Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Mobilno · Stranica 2 od 3

Rezultati testova

Sintetika

PCMark 10

PCMark 10Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY)12.618,0Razer Blade 14 (2023)8.059,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G147.660,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2023)7.603,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S177.253,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE7.185,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 177.176,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF7.062,0Asus ROG Strix G166.384,0Dell XPS 17 97106.342,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC6.280,0Dell XPS 15 95206.273,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC6.032,0Dell G7 77005.795,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED5.623,0Asus Asus TUF Gaming A155.541,0Dell Precision 75305.203,0Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H)5.181,0Dell G5 55905.135,0Asus G531GU5.064,0Dell XPS 15 95005.037,0Asus ZenBook Duo 144.948,0Dell XPS 17 97004.909,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED4.894,0Dell G7 77904.768,0Dell Vostro 35004.605,0Asus UX580GE4.330,0Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H)4.309,0Dell Latitude 55004.306,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H)4.256,0Dell Vostro 35804.167,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H)4.132,0Dell Inspiron 73863.969,0Dell Latitude 95103.963,0Dell XPS 13 93803.889,0Dell Latitude 74903.562,0Dell XPS 13 93652.192,0013.880

Sasvim solidan rezultat za Neo 16 koji je u skladu s onim što smo vidjeli kod konkurencije.

3DMark Time Spy

3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 409020.355,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 407012.490,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX407011.651,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 407010.818,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 406010.815,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 308010.240,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S8.861,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ8.068,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.867,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ7.242,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ6.975,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti4.793,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe1.835,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – Iris Xe1.527,0022.391

3DMark Port Royal

3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 409013.080,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 40707.165,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX40707.063,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 40706.725,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 30806.698,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 30806.328,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 40605.882,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M5.515,0Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.700,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.017,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX6800S3.923,0014.388

3DMark Speed Way

3DMark Speed WayAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 40905.358,0Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC5.156,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 40702.903,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 40702.723,005.894

Grafički testovi pokazuju da je RTX 4070 u Neo 16 malo sporija nego kod primjerice Strixa G16.

3DMark CPU

3DMark CPU ProfileCore i7-14700K14.381,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 -i9-14900HX11.650,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX9.033,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS7.291,0015.819

Ovdje nemamo puno procesora za usporedbu no vidimo da 14900HX ne uspijeva držati korak s desktop 14700K modelom.

Performanse u igrama

Company of Heroes 3

Company of Heroes 3 (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G16156,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 16136,0Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17128,8Sapphire RX 7600 Pulse OC127,2Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Blade 1499,60172

F1 22

F1 22 (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G16211,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 16174,00232

Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 1920 x 1080)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17176,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G16126,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Blade 14119,0Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17106,0Nvidia RTX 3080 @ SCAR 1797,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 1694,0Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G1593,0AMD Radeon RX 6800S @ Zephyrus G1492,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aorus 15G KC76,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aero 15 KC73,0RTX 2070 Super63,0GTX1650 Ti31,00194

The Calisto Protocol

The Calisto Protocol (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G1681,0RTX 4070 @ Blade 1480,4Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 1679,1RTX 4060 @ Aorus 1771,0089

Igre smo testirali u 1080p rezoluciji kako bi performanse bile usporedive. Pokazalo se kako je RTX 4070 u Neo 16 prijenosniku dosta sporija u većini slučajeva nego kod Strix G16 prijenosnika, no to može biti i do neoptimiziranih drivera. Naime, primjerak prijenosnika koji smo imali je bio inženjerski pa je moguće da će finalni primjerci još dobiti ponešto grafičkih performansi.

CPU Performanse

Cinebench 23

Cinebench 23 Multicore CPURyzen 9 7950X37.776,0Core i7-14700K35.503,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX32.274,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX28.895,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX20.427,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H15.962,0Ryzen 5 7600X15.409,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS15.115,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U5.808,0041.554 Cinebench 23 Single Core CPUAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX2.212,0Core i7-14700K2.187,002.433

Ovdje vidimo da su single core performanse sasvim usporedive s desktop i7-14700K procesorom, dok ga u multi core testu ipak ne može stići i usporediv je s Ryzenom 9 7900X – što je i dalje vrlo respektabilan rezultat. No, nedovoljan da dostigne Ryzena 9 7945HX.

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K68,2Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzn 9 7945HX77,7Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX95,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX122,1Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H154,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS167,2Ryzen 9 5900HX176,7Core i9-11900H181,7Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17182,2AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus ROG Zephyrus G14185,0Ryzen 7 4800H228,0Ryzen 7 3700X233,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK237,3Core i7 10750H258,1Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7 10870H275,7i5-10600K301,7Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U451,30496 Blender Gooseberry Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K317,8Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX474,3Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX901,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS1.158,101.274

I u Blender BWM testu vidimo da ne može stići Ryzena 9 7945HX, a opet je dosta sporiji od 14700K. U Gooseberryu je brz, no opet nedovoljno za desktop i7-14700K.

Handbrake

Handbrake (FPS)Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX88,8Core i7-14700K79,5098

Ovdje je ipak nešto brži od desktop i7-14700K procesora.

 

VRay

Vray (score)Core i7-14700K35.889,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX26.384,0039.478

I ovdje opet ne može dosegnuti i7-14700K.

Memorijske performanse 

AIDA Memory

AIDA Memory – ReadAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560084.544,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480067.783,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480067.240,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80063.180,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560061.175,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480059.126,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.666,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20047.154,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR546.644,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.936,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.504,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00041.081,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.979,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.898,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99338.500,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.827,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.721,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293337.280,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266635.413,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.425,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240032.884,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.876,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66729.969,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213329.688,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.488,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.827,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L27.155,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213326.830,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320024.509,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.290,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L23.120,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L21.151,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L19.772,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L18.210,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.787,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.639,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.292,0092.998 AIDA Memory – WriteRazer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560077.484,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR574.078,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80071.123,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560066.366,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480060.204,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480059.499,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480057.583,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480055.150,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.592,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00044.859,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293344.706,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.098,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93340.291,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99339.635,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93339.627,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.798,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266637.621,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.124,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240034.834,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.035,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66733.310,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.951,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213331.835,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L31.531,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20031.460,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213331.017,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213328.479,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L26.818,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L24.970,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.893,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320023.107,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L19.776,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.929,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.815,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L17.759,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.439,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L14.544,0085.232 AIDA Memory – copyAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560077.918,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80064.509,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560061.611,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480060.167,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR559.159,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480058.908,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.082,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480048.811,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20041.091,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00040.090,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20040.025,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293338.128,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20036.926,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93335.188,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93334.508,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99333.186,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266632.709,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66732.163,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.871,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.333,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240030.654,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.712,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99329.405,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213328.446,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66727.379,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.082,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L26.430,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213325.618,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.606,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.296,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320022.232,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L20.839,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L19.047,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.016,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.863,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.798,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.220,0085.710

Propusnost memorijskog podsustava je očekivano vrlo visoka zbog korištenja brze dvokanalne DDR5 memorije.

SSD performanse

Čitanje

ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 1612.400,0Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB6.533,0Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 146.210,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB6.030,0Micron 3400 1TB – Zenbook S 13 OLED5.930,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.950,0Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G164.380,0Micron 2450 1TB3.440,0Toshiba 1TB3.340,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.200,0WDC SN730 1TB2.970,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920,0Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730,0Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35002.210,0Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,2SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,6Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,7ST1000LM035120,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,4102,0013.640

Zapis

ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 169.720,0Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB5.221,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB4.770,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.620,0Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 144.610,0Micron 2450 1TB4.600,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.950,0Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G163.380,0WDC SN730 1TB3.080,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.830,0Toshiba 1TB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.460,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.350,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.280,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.210,0Kioxia XG6 1TB1.690,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.600,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.480,0WDC PC SN520 @ G31.460,0WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.370,0Kioxia BG4 512GB1.340,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35001.330,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.310,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.210,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F1.080,0Toshiba BG3 256GB932,7SK Hynix PC401 512GB690,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G636,1SK Hynix SC311 256GB540,0Toshiba BG3 512GB349,5Toshiba MQ04ABF100344,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3102,0ST1000LM03596,685,9010.692

Naravno, performanse dva SSD-a u RAID 0 polju kao što je Samsung PM9A1 su očekivano izvrsne. Acer je ovdje išao na brzinu, a ne sigurnost pa je učitavanje svega vrlo brzo, no ako držite osjetljive podatke svakako ih redovito spremajte negdje van prijenosnika.

Autonomija

4K@30fps playbackDell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh634,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 63 Wh557,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63Wh435,0Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – 99 Wh396,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 90 Wh390,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76 Wh390,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh359,0Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh346,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh345,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh332,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh323,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh318,0Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh312,0Razer Blade 14 – 68 Wh302,0Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh274,0Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh272,0G531GU – 67 Wh256,0G3 3590 – 51 Wh255,0G5 5590 – 60 Wh239,0Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh237,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – 90 Wh232,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 90Wh229,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh221,0Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh184,00963

Baterija kapaciteta 90 Wh uz ovako moćan hardver ne osigurava iznimnu autonomiju, a uz igranje igara baterija će se isprazniti za manje od sat vremena.

POVEZANI ČLANCI