AMD Athlon 3000G recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 5

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL Benchmark testovi

PCMark 10Ryzen 5 2400G4.355,0Ryzen 3 2200G4.251,0Athlon 3000G3.347,0Athlon 200GE3.280,0A10-7680K2.400,004.791

Prvi je test kao i uvijek do sada PCMark 10 koji mjeri općenite performanse sistema. 3000G je kao što vidimo samo malo brži od 200GE i to za oko 2%. Očekivali smo malo veću razliku s obzirom na to da je su i  CPU i GPU ubrzani.

3DMark Time SpyRyzen 5 2400G1.251,0Ryzen 3 2200G1.000,0Athlon 3000G482,0Athlon 200GE438,001.376 3DMark Fire StrikeGigabyte GTX1050 G1 Gaming 2GB OC7.076,0Gigabyte RX560 Gaming 2GB OC6.289,0Ryzen 5 2400G3.203,0Ryzen 3 2200G2.700,0A10-7680K1.892,0Athlon 3000G1.390,0Athlon 200GE1.296,007.784

U prvom je grafičkom testu je 3000G brži za oko 10%, a u drugom za 7,25%. Solidan je ovo pokazatelj koliko će performanse rasti, no i dalje vrijedi da je ovaj procesor adekvatan tek za igranje u 1366 x 768 rezoluciji s najnižim postavkama.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPRyzen 5 1600X32.093,0i7-5820K31.261,0Ryzen 5 160031.200,0i7-980X29.058,0i7-3930K28.938,0i7-7700K28.583,0i5-8600K28.294,0i7-6700K26.328,0i7-4790K26.327,0i7-3770K24.437,0i7-4770K23.564,0Ryzen 5 1500X22.909,0Ryzen 5 2400G21.251,0FX-815020.957,0i7-2600K20.101,0Ryzen 5 140020.016,0i5-4690K18.528,0i5-6600K18.155,0i5-4670K17.203,0i5-750016.598,0Ryzen 3 1300X14.896,0Ryzen 3 2200G14.871,0Athlon 3000G14.629,0i5-2500K14.254,0Athlon 200GE13.585,0Ryzen 3 120012.560,0035.302

3000G je u 7-Zipu za oko 7,7% brži od 200GE što je malo manje od 9,37% porasta takta (3,5 vs. 3,2 GHz).

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)i5-8600K406,6Ryzen 5 2400G571,9Ryzen 3 2200G874,2Athlon 200GE1.320,2Athlon 3000G1.327,801.461

Zanimljivo, no u Blenderu je 3000G čak nešto sporiji od 200GE unatoč 300 MHz većem taktu. Ovo ćemo pripisati neispeglanom BIOS-u, premda smo praćenjem HWInfo64 parametara primijetili da je procesor cijelo vrijeme s obje jezgre na 3,5 GHz.

Cinebench 15Ryzen 5 1600X1.241,0Ryzen 5 16001.129,0i7-5930K1.101,0i7-5820K1.074,0i5-8600K1.030,0i7-7700K989,0i7-6700K935,0Ryzen 5 2400G829,0Ryzen 5 1500X814,0Ryzen 5 1400703,0i5-6600K651,0i3-8100604,0i5-7500596,0Ryzen 3 2200G567,0Ryzen 3 1300X558,0Ryzen 3 1200482,0i3-7350K445,0Athlon 3000G377,0Athlon 200GE357,001.365

Ovdje je porast samo 5,6%, no ipak je porast.

TrueCrypt v7.1i5-8600K5,5i7-3960X5,4i7-6700K5,2i7-4790K5,2Ryzen 5 1500X4,8i7-4770K4,5Ryzen 5 14004,3Ryzen 5 2400G4,2i5-6600K3,4i5-4670K3,3FX-81503,3i5-4690K3,3i5-75003,2i7-3770K3,2Ryzen 3 1300X3,1i5-2500K2,8Ryzen 3 2200G2,6Athlon 200GE2,2Athlon 3000G2,2Ryzen 3 12002,106

U True Cryptu razlike nema, što je ponovno čudno.

wPrime 2.0i7-6700K178,3i7-4790K186,5i7-4770K195,2i7-3770K198,1Ryzen 5 2400G203,4Ryzen 5 1500X213,5i7-2600K225,0Ryzen 5 1400237,5FX-8150276,0i5-6600K277,7i5-4670K285,4i5-7500301,0i5-2500K321,6Ryzen 3 2200G329,3Ryzen 3 1300X334,0Ryzen 3 1200389,5Athlon 200GE476,0Athlon 3000G487,00536

Vrlo čudno, no ovdje je 3000G sporiji za 6% od 200GE.