AMD Ryzen 5 1600 & 1400 recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

Futuremark sintetika

PCMark 8i7-7700K4.864,0i7-6700K4.727,0Ryzen 5 1600X4.495,0Ryzen 7 1800X4.370,0Ryzen 7 1700X4.240,0Ryzen 7 17004.183,0i5-75004.118,0Ryzen 5 1500X4.102,0Ryzen 5 16004.015,0Ryzen 5 14003.766,005.350

PCMark performanse su slabije od očekivanih za 1600 procesor, dok je 1400 dosta slab. Ovaj benchmark ipak voli malo više radne taktove.

3DMark TimespyRyzen 7 1700X7.506,0Ryzen 7 1800X7.493,0Ryzen 7 17007.393,0Ryzen 5 1600X7.307,0Ryzen 5 16007.205,0Ryzen 5 1500X6.727,0i5-75006.583,0Ryzen 5 14006.517,008.257 3DMark FirestrikeRyzen 5 1600X17.722,0Ryzen 7 1800X16.948,0Ryzen 7 1700X16.820,0Ryzen 5 1500X16.408,0i5-750015.697,0Ryzen 7 170015.564,0Ryzen 5 140014.979,0019.494

1400 podbacuje i u grafičkim testovima, jednostavno nema snage izvući maksimum iz GTX1080. U Firestrikeu nemamo rezultat za 1600 jer je pri svakom izvođenju benchmarka dolazilo do greške.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPi7-6950X50.375,0Ryzen 7 1800X41.197,0i7-5960X40.065,0Ryzen 7 1700X39.010,0Ryzen 7 170036.906,0i7-4960X35.921,0i7-3960X34.371,0i7-5930K32.228,0Ryzen 5 1600X32.093,0i7-5820K31.261,0Ryzen 5 160031.200,0i7-980X29.058,0i7-3930K28.938,0i7-7700K28.583,0i7-6700K26.328,0i7-4790K26.327,0i7-3770K24.437,0i7-4770K23.564,0Ryzen 5 1500X22.909,0FX-815020.957,0i7-2600K20.101,0Ryzen 5 140020.016,0i5-4690K18.528,0i5-6600K18.155,0i5-4670K17.203,0i5-750016.598,0i5-2500K14.254,0055.413

1600 sasvim očekivano ima mali zaostatak za 1600X, dok je 1400 ipak nešto više sporiji od 1500X. 1600 je nadmašio čuveni 980X koji također ima 6C/12T konfigiraciju.

Cinebench 15i7-6950X1.864,0Ryzen 7 1800X1.624,0Ryzen 7 1700X1.542,0Ryzen 7 17001.403,0i7-5960X1.377,0Ryzen 5 1600X1.241,0Ryzen 5 16001.129,0i7-5930K1.101,0i7-5820K1.074,0i7-7700K989,0i7-6700K935,0Ryzen 5 1500X814,0Ryzen 5 1400703,0i5-6600K651,0i5-7500596,002.050

OPnovno slična situacija kao i u ranijem testu.

HandbrakeRyzen 7 1800X25,6Ryzen 7 1700X24,6Ryzen 7 170022,3Ryzen 5 1600X19,5Ryzen 5 160017,5i7-5820K17,2i7-7700K17,1i7-6700K15,9Ryzen 5 1500X13,1Ryzen 5 140011,6i5-750011,3028

Zanimljivo je kako 1400 s 4C/8T konfiguracijom ne uspijeva biti puno brži od 4C i5-7500 procesora, dok je 1600 malo brži od i7-5820K procesora 6C/12T konfiguracije.

TrueCrypt v7.1i7-6950X10,5Ryzen 7 1800X10,0Ryzen 7 1700X9,4Ryzen 7 17008,6i7-5960X8,4Ryzen 5 1600X7,3Ryzen 5 16006,7i7-5930K6,6i7-5820K6,3i7-4960X6,0i7-7700K5,6i7-3960X5,5i7-6700K5,2i7-4790K5,2Ryzen 5 1500X4,8i7-4770K4,5Ryzen 5 14004,3i5-6600K3,4i5-4670K3,3FX-81503,3i5-4690K3,3i5-75003,2i7-3770K3,2i5-2500K2,8012

AES performanse su očekivano solidne kod oba procesora.

wPrime 2.0i7-6950X86,9Ryzen 7 1800X103,9Ryzen 7 1700X108,3i7-5960X116,9Ryzen 7 1700121,4i7-4960X129,6i7-3960X135,1i7-5930K136,3Ryzen 5 1600X138,7i7-5820K140,2Ryzen 5 1600149,9i7-3930K164,6i7-7700K167,4i7-6700K178,3i7-4790K186,5i7-4770K195,2i7-3770K198,1Ryzen 5 1500X213,5i7-2600K225,0Ryzen 5 1400237,5FX-8150276,0i5-6600K277,7i5-4670K285,4i5-7500301,0i5-2500K321,60354

Istu stvar kao i u prethodnim benchmarcima gledamo i ovdje.

x.264 Benchmark v5.0i7-6950X128,2Ryzen 7 1800X104,4Ryzen 7 1700X99,7i7-5930K92,3i7-5960X91,9Ryzen 7 170090,2i7-5820K89,8Ryzen 5 1600X88,1i7-6700K78,2Ryzen 5 160074,7i7-4770R72,2i5-4670K62,6Ryzen 5 1500X61,8Ryzen 5 140054,6i5-6600K53,4i5-750049,50141

Za kraj opet slična situacija kao i ranije, 1400 očekivano nešto zaostaje za 1500X, a 1600 za 1600X, uz činjenicu da je 4C/8T i7-6700K ovdje nešto brži od 1600.