Samsung SSD 850 Pro 256GB test

· Krešimir Matanović · Mediji · Stranica 4 od 6

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

ATTO Disk Benchmark

Patriot Blaze 240GB358,4OCZ Vector 150 120GB316,6OCZ Vector 180 240GB311,3OCZ Vector 256GB308,2OCZ Vector 180 960GB299,1OCZ Vertex 460 240GB288,8Corsair Force LX 256GB267,3Samsung 850 PRO 256GB266,2OCZ ARC 100 240 GB259,5Intel SSD 730 240GB248,8Patriot Pyro 240GB242,7takeMS UTX-PO318239,0Intel DC S3500 480GB232,9OCZ Vertex 450 256GB224,7Crucial MX100 512GB211,4AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB201,7Intel SSD335 240GB110,0ASUS Hyper Express 256GB95,80360 Patriot Blaze 240GB344,1takeMS UTX-PO318339,1OCZ Vector 180 960GB331,8Patriot Pyro 240GB328,7OCZ Vector 180 240GB293,9Intel SSD 730 240GB285,7OCZ Vertex 460 240GB270,3Intel DC S3500 480GB264,2OCZ Vector 256GB259,4Samsung 850 PRO 256GB248,8Corsair Force LX 256GB247,8OCZ ARC 100 240 GB243,1Crucial MX100 512GB208,9OCZ Vector 150 120GB195,5AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB182,8OCZ Vertex 450 256GB181,6ASUS Hyper Express 256GB118,8Intel SSD335 240GB96,00350 OCZ Vector 150 120GB562,5OCZ Vector 256GB561,3Samsung 850 PRO 256GB561,3Corsair Force LX 256GB558,9Crucial MX100 512GB558,8takeMS UTX-PO318557,8OCZ Vector 180 240GB554,9OCZ Vector 180 960GB554,3Intel SSD 730 240GB554,3Patriot Blaze 240GB553,2OCZ Vertex 460 240GB550,9AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB547,5Patriot Pyro 240GB528,9Intel DC S3500 480GB502,9OCZ ARC 100 240 GB487,7OCZ Vertex 450 256GB404,1Intel SSD335 240GB399,5ASUS Hyper Express 256GB231,00600 ASUS Hyper Express 256GB723,1takeMS UTX-PO318535,5OCZ Vertex 460 240GB532,9Samsung 850 PRO 256GB530,2OCZ Vector 180 240GB530,2Patriot Blaze 240GB528,9OCZ Vector 180 960GB527,6AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB523,0Crucial MX100 512GB511,5Patriot Pyro 240GB510,3Intel DC S3500 480GB477,7OCZ ARC 100 240 GB430,6OCZ Vector 256GB417,8Intel SSD335 240GB388,4OCZ Vertex 450 256GB369,2Corsair Force LX 256GB306,2Intel SSD 730 240GB290,2OCZ Vector 150 120GB195,30730

4K performanse su u sredini poretka, no zato 512K performanse zakucavaju u sam limit SATA III kontrolera.

I/O Meter Mixed Workload

OCZ Vector 180 240GB @ Database40.756,6Samsung 850 PRO 256GB @ Database2.166,9OCZ Vector 180 240GB 256GB @ FileServer23.468,9Samsung 850 PRO 256GB @ FileServer2.319,1OCZ Vector 180 240GB @ Workstation35.718,5Samsung 850 PRO 256GB @ Workstation3.353,1OCZ Vector 180 240GB @ WebServer28.257,5Samsung 850 PRO 256GB @ WebServer7.922,9053.000

Rezultati miješanih testova, tj. simulacija četiri načina rada u serverskom okruženju su poprilično slabi za ovog Samsunga i tu je OCZ-ov kontroler nadmoćniji.

POVEZANI ČLANCI