OGLAS

Acer Swift X 14 (2024) recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Mobilno · Stranica 2 od 3

Rezultati testova

Sintetika

3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 4090: 20.355Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RT…20.355Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4070: 12.490Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4…12.490Razer Blade 14 – RTX4070: 11.651Razer Blade 14 – RTX407011.651Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080: 10.903Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RT…10.903Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 4070: 10.818Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…10.818Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 4060: 10.815Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RT…10.815Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M: 10.606Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ra…10.606Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 3080: 10.240Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – R…10.240Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S: 8.861Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AM…8.861Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 4060: 8.068Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40608.068Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ: 7.872Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RT…7.872Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ: 7.867Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX…7.867Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super: 7.242Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Su…7.242Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ: 6.975Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ6.975Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ: 6.855Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 306…6.855MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X: 6.757MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ: 6.516Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 2060: 6.083Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX…6.083Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti: 5.368Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ: 5.109Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti M…5.109Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti: 4.793Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 305…4.793Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti: 3.831Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650…3.831Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti: 3.653Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 165…3.653Dell G3 3590 – GTX 1650: 3.639Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639Asus Zenbook Duo (2024) – Intel Arc: 3.201Asus Zenbook Duo (2024) -…3.201Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe: 1.835Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Ir…1.835Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe: 1.786Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris…1.786Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – Iris Xe: 1.527Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – I…1.527022.391
3DMark Port Royal
3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 4090: 13.080Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G7…13.080Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4070: 7.165Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4…7.165Razer Blade 14 – RTX4070: 7.063Razer Blade 14 – RTX40707.063Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 4070: 6.725Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…6.725Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080: 6.698Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RT…6.698Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 3080: 6.328Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – R…6.328Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 4060: 5.882Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RT…5.882Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M: 5.515Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ra…5.515Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB: 5.220Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ: 4.700Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RT…4.700Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ: 4.017Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 306…4.017Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX6800S: 3.923Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AM…3.923Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 4060: 3.819Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40603.819014.388
3DMark Speed Way
3DMark Speed WayAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 4090: 5.358Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G7…5.358Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC: 5.156Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Gamin…5.156Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4070: 2.903Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4…2.903Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 4070: 2.723Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…2.723Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 4060: 1.626Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40601.62605.894
Grafičke performanse mobilne RTX 4060 kartice su u osnovi sasvim solidne i omogućavaju igranje modernih igara na 1080p rezoluciji u srednjoj razini kvalitete. Na Ray Tracing treba zaboraviti. Ipak, u prvom i drugom testu vidimo kako su performanse RTX 4060 kartice u ovom prijenosniku dosta niže nego recimo u Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF koji ima znatno bolje riješeno hlađenje i puno deblju šasiju. Stoga će i igre biti nešto usporene i ne treba računati na performanse kao kod gamerskih prijenosnika. 3DMark CPU
3DMark CPU ProfileCore i7-14700K: 14.381Core i7-14700K14.381Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 -i9-14900HX: 11.650Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…11.650Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX: 9.033Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13…9.033Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H: 7.574Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ult…7.574Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS: 7.291Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7…7.291Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H: 5.495Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ul…5.495015.819
Performanse procesora su pak znatno drugačije nego grafičke. On je bolje hlađen i ovdje vidimo kako je jači od Ryzena 9 7940HS, ali i od Core 9 Ultra 185H u iznimno tankom Zenbooku Duo 14 OLED.

CPU Performanse

Cinebench 23
Cinebench 23 Multicore CPURyzen 9 7950X: 37.776Ryzen 9 7950X37.776Core i7-14700K: 35.503Core i7-14700K35.503Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX: 32.274Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9…32.274Ryzen 9 7900X: 29.303Ryzen 9 7900X29.303Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX: 28.895Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…28.895Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX: 20.427Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13…20.427Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H: 15.962Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i…15.962Ryzen 5 7600X: 15.409Ryzen 5 7600X15.409Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS: 15.115Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7…15.115Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H: 13.714Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ult…13.714Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H: 12.986Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ul…12.986Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U: 5.808Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i…5.808041.554
Cinebench 23 Single Core CPUAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX: 2.212Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…2.212Core i7-14700K: 2.187Core i7-14700K2.187Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H: 1.806Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ul…1.806Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H: 1.736Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ult…1.73602.433
Opet nešto više performanse 155H modela u odnosu na 185H govore koliko je hlađenje bitno i kako bi 155H možda bio sasvim dovoljan u Asusovom prijenosniku. Blender
Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K: 68,21Core i7-14700K68,21Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzn 9 7945HX: 77,71Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzn 9…77,71Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX: 94,97Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…94,97Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX: 122,07Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13…122,07Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H: 154,55Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i…154,55Ryzen 9 3900X: 157,37Ryzen 9 3900X157,37Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS: 167,22Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7…167,22Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H: 170,21Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ult…170,21Ryzen 9 5900HX: 176,69Ryzen 9 5900HX176,69Core i9-11900H: 181,74Core i9-11900H181,74Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17: 182,24Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG…182,24AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus ROG Zephyrus G14: 185AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus…185Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H: 212,81Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ul…212,81Ryzen 7 4800H: 227,99Ryzen 7 4800H227,99Ryzen 7 3700X: 232,95Ryzen 7 3700X232,95Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK: 237,32Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-1290…237,32Core i7 10750H: 258,08Core i7 10750H258,08Ryzen 7 2700X: 264,82Ryzen 7 2700X264,82i7 10870H: 275,74i7 10870H275,74i5-10600K: 301,74i5-10600K301,74Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U: 451,25Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i…451,250496
Blender Gooseberry Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K: 317,84Core i7-14700K317,84Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX: 474,33Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…474,33Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX: 900,97Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13…900,97Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H: 949,93Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ult…949,93Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS: 1.158,09Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7…1.158,09Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H: 1.450,02Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ul…1.450,0201.595
U Blender testovima ponovno ista situacija, 155H s boljim hlađenjem je puno brži od 185H, što se pogotovo osjeti u dugotrajnijem testu. Handbrake
Handbrake (FPS)Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX: 88,77Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…88,77Core i7-14700K: 79,48Core i7-14700K79,48Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H: 58,19Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ult…58,19Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H: 46,15Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ul…46,15098
I za kraj transkodiranje gdje 155H opet pokazuje sasvim solidne performanse.

SSD performanse

Čitanje
ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 16: 12.400Samsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo…12.400Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift X 14: 6.620Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift…6.620Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB: 6.533Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB6.533Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 14: 6.210Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 146.210Samsung PM9A1 2TB: 6.030Samsung PM9A1 2TB6.030Micron 3400 1TB – Zenbook S 13 OLED: 5.930Micron 3400 1TB – Zenbook…5.930Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 17: 4.950Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.950Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G16: 4.380Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G…4.380Micron 2450 1TB: 3.440Micron 2450 1TB3.440Toshiba 1TB: 3.340Toshiba 1TB3.340SKHynix PC711 1TB: 3.200SKHynix PC711 1TB3.200WDC SN730 1TB: 2.970WDC SN730 1TB2.970SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G7: 2.950SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950Kingston OM8PCP3512F: 2.920Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 15: 2.920SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920Toshiba XG6 512GB: 2.900Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900Samsung PM991a 512 GB: 2.810Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810Gigabyte SSD 512GB: 2.750Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750Samsung PM981a 1TB: 2.730Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730Kioxia XG6 1TB: 2.710Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710Samsung 960 Evo 1TB: 2.473,4Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G3: 2.350Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350Toshiba BG4 256 GB: 2.220Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 3500: 2.210Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro…2.210Kioxia BG4 512GB: 2.170Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170SK Hynix PC401 512GB: 2.080SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080Toshiba BG3 512GB: 1.521,9Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G3: 1.480,1WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB: 1.440WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440Toshiba BG3 256GB: 1.370Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370Toshiba BG3 512GB: 1.340Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340Toshiba BG3 256GB: 1.340Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340Toshiba BG3 512GB: 1.210Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G: 1.040,22Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,22SK Hynix SC311 256GB: 741,61SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,61Toshiba MQ04ABF100: 563,66Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,66ST1000LM035: 120ST1000LM035120WDC WD10SPZX @ G3: 104,38WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,38: 102102013.640
Zapis
ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 16: 9.720Samsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo…9.720Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB: 5.221Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB5.221Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift X 14: 4.820Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift…4.820Samsung PM9A1 2TB: 4.770Samsung PM9A1 2TB4.770Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 17: 4.620Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.620Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 14: 4.610Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 144.610Micron 2450 1TB: 4.600Micron 2450 1TB4.600SKHynix PC711 1TB: 3.950SKHynix PC711 1TB3.950Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G16: 3.380Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G…3.380WDC SN730 1TB: 3.080WDC SN730 1TB3.080Samsung PM981a 1TB: 2.830Samsung PM981a 1TB2.830Toshiba 1TB: 2.810Toshiba 1TB2.810Gigabyte SSD 512GB: 2.460Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.460SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 15: 2.350SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.350Samsung 960 Evo 1TB: 2.280Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.280SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G7: 2.210SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.210Kioxia XG6 1TB: 1.690Kioxia XG6 1TB1.690Samsung PM991a 512 GB: 1.600Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.600Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G3: 1.480Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.480WDC PC SN520 @ G3: 1.460WDC PC SN520 @ G31.460WDC PC SN520 256 GB: 1.370WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.370Kioxia BG4 512GB: 1.340Kioxia BG4 512GB1.340Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 3500: 1.330Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro…1.330Toshiba BG3 256GB: 1.310Toshiba BG3 256GB1.310Toshiba BG4 256 GB: 1.210Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.210Kingston OM8PCP3512F: 1.080Kingston OM8PCP3512F1.080Toshiba BG3 256GB: 932,72Toshiba BG3 256GB932,72SK Hynix PC401 512GB: 690SK Hynix PC401 512GB690Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G: 636,1Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G636,1SK Hynix SC311 256GB: 540SK Hynix SC311 256GB540Toshiba BG3 512GB: 349,52Toshiba BG3 512GB349,52Toshiba MQ04ABF100: 344Toshiba MQ04ABF100344WDC WD10SPZX @ G3: 102WDC WD10SPZX @ G3102ST1000LM035: 96,6ST1000LM03596,6: 85,9185,91010.692
Samsungov PM9A1a očekivano ima visoke performanse.

Autonomija

4K@30fps playbackDell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh: 875Dell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh: 634Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90…634Asus Zenbook Duo – 75 Wh: 612Asus Zenbook Duo – 75 Wh612Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 63 Wh: 557Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 6…557Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh: 518Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh: 470Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh: 465Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63Wh: 435Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63…435Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh: 409Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409Gigabyte Aorus 17 – 99 Wh: 396Gigabyte Aorus 17 – 99 Wh396Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 90 Wh: 390Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 9…390Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76 Wh: 390Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76…390Acer Swift X 14 – 76Wh: 389Acer Swift X 14 – 76Wh389Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh: 375Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh: 374Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh: 367Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh: 359Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90…359Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh: 346Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh346Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh: 345Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99…345Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh: 332Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh332Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh: 323Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh323Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh: 318Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh318Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh: 312Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh312Razer Blade 14 – 68 Wh: 302Razer Blade 14 – 68 Wh302Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh: 274Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh274Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh: 272Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh272G531GU – 67 Wh: 256G531GU – 67 Wh256G3 3590 – 51 Wh: 255G3 3590 – 51 Wh255G5 5590 – 60 Wh: 239G5 5590 – 60 Wh239Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh: 237Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh237Asus ROG Strix G16 – 90 Wh: 232Asus ROG Strix G16 – 90 Wh232Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 90Wh: 229Acer Predator Helios Neo 1…229Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh: 221Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh221Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh: 184Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh1840963
Baterija kapaciteta 76 Wh je dovoljna za oko 6,5 sati autonomije ovoga prijenosnika što i nije sjajno. OLED je dosta veliki potrošač pa za kvalitetu slike očito moramo platiti autonomijom. Ako radite lagani uredski posao možete očekivati do jednog radnog dana ili 8 sati autonomije, no to je to.

Zagrijavanje i buka

acer_swift_x_14_15
 
acer_swift_x_14_14

Swift X 14 ima samo jedan ventilator koji proizvodi dosta visoku buku, pa smo tako izmjerili čak 48,6 dB(A) pri maksimalnom opterećenju procesora. Sama se radna površina ne zagrijava previši i najtoplija je iznad funkcijskih tipaka s 41,1°C. Tipkovnica je na cijelom području ispod 40°C. No, zbog takvog rashladnog sustava samo s jednim ventilatorom grafičke su performanse kao što smo vidjeli u 3DMark testovima malo ograničene i RTX 4060 ne ostvaruje svoj puni potencijal kao kod nekih debljih, igrački orijentiranih prijenosnika. Stoga je Swift X 14 pogodniji za rad i korištenje grafike u svrhu obrade fotografija i videa, nego za igranje – što ne znači da ne može sasvim solidno potjerati i kakvu igru.

Rezultati testova

Stranica 2 od 3

POVEZANI ČLANCI

OGLAS