Toshiba TR200 240 GB recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Mediji · Stranica 4 od 6

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

ATTO Disk Benchmark

Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe398,4Patriot Blaze 240GB358,4OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB321,5OCZ Vector 150 120GB316,6OCZ Vector 180 240GB311,3Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB309,5OCZ Vector 256GB308,2OCZ Vector 180 960GB299,1OCZ Vertex 460 240GB288,8Corsair Force LX 256GB267,3Samsung 850 PRO 256GB266,2Intel SSD 750 400GB263,2Samsung 850 EVO 500GB263,2Transcend SSD370 128GB263,2OCZ ARC 100 240 GB259,5Intel SSD 730 240GB248,8Transcend SSD370 256GB248,2Patriot Pyro 240GB242,7takeMS UTX-PO318239,0Transcend SSD370 512GB233,3Intel DC S3500 480GB232,9OCZ Vertex 450 256GB227,3Crucial MX100 512GB224,7Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB211,4Samsung SM951 256GB @ 2x PCIe204,3AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB201,7Toshiba TR200 240GB156,6ADATA SX8000 512GB148,5ADATA SU800 256GB123,6Intel SSD335 240GB110,0ASUS Hyper Express 256GB95,80438 Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe345,1Patriot Blaze 240GB344,1takeMS UTX-PO318339,1OCZ Vector 180 960GB331,8Patriot Pyro 240GB328,7OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB324,6Intel SSD 750 400GB300,0OCZ Vector 180 240GB293,9Intel SSD 730 240GB285,7Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB273,4OCZ Vertex 460 240GB270,3Intel DC S3500 480GB264,2OCZ Vector 256GB259,4Samsung 850 EVO 500GB248,8Samsung 850 PRO 256GB248,8Corsair Force LX 256GB247,8OCZ ARC 100 240 GB243,1Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB218,1Transcend SSD370 256GB217,1Samsung SM951 256GB @ 2x PCIe210,4Crucial MX100 512GB208,9Transcend SSD370 512GB208,4OCZ Vector 150 120GB195,5AMD Radeon R7 SSD 240GB182,8OCZ Vertex 450 256GB181,6Toshiba TR200 240GB154,9Transcend SSD370 128GB152,6ADATA SX8000 512GB141,6ASUS Hyper Express 256GB118,8ADATA SU800 256GB116,9Intel SSD335 240GB96,00380

4K perfomanse nisu na samom dnu, no nisu ni sjajne. 512K perfromanse su onako kako proizvođač i obećava, 550MB/s za čitanje i 540 MB za zapis.

I/O Meter Mixed Workload

Toshiba TR200 240GB @ Database2.311,5Toshiba TR200 240GB @ FileServer1.413,9Toshiba TR200 240GB @ Workstation2.441,9Toshiba TR200 240GB @ WebServer2.408,002.686 Trion 150 240GB @ Database17.579,9Trion 150 240GB @ FileServer15.718,1Trion 150 240GB @ Workstation16.323,9Trion 150 240GB @ WebServer21.480,5023.000

Rezultati miješanih testova, tj. simulacija četiri načina rada u serverskom okruženju su niski ali konzistentni. U usporedbi s prethodnikom, Trionom 150 su ipak puno slabije, pa je ovaj disk dobar jedino za čistu “kućnu” upotrebu.

POVEZANI ČLANCI