OGLAS

Transcend MTE 240S 1 TB recenzija

· · Mediji · Stranica 3 od 5

Rezultati testova – prvi dio

PCMark10

Kingston KC2000 1TB: 309,95Kingston KC2000 1TB309,95Transcend MTE240S 1TB: 267,1Transcend MTE240S 1TB267,10341

PCMark10 je novi test koji koristimo, a radi na vrlo sličan način kao i stariji PCMark8 samo s novijim stom Microsoftovih i Adobeovih alata. U testu vrtimo Full System Drive benchmark. Za sada radimo usporedbu samo s jednim diskom i kao što vidimo pokazao je nešto niže performanse u odnosu na Kingstonov disk, no rezultat je i dalje vrlo visok.

AIDA64 Read

Transcend MTE240S 1TB: 3.194,7Transcend MTE240S 1TB3.194,7Kingston KC2000 1TB: 2.810,3Kingston KC2000 1TB2.810,3ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB: 2.801,06ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB2.801,06Transcend M.2 110S 256GB: 2.709,5Transcend M.2 110S 256GB2.709,5Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB: 2.674,5Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB2.674,5Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB: 2.667,2Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB2.667,2ADATA Gammix S11 240GB: 2.651,7ADATA Gammix S11 240GB2.651,7ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB: 2.553,9ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB2.553,9Intel SSD 750 400GB: 2.000,0Intel SSD 750 400GB2.000,0OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB: 2.000,0OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB2.000,0Transcend 220S 512GB: 1.873,1Transcend 220S 512GB1.873,1Kingston KC1000 480GB: 1.765,33Kingston KC1000 480GB1.765,33ADATA SX8000 512GB: 1.635,6ADATA SX8000 512GB1.635,6Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe: 1.536,9Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x P…1.536,9ADATA SX6000 Pro 256 GB: 1.157,87ADATA SX6000 Pro 256 GB1.157,8703.514
Transcend MTE240S 1TB: 3.197,7Transcend MTE240S 1TB3.197,7Kingston KC2000 1TB: 2.797,0Kingston KC2000 1TB2.797,0Transcend M.2 110S 256GB: 2.708Transcend M.2 110S 256GB2.708Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB: 2.666Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB2.666ADATA Gammix S11 240GB: 2.659,1ADATA Gammix S11 240GB2.659,1Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB: 2.615,22Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB2.615,22ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB: 2.398,1ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB2.398,1ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB: 2.300,7ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB2.300,7OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB: 2.160,1OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB2.160,1Intel SSD 750 400GB: 2.048,2Intel SSD 750 400GB2.048,2Kingston KC1000 480GB: 1.907,3Kingston KC1000 480GB1.907,3Transcend 220S 512GB: 1.853,4Transcend 220S 512GB1.853,4Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe: 1.727,2Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x P…1.727,2ADATA SX8000 512GB: 1.635,5ADATA SX8000 512GB1.635,5ADATA SX6000 Pro 256 GB: 1.004,5ADATA SX6000 Pro 256 GB1.004,503.517

Izvrsne performanse, onako kako je to proizvođač i obećao. Prosječno vrijeme pristupa kod čitanja je odličnih 0.1 milisekundu.

AIDA64 Write

Transcend MTE240S 1TB: 1.504,1Transcend MTE240S 1TB1.504,1Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB: 1.497,6Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB1.497,6Kingston KC2000 1TB: 1.290,9Kingston KC2000 1TB1.290,9Intel SSD 750 400GB: 938,8Intel SSD 750 400GB938,8OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB: 922,8OCZ RevoDrive 350 480GB922,8Kingston KC1000 480GB: 908,4Kingston KC1000 480GB908,4Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB: 796Patriot Hellfire M.2 240GB796ADATA Gammix S11 240GB: 683,7ADATA Gammix S11 240GB683,7ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB: 677,8ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB677,8ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB: 619,9ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB619,9Transcend 220S 512GB: 561,4Transcend 220S 512GB561,4ADATA SX8000 512GB: 544,4ADATA SX8000 512GB544,401.500
Transcend MTE240S 1TB: 1.247,6Transcend MTE240S 1TB1.247,6Transcend 220S 512GB: 1.106Transcend 220S 512GB1.106ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB: 1.073,3ADATA XPG SX8200 480GB1.073,3Kingston KC2000 1TB: 1.028,8Kingston KC2000 1TB1.028,8Intel SSD 750 400GB: 981,4Intel SSD 750 400GB981,4ADATA Gammix S11 240GB: 870,4ADATA Gammix S11 240GB870,4Kingston KC1000 480GB: 865,8Kingston KC1000 480GB865,8Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB: 834,8Toshiba OCZ RD400 512GB834,8Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x PCIe: 794,2Samsung SM951 256GB @ 4x P…794,2ADATA SX8000 512GB: 635,1ADATA SX8000 512GB635,1Transcend M.2 110S 256GB: 565,3Transcend M.2 110S 256GB565,3ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB: 524,9ADATA Spectrix S40G 512GB524,901.200

Test zapisa kod AIDA-inog testa je vrlo zahtjevan jer piše na cijeli disk i ovdje se odlično vidi što se dešava u trenutku kada se popuni priručna memorija, tj. kako kontroler radi. Performanse u linearnom zapisu variraju između 185 MB/s i 3.1 GB/s, a prosjek je i dalje odličnih 1.5 GB/s. Kod nasumičnog zapisa je situacija slična, s tim da se pad performansi dešava tek iznad 50% zapisanog diska, ali prosjek je i dalje odličan. Prosječno vrijeme pristupa kod zapisa je odličnih 0.2 milisekunde.

Rezultati testova – prvi dio

Stranica 3 od 5

OGLAS