OGLAS

Sapphire R9 270X Toxic & R9 270 Dual-X test

· · Video · Stranica 6 od 7

Rezultati testova – treći dio

PotrošnjaAMD R9 270X: 290AMD R9 270X290ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP: 293ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP293Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 320Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X320ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP: 330ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP330Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 333Sapphire R9 270X Toxic333Gigabyte R9 270 OC: 340Gigabyte R9 270 OC340Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 350Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X350Asus Striker Platinum: 358Asus Striker Platinum358ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 362ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC362MSI R9 280X: 371MSI R9 280X371Asus GTX680 DCUII: 375Asus GTX680 DCUII375Gigabyte GTX770 OC: 396Gigabyte GTX770 OC396AMD HD7970 GHz Edition: 422AMD HD7970 GHz Edition4220464

Lijepo vidimo koliko je potrošnja Sapphirove kartice sa jednim PCIe Power konektorom manja od Gigabyteove koja ima dva, a razlika u performansama i nije bila tako velika. Toxic također ne troši pretjerano i uspijeva se zadržati čak i ispod Vapor-X modela.

TemperatureGigabyte R9 270 OC: 60Gigabyte R9 270 OC60Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 60Sapphire R9 270X Toxic60Asus GTX680 DCUII: 61Asus GTX680 DCUII61MSI GTX770 Lightning: 62MSI GTX770 Lightning62ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC: 62ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC62Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 65Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X65ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP: 67ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP67Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 67Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X67Asus Striker Platinum: 67Asus Striker Platinum67ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP: 68ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP68ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 68ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC68Gigabyte GTX580 SOC: 71Gigabyte GTX580 SOC71078

Ulog u Toxic model se svakako isplati već zbog 5°C niže temperature uz zadržavanje istog nivoa buke (kod obje je to bilo na oko 45 dB) u slučaju 270 modela, i čak 7°C niže temperature u odnosu na Vapor-X.

Rezultati testova – treći dio

Stranica 6 od 7

OGLAS