ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780 Ti & GTX780 Ti DirectCU II OC – SLI testovi

· · Video · Stranica 4 od 7

Rezultati testova – prvi dio

3DMark FirestrikeAMD Radeon R9 290 @ CFX15.623,0ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II @ SLI15.508,02x Nvidia GTX780 @ SLI13.433,0AMD HD799011.734,0MSI GTX770 TwinFrozr @ SLI10.923,0ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti10.760,0ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II10.584,0AMD Radeon R9 290X9.931,0Nvidia GTX780 Ti9.923,0Gainward GTX6909.768,02x AMD R9 270X9.731,0Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X9.584,0AMD Radeon R9 2909.303,02x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX9.065,0ASUS MARS 7608.974,0ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC8.640,0MSI R9 280X7.669,0017.185

Kao i uvijek otvaramo 3DMarkom koji pokazuje kako su dvije overclockirane Ti kartice vrlo brze, ali i kako CFX nešto malo bolje skalira od SLI-a.

Battlefield 4 (1920 @ 1200 @ Ultra)ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II @ SLI159,3AMD Radeon R9 290 @ CFX104,2ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti94,9ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II92,3ASUS MARS 76089,3Nvidia GTX780 Ti80,0Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X74,2Nvidia GTX78072,52x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX70,6AMD Radeon R9 29066,30175 Battlefield 4 (2540 @ 1440 @ Ultra)ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II @ SLI119,3AMD Radeon R9 290 @ CFX79,6ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti69,4Nvidia GTX780 Ti68,5ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II68,4ASUS MARS 76066,7Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X56,42x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX49,9AMD Radeon R9 29049,7Nvidia GTX78049,00131

BF4 lijepo skalira sa SLI konfiguracijom, a vidimo i kako su Ti kartice jako brze. Ovdje, u pravom svijetu, SLI znatno bolje skalira od CFX-a.

Bioshock Infinite (2540 @ 1440 @ Ultra)ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II @ SLI155,2AMD Radeon R9 290 @ CFX141,0ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti105,2ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II103,7ASUS MARS 76097,9Nvidia GTX780 Ti89,3AMD Radeon R9 290X85,82x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX85,5Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X83,5AMD Radeon R9 29080,6Nvidia GTX78076,50171 Bioshock Infinite (2540 @ 1440 @ Ultra w. DDOF)ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II @ SLI129,2AMD Radeon R9 290 @ CFX108,6ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti83,1ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II82,4ASUS MARS 76078,8Nvidia GTX780 Ti71,72x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX63,4AMD Radeon R9 290X60,0Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X59,7Nvidia GTX78059,2AMD Radeon R9 29058,30142

I ovdje primjećujemo kako SLI odlično skalira, ali je CFX ipak bolji, gledajući relativan pomak u performansama. Obje su kartice vrlo brze i kao i u prethodnom testu, brže od MARS-ice. R9 290X je ovdje daleko zaostala.

Crysis 3 (2540 @ 1440 @ VH, FXAA, AF16x)ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II @ SLI86,9AMD Radeon R9 290 @ CFX61,9ASUS MARS 76050,1ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti47,6ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II46,1AMD Radeon R9 290X42,9Nvidia GTX780 Ti42,82x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX40,7Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X40,5AMD Radeon R9 29039,6Nvidia GTX78036,6096

Crysis 3 ponovno bolje skalira sa SLI setupom nego sa CFX pa su performanse izvrsne. Ovdje je R9 290X ipak nešto bliže po  performansama, a prilikom analize performansi ipak treba uzeti u obzir koliko je ona jeftinija od GTX780 Ti.