OGLAS

AMD Radeon R9 Nano test

· · Video · Stranica 4 od 7

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

Sniper Elite 3 (2560 @ 1440 @ Ultra)AMD R9 295X2: 182,8AMD R9 295X2182,8AMD Radeon R9 Fury X: 145,6AMD Radeon R9 Fury X145,6Nvidia GTX980 Ti: 144,5Nvidia GTX980 Ti144,5Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X: 132,6Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X132,6AMD R9 Nano: 124,9AMD R9 Nano124,9ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX980: 116,6ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX980116,6Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI: 114,9Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI114,9Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X: 113,4Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X113,4MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G: 110,3MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G110,3Sapphire R9 390 Nitro: 104,2Sapphire R9 390 Nitro104,2Gainward GTX970 Phantom: 93,6Gainward GTX970 Phantom93,6Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G1: 92,1Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G192,1Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC: 91,2Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC91,2Sapphire R9 290X 8GB: 89,5Sapphire R9 290X 8GB89,5Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB: 88,9Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB88,90201

U Sniperu je Nano nešto iznad GTX980 a tu ima i prednost Mantlea, te je očekivano nešto ispod Fury kartice.

Thief (2560 @ 1440 @ Very High, 16xAF)AMD R9 295X2: 81,4AMD R9 295X281,4AMD Radeon R9 Fury X: 71,6AMD Radeon R9 Fury X71,6Nvidia GTX980 Ti: 69,2Nvidia GTX980 Ti69,2Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X: 68,4Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X68,4AMD R9 Nano: 66AMD R9 Nano66ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX980: 57,6ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX98057,6Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X: 57,40Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X57,40MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G: 57,0MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G57,0Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB: 56,4Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB56,4Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC: 54,8Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC54,8Sapphire R9 390 Nitro: 53,3Sapphire R9 390 Nitro53,3Sapphire R9 290X 8GB: 52,5Sapphire R9 290X 8GB52,5Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI: 52,1Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI52,1ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti: 51ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX78…51Nvidia GTX980: 50,1Nvidia GTX98050,1Gainward GTX970 Phantom: 48,6Gainward GTX970 Phantom48,6Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G1: 48,5Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G148,5AMD Radeon R9 290: 44,1AMD Radeon R9 29044,1Asus GTX780 STRIX OC: 41,8Asus GTX780 STRIX OC41,8090

I u Thief podržava Mantle i ovdje Nano ima dosta bolje performanse od GTX980, a i dosta je blizu Fury-u.

Ashes of Singularity DX11 (1920 x 1200 @ High preset)Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X: 34,1Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X34,1AMD R9 Nano: 32,7AMD R9 Nano32,7AMD R9 295X2: 28,5AMD R9 295X228,5AMD R9 290: 26,8AMD R9 29026,8038

Ashes of Singularity benchmark služi za testiranje DX11 vs. DX12 performansi a još uvijek mu neke stvari fale kao CFX podrška. Ovdje smo više sramežljivo pokazali performanse kartica koje su nam bile pri ruci i to u DX11, dok se pravi testovi očekuju s punim izlaskom igre. High postavke i na nižoj 1920 x 1200 rezoluciji poprilično opterete kartice pa framerate nije obećavajuć.

Overclocking

3DMark FirestrikeAMD R9 Nano @ OC: 13.255AMD R9 Nano @ OC13.255AMD R9 Nano: 12.315AMD R9 Nano12.315014.581
Alien IsolationAMD R9 Nano @ OC: 108,85AMD R9 Nano @ OC108,85AMD R9 Nano: 102,38AMD R9 Nano102,380120
Company of Heroes 2AMD R9 Nano @ OC: 50,33AMD R9 Nano @ OC50,33AMD R9 Nano: 46,73AMD R9 Nano46,73055
ThiefAMD R9 Nano @ OC: 68,7AMD R9 Nano @ OC68,7AMD R9 Nano: 66AMD R9 Nano66076

Overclocking je donio otprilike 6% ubrzanja što nije loše, a možda će biti korisno pri 4K igranju.

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

Stranica 4 od 7

OGLAS