Corona Renderer je fotorealistični renderer dostupan za Autodeskov 3ds Max ili kao standalone CLI aplikacija. Razvija se i verzija za Maxon Cinemu 4D. Dostupan je i benchmark koji automatski renderira scenu i izbacuje rezultat u sekundama, te u Rays/sec.

U Corona benchmarku su procesori malo podbacili iz nepoznatog razloga, pa je 4750G samo malo brži od 10600K.

HandbrakeRyzen 9 3900X69,6Ryzen 9 3900XT66,5Ryzen 7 3800XT61,0Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G56,9Core i7-10700K52,7Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G47,5Core i7-8700K42,6Core i5-10600K41,3Core i5-1040039,6Core i5-1050038,9Ryzen 3 3300X34,1Ryzen 7 2700X32,2Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G31,6077

Odličan rezultat za svaki od procesora! 4750G je skoro ulovio 3800XT, a 10700K dosta zaostaje. Tako je i sa 4650G gdje 10600K dosta kaska, a 4350G je samo malo sporiji od 3300X.

JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)Core i7-10700K161,3Ryzen 9 3900X156,0Ryzen 7 3800XT154,7Ryzen 9 3900XT152,8Ryzen 3 3300X149,6Core i5-10600K148,7Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G144,6Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G142,2Core i5-10500141,5Core i7-8700K140,8Core i5-10400137,2Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G135,7Ryzen 3 3100127,10177

JetStream 2 je browser benchmark koji se fokusira na web aplikacije, koji kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. Veći broj znači bolje performanse, ovdje su 4750G i 4650G podjednaki, dok je 3450G ipak malo brži od Ryzena 3 3100.

V-Ray Benchmark 1.0.8 (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3950X36,0Ryzen R9 3900X46,0Ryzen 9 3900XT46,0Ryzen 7 3800XT64,0Core i7-10700K65,0Ryzen 7 3700X69,0Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G70,0Core i5-10600K89,0Core i5-8700K91,0Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G91,0Ryzen 5 3600X93,0Core i5-10400101,0Core i5-10500104,0Ryzen 3 3300X122,0Ryzen 3 3100140,0Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G141,0Ryzen 5 3400G154,0Ryzen 5 2400G165,00182

V-Ray Benchmark je proizvod ChaosGroup-a koji je stand-alone aplikacija za mjerenje performansi procesora i grafike u renderiranju. Dostupan je za 3ds Max, Mayu, Cinemu 4D, Blender, SketchUp itd.

I ovdje su procesori ostvarili respektabilne rezultate.

wPrime 2.0Ryzen Threadripper 3970X23,9Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX31,6Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX38,6Ryzen 9 3950X42,4Ryzen Threadripper 2950X49,2Threadripper 1950X54,1Ryzen Threadripper 2920X56,1Ryzen 9 3900X56,4Ryzen 9 3900XT56,5Threadripper 1920X62,6i7-6950X69,2Ryzen 7 3800XT80,1Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G81,8Ryzen R7 3700X82,8Core i7-10700K85,3Ryzen 7 2700X86,9Ryzen 7 1800X95,6i7-8700K103,9Ryzen 7 1700X106,9Ryzen 5 Pro 4650G107,4Ryzen 7 2700108,3i7-5960X110,6Ryzen 5 3600X113,3Ryzen 7 1700116,9Core i5-10600K118,7i7-7800X121,4Ryzen 5 2600X126,2Ryzen 5 2600126,8i7-4960X129,6Core i5-10500131,3Core i5-10400133,3i7-3960X135,1i7-5930K135,4Ryzen 5 1600X136,3i7-5820K138,7Ryzen 5 1600140,2i7-3930K149,9Ryzen 3 3300X158,6i5-8600K164,6i7-7700K167,4Ryzen 3 Pro 4350G169,0i7-6700K175,4i7-4790K176,0Ryzen 3 3100178,3i7-4770K186,5Ryzen 5 3400G194,4i7-3770K195,2Ryzen 5 1500X198,1i7-2600K213,5Ryzen 5 1400225,0FX-8150237,50261

Za kraj dolazimo do najvećeg grafa gdje se lijepo vide generacijski skokovi, još tamo do FX-8150 procesora. 4350G je između 3300X i 3100, 4650G je kao 2700 i 1700X, a 4750G je brz gotovo kao i 3800XT – odlično!