AMD Ryzen 5 3400G recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

Futuremark testovi

PCMark 10Ryzen 5 3400G4.570,0Ryzen 5 2400G4.355,0Ryzen 3 2200G4.251,0A10-7680K2.400,005.027

PCMark 10 donosi određeni porast u performansama koji je svakako dobrodošao i pokazatelj je da će računalo opremljeno Ryzenom 5 3400G malo brže obavljati svakodnevne zadatke.

3DMark Time SpyRyzen 5 3400G1.367,0Ryzen 5 2400G1.251,0Ryzen 3 2200G1.000,001.504 3DMark Fire StrikeGigabyte GTX1050 G1 Gaming 2GB OC7.076,0Gigabyte RX560 Gaming 2GB OC6.289,0Ryzen 5 3400G3.639,0Ryzen 5 2400G3.203,0Ryzen 3 2200G2.700,0A10-7680K1.892,007.784

U Time Spy DX12 testu je novi 3400G brži za oko 9.2%, a u Fire Strike DX11 testu za nešto boljih 13.6%. Naravno, još integrirana grafika nije ni blizu diskretnim desktop karticama kao što je RX560.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPRyzen 5 1600X32.093,0i7-5820K31.261,0Ryzen 5 160031.200,0i7-980X29.058,0i7-3930K28.938,0i7-7700K28.583,0i5-8600K28.294,0i7-6700K26.328,0i7-4790K26.327,0i7-3770K24.437,0Ryzen 5 3400G23.817,0i7-4770K23.564,0Ryzen 5 1500X22.909,0Ryzen 5 2400G21.251,0FX-815020.957,0i7-2600K20.101,0Ryzen 5 140020.016,0i5-4690K18.528,0i5-6600K18.155,0i5-4670K17.203,0i5-750016.598,0Ryzen 3 1300X14.896,0Ryzen 3 2200G14.871,0i5-2500K14.254,0Ryzen 3 120012.560,0035.302

I testu kompresije je 3400G brži za okruglih 12% od 2400G.

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Threadripper 1950X161,3Threadripper 1920X197,1i7-8700K283,4i7-7800X355,1i5-8600K406,6Ryzen 5 3400G549,8Ryzen 5 2400G571,9Ryzen 3 2200G874,20962

U Blenderu je razlika nešto nižih 3.9%.

Cinebench 15 Multi CoreRyzen 5 1600X1.241,0Ryzen 5 16001.129,0i7-5930K1.101,0i7-5820K1.074,0i5-8600K1.030,0i7-7700K989,0i7-6700K935,0Ryzen 5 3400G874,0Ryzen 5 2400G829,0Ryzen 5 1500X814,0Ryzen 5 1400703,0i5-6600K651,0i3-8100604,0i5-7500596,0Ryzen 3 2200G567,0Ryzen 3 1300X558,0Ryzen 3 1200482,0i3-7350K445,001.365 Cinebench 20 Multi CoreRyzen 5 3400G1.956,0Ryzen 5 2400G1.835,002.152 Cinebench 20 Single CoreRyzen 5 3400G386,0Ryzen 5 2400G356,00425

Cinebench multi core testovi daju prednost novom procesoru od 5.4% i 6.6%, a u single core je najveći dobitak od 8.4%.

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 5 3600X144,0Ryzen 5 3400G256,0Ryzen 5 2400G276,00304

Ovdje je 3400G za 7.2% brži od 2400G.

TrueCrypt v7.1Ryzen 5 1600X7,3Ryzen 5 16006,7i7-5930K6,6i7-5820K6,3i7-4960X6,0i7-7700K5,6i5-8600K5,5i7-3960X5,4i7-6700K5,2i7-4790K5,2Ryzen 5 3400G5,2Ryzen 5 1500X4,8i7-4770K4,5Ryzen 5 14004,3Ryzen 5 2400G4,2i5-6600K3,4i5-4670K3,3FX-81503,3i5-4690K3,3i5-75003,2i7-3770K3,2Ryzen 3 1300X3,1i5-2500K2,8Ryzen 3 2200G2,6Ryzen 3 12002,108

Ovdje je razlika između 3400G i 2400G najveća, čak 23.8% u korist novijeg procesora.

V-Ray Benchmark 1.0.8 (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 5 3600X93,0Ryzen 5 3400G154,0Ryzen 5 2400G165,00182

U V-Rayu je 3400G za 6.6% brži od starijeg 2400G.

wPrime 2.0Ryzen 5 1600X138,7i7-5820K140,2Ryzen 5 1600149,9i7-3930K164,6i5-8600K167,4i7-7700K175,4i7-6700K178,3i7-4790K186,5Ryzen 5 3400G194,4i7-4770K195,2i7-3770K198,1Ryzen 5 2400G203,4Ryzen 5 1500X213,5i7-2600K225,0Ryzen 5 1400237,5FX-8150276,0i5-6600K277,7i5-4670K285,4i5-7500301,0i5-2500K321,6Ryzen 3 2200G329,3Ryzen 3 1300X334,0Ryzen 3 1200389,50428

wPrime donosi malu razliku za novi procesor, prednost od samo 4.4%.