Rezultati testova – drugi dio
Sniper Elite 3 (2560 @ 1440 @ Ultra) AMD R9 295X2: 182,8 AMD R9 295X2 182,8 AMD Radeon R9 Fury X: 145,6 AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 145,6 Nvidia GTX980 Ti: 144,5 Nvidia GTX980 Ti 144,5 Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X: 132,6 Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X 132,6 AMD R9 Nano: 124,9 AMD R9 Nano 124,9 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX980: 116,6 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX980 116,6 Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI: 114,9 Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI 114,9 Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X: 113,4 Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X 113,4 MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G: 110,3 MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G 110,3 Sapphire R9 390 Nitro: 104,2 Sapphire R9 390 Nitro 104,2 Gainward GTX970 Phantom: 93,6 Gainward GTX970 Phantom 93,6 Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G1: 92,1 Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G1 92,1 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC: 91,2 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC 91,2 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB: 89,5 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB 89,5 Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB: 88,9 Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB 88,9 0 201
U Sniperu je Nano nešto iznad GTX980 a tu ima i prednost Mantlea, te je očekivano nešto ispod Fury kartice.
Thief (2560 @ 1440 @ Very High, 16xAF) AMD R9 295X2: 81,4 AMD R9 295X2 81,4 AMD Radeon R9 Fury X: 71,6 AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 71,6 Nvidia GTX980 Ti: 69,2 Nvidia GTX980 Ti 69,2 Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X: 68,4 Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X 68,4 AMD R9 Nano: 66 AMD R9 Nano 66 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX980: 57,6 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX980 57,6 Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X: 57,40 Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X 57,40 MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G: 57,0 MSI GTX980 Gaming 4G 57,0 Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB: 56,4 Sapphire R9 290X Tri-X 8GB 56,4 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC: 54,8 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC 54,8 Sapphire R9 390 Nitro: 53,3 Sapphire R9 390 Nitro 53,3 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB: 52,5 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB 52,5 Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI: 52,1 Gigabyte GTX960 G1 @ SLI 52,1 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti: 51 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX78… 51 Nvidia GTX980: 50,1 Nvidia GTX980 50,1 Gainward GTX970 Phantom: 48,6 Gainward GTX970 Phantom 48,6 Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G1: 48,5 Gigabyte GTX970 Gaming G1 48,5 AMD Radeon R9 290: 44,1 AMD Radeon R9 290 44,1 Asus GTX780 STRIX OC: 41,8 Asus GTX780 STRIX OC 41,8 0 90
I u Thief podržava Mantle i ovdje Nano ima dosta bolje performanse od GTX980, a i dosta je blizu Fury-u.
Ashes of Singularity DX11 (1920 x 1200 @ High preset) Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X: 34,1 Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X 34,1 AMD R9 Nano: 32,7 AMD R9 Nano 32,7 AMD R9 295X2: 28,5 AMD R9 295X2 28,5 AMD R9 290: 26,8 AMD R9 290 26,8 0 38
Ashes of Singularity benchmark služi za testiranje DX11 vs. DX12 performansi a još uvijek mu neke stvari fale kao CFX podrška. Ovdje smo više sramežljivo pokazali performanse kartica koje su nam bile pri ruci i to u DX11, dok se pravi testovi očekuju s punim izlaskom igre. High postavke i na nižoj 1920 x 1200 rezoluciji poprilično opterete kartice pa framerate nije obećavajuć.
Overclocking
3DMark Firestrike AMD R9 Nano @ OC: 13.255 AMD R9 Nano @ OC 13.255 AMD R9 Nano: 12.315 AMD R9 Nano 12.315 0 14.581
Alien Isolation AMD R9 Nano @ OC: 108,85 AMD R9 Nano @ OC 108,85 AMD R9 Nano: 102,38 AMD R9 Nano 102,38 0 120
Company of Heroes 2 AMD R9 Nano @ OC: 50,33 AMD R9 Nano @ OC 50,33 AMD R9 Nano: 46,73 AMD R9 Nano 46,73 0 55
Thief AMD R9 Nano @ OC: 68,7 AMD R9 Nano @ OC 68,7 AMD R9 Nano: 66 AMD R9 Nano 66 0 76
Overclocking je donio otprilike 6% ubrzanja što nije loše, a možda će biti korisno pri 4K igranju.