OGLAS

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 & 1400 recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

Futuremark sintetika

PCMark 8i7-7700K: 4.864i7-7700K4.864i7-6700K: 4.727i7-6700K4.727Ryzen 5 1600X: 4.495Ryzen 5 1600X4.495Ryzen 7 1800X: 4.370Ryzen 7 1800X4.370Ryzen 7 1700X: 4.240Ryzen 7 1700X4.240Ryzen 7 1700: 4.183Ryzen 7 17004.183i5-7500: 4.118i5-75004.118Ryzen 5 1500X: 4.102Ryzen 5 1500X4.102Ryzen 5 1600: 4.015Ryzen 5 16004.015Ryzen 5 1400: 3.766Ryzen 5 14003.76605.350

PCMark performanse su slabije od očekivanih za 1600 procesor, dok je 1400 dosta slab. Ovaj benchmark ipak voli malo više radne taktove.

3DMark TimespyRyzen 7 1700X: 7.506Ryzen 7 1700X7.506Ryzen 7 1800X: 7.493Ryzen 7 1800X7.493Ryzen 7 1700: 7.393Ryzen 7 17007.393Ryzen 5 1600X: 7.307Ryzen 5 1600X7.307Ryzen 5 1600: 7.205Ryzen 5 16007.205Ryzen 5 1500X: 6.727Ryzen 5 1500X6.727i5-7500: 6.583i5-75006.583Ryzen 5 1400: 6.517Ryzen 5 14006.51708.257
3DMark FirestrikeRyzen 5 1600X: 17.722Ryzen 5 1600X17.722Ryzen 7 1800X: 16.948Ryzen 7 1800X16.948Ryzen 7 1700X: 16.820Ryzen 7 1700X16.820Ryzen 5 1500X: 16.408Ryzen 5 1500X16.408i5-7500: 15.697i5-750015.697Ryzen 7 1700: 15.564Ryzen 7 170015.564Ryzen 5 1400: 14.979Ryzen 5 140014.979019.494

1400 podbacuje i u grafičkim testovima, jednostavno nema snage izvući maksimum iz GTX1080. U Firestrikeu nemamo rezultat za 1600 jer je pri svakom izvođenju benchmarka dolazilo do greške.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPi7-6950X: 50.375i7-6950X50.375Ryzen 7 1800X: 41.197Ryzen 7 1800X41.197i7-5960X: 40.065i7-5960X40.065Ryzen 7 1700X: 39.010Ryzen 7 1700X39.010Ryzen 7 1700: 36.906Ryzen 7 170036.906i7-4960X: 35.921i7-4960X35.921i7-3960X: 34.371i7-3960X34.371i7-5930K: 32.228i7-5930K32.228Ryzen 5 1600X: 32.093Ryzen 5 1600X32.093i7-5820K: 31.261i7-5820K31.261Ryzen 5 1600: 31.200Ryzen 5 160031.200i7-980X: 29.058i7-980X29.058i7-3930K: 28.938i7-3930K28.938i7-7700K: 28.583i7-7700K28.583i7-6700K: 26.328i7-6700K26.328i7-4790K: 26.327i7-4790K26.327i7-3770K: 24.437i7-3770K24.437i7-4770K: 23.564i7-4770K23.564Ryzen 5 1500X: 22.909Ryzen 5 1500X22.909FX-8150: 20.957FX-815020.957i7-2600K: 20.101i7-2600K20.101Ryzen 5 1400: 20.016Ryzen 5 140020.016i5-4690K: 18.528i5-4690K18.528i5-6600K: 18.155i5-6600K18.155i5-4670K: 17.203i5-4670K17.203i5-7500: 16.598i5-750016.598i5-2500K: 14.254i5-2500K14.254055.413

1600 sasvim očekivano ima mali zaostatak za 1600X, dok je 1400 ipak nešto više sporiji od 1500X. 1600 je nadmašio čuveni 980X koji također ima 6C/12T konfigiraciju.

Cinebench 15i7-6950X: 1.864i7-6950X1.864Ryzen 7 1800X: 1.624Ryzen 7 1800X1.624Ryzen 7 1700X: 1.542Ryzen 7 1700X1.542Ryzen 7 1700: 1.403Ryzen 7 17001.403i7-5960X: 1.377i7-5960X1.377Ryzen 5 1600X: 1.241Ryzen 5 1600X1.241Ryzen 5 1600: 1.129Ryzen 5 16001.129i7-5930K: 1.101i7-5930K1.101i7-5820K: 1.074i7-5820K1.074i7-7700K: 989i7-7700K989i7-6700K: 935i7-6700K935Ryzen 5 1500X: 814Ryzen 5 1500X814Ryzen 5 1400: 703Ryzen 5 1400703i5-6600K: 651i5-6600K651i5-7500: 596i5-750059602.050

OPnovno slična situacija kao i u ranijem testu.

HandbrakeRyzen 7 1800X: 25,6Ryzen 7 1800X25,6Ryzen 7 1700X: 24,6Ryzen 7 1700X24,6Ryzen 7 1700: 22,3Ryzen 7 170022,3Ryzen 5 1600X: 19,5Ryzen 5 1600X19,5Ryzen 5 1600: 17,5Ryzen 5 160017,5i7-5820K: 17,2i7-5820K17,2i7-7700K: 17,1i7-7700K17,1i7-6700K: 15,9i7-6700K15,9Ryzen 5 1500X: 13,1Ryzen 5 1500X13,1Ryzen 5 1400: 11,6Ryzen 5 140011,6i5-7500: 11,31i5-750011,31028

Zanimljivo je kako 1400 s 4C/8T konfiguracijom ne uspijeva biti puno brži od 4C i5-7500 procesora, dok je 1600 malo brži od i7-5820K procesora 6C/12T konfiguracije.

TrueCrypt v7.1i7-6950X: 10,5i7-6950X10,5Ryzen 7 1800X: 10,0Ryzen 7 1800X10,0Ryzen 7 1700X: 9,4Ryzen 7 1700X9,4Ryzen 7 1700: 8,6Ryzen 7 17008,6i7-5960X: 8,4i7-5960X8,4Ryzen 5 1600X: 7,3Ryzen 5 1600X7,3Ryzen 5 1600: 6,7Ryzen 5 16006,7i7-5930K: 6,6i7-5930K6,6i7-5820K: 6,3i7-5820K6,3i7-4960X: 6i7-4960X6i7-7700K: 5,6i7-7700K5,6i7-3960X: 5,5i7-3960X5,5i7-6700K: 5,2i7-6700K5,2i7-4790K: 5,2i7-4790K5,2Ryzen 5 1500X: 4,8Ryzen 5 1500X4,8i7-4770K: 4,5i7-4770K4,5Ryzen 5 1400: 4,3Ryzen 5 14004,3i5-6600K: 3,4i5-6600K3,4i5-4670K: 3,3i5-4670K3,3FX-8150: 3,3FX-81503,3i5-4690K: 3,3i5-4690K3,3i5-7500: 3,2i5-75003,2i7-3770K: 3,2i7-3770K3,2i5-2500K: 2,8i5-2500K2,8012

AES performanse su očekivano solidne kod oba procesora.

wPrime 2.0i7-6950X: 86,854i7-6950X86,854Ryzen 7 1800X: 103,919Ryzen 7 1800X103,919Ryzen 7 1700X: 108,265Ryzen 7 1700X108,265i7-5960X: 116,929i7-5960X116,929Ryzen 7 1700: 121,355Ryzen 7 1700121,355i7-4960X: 129,637i7-4960X129,637i7-3960X: 135,127i7-3960X135,127i7-5930K: 136,293i7-5930K136,293Ryzen 5 1600X: 138,705Ryzen 5 1600X138,705i7-5820K: 140,245i7-5820K140,245Ryzen 5 1600: 149,89Ryzen 5 1600149,89i7-3930K: 164,566i7-3930K164,566i7-7700K: 167,364i7-7700K167,364i7-6700K: 178,347i7-6700K178,347i7-4790K: 186,468i7-4790K186,468i7-4770K: 195,174i7-4770K195,174i7-3770K: 198,092i7-3770K198,092Ryzen 5 1500X: 213,481Ryzen 5 1500X213,481i7-2600K: 225i7-2600K225Ryzen 5 1400: 237,491Ryzen 5 1400237,491FX-8150: 275,996FX-8150275,996i5-6600K: 277,733i5-6600K277,733i5-4670K: 285,449i5-4670K285,449i5-7500: 301,003i5-7500301,003i5-2500K: 321,608i5-2500K321,6080354

Istu stvar kao i u prethodnim benchmarcima gledamo i ovdje.

x.264 Benchmark v5.0i7-6950X: 128,21i7-6950X128,21Ryzen 7 1800X: 104,4Ryzen 7 1800X104,4Ryzen 7 1700X: 99,67Ryzen 7 1700X99,67i7-5930K: 92,30i7-5930K92,30i7-5960X: 91,94i7-5960X91,94Ryzen 7 1700: 90,24Ryzen 7 170090,24i7-5820K: 89,84i7-5820K89,84Ryzen 5 1600X: 88,05Ryzen 5 1600X88,05i7-6700K: 78,18i7-6700K78,18Ryzen 5 1600: 74,67Ryzen 5 160074,67i7-4770R: 72,21i7-4770R72,21i5-4670K: 62,63i5-4670K62,63Ryzen 5 1500X: 61,77Ryzen 5 1500X61,77Ryzen 5 1400: 54,62Ryzen 5 140054,62i5-6600K: 53,37i5-6600K53,37i5-7500: 49,48i5-750049,480141

Za kraj opet slična situacija kao i ranije, 1400 očekivano nešto zaostaje za 1500X, a 1600 za 1600X, uz činjenicu da je 4C/8T i7-6700K ovdje nešto brži od 1600.

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

Stranica 3 od 6

OGLAS