ASUS NUC 14 Pro recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Računala · Stranica 2 od 3

Rezultati testova

Sintetika

PCMark 10 PCMark 10Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY)12.618,0Razer Blade 14 (2023)8.059,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G147.660,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2023)7.603,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (GU605)7.304,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S177.253,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE7.185,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 177.176,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF7.062,0Asus Zenbook Duo (2024)6.959,0Asus NUC 14 Pro (165H)6.845,0Asus ROG Strix G166.635,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024)6.560,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405 – Performance mode)6.384,0Dell XPS 17 97106.342,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC6.280,0Dell XPS 15 95206.273,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405 – Standard mode)6.260,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC6.032,0Dell G7 77005.795,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED5.623,0Asus Asus TUF Gaming A155.541,0Dell Precision 75305.203,0Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H)5.181,0Dell G5 55905.135,0Asus G531GU5.064,0Dell XPS 15 95005.037,0Asus ZenBook Duo 144.948,0Dell XPS 17 97004.909,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED4.894,0Dell G7 77904.768,0Dell Vostro 35004.605,0Asus UX580GE4.330,0Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H)4.309,0Dell Latitude 55004.306,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H)4.256,0Dell Vostro 35804.167,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H)4.132,0Dell Inspiron 73863.969,0Dell Latitude 95103.963,0Dell XPS 13 93803.889,0Dell Latitude 74903.562,0Dell XPS 13 93652.192,0013.880 Performanse NUC-a ćemo ovdje usporediti s performansama prijenosnika jer je platforma slična. NUC 14 Pro pokazuje sasvim solidne općenite performanse koje su usporedive s modernim gamerskim prijenosnicima. 3DMark Time Spy 3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 409020.355,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 409014.061,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 407012.490,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX407011.651,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 407010.818,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 406010.815,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 308010.240,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S8.861,0Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40608.068,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.867,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX40507.765,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.242,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ6.975,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ6.855,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti4.793,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Intel Arc3.648,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus NUC 14 Pro (Intel Arc – 165H)3.592,0Asus Zenbook Duo (2024) – Intel Arc3.201,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe1.835,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – Iris Xe1.527,0022.391 3DMark Port Royal 3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 409013.080,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 409010.108,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 40707.165,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX40707.063,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 40706.725,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 30806.698,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 30806.328,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 40605.882,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M5.515,0Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.700,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX 40504.167,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.017,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX6800S3.923,0Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40603.819,0Asus NUC 14 Pro (Intel Arc – 165H)1.436,0014.388 3DMark Speed Way 3DMark Speed WayAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 40905.358,0Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC5.156,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 40904.072,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 40702.903,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 40702.723,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX 40501.795,0Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40601.626,0Asus NUC 14 Pro (Intel Arc – 165H)403,005.894 Grafičke performanse su solidne za jednu integriranu grafiku. Vidimo kako je u TimeSpyu brza kao primjerice prijenosnik s GTX 1650 karticom. Sasvim solidno za odigrati pokoji stariji i manje zahtjevan naslov. 3DMark CPU 3DMark CPU ProfileCore i7-14700K14.381,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 -i9-14900HX11.650,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX9.033,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H7.684,0Asus NUC 14 Pro – Core Ultra 7 165H7.585,0Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H7.574,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H7.356,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS7.291,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H7.131,0Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H5.495,0015.819 Performanse procesora su solidne, no kao što vidimo malo prigušene jer su vrlo slične Ultra 7 155H procesoru u Swift X 14 prijenosniku. Procyon AI Computer Vision IntelOpenVINOCore Ultra 7 165H NPU272,0Core Ultra 7 165H CPU73,00299 Vidljivo je veliko ubrzanje kod izvršavanja ovoga testa s NPU-om, u odnosu na CPU.

CPU Performanse

Cinebench 23 Cinebench 23 Multicore CPURyzen 9 7950X37.776,0Core i7-14700K35.503,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX32.274,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX28.895,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX20.427,0Asus NUC 14 Pro – Core Ultra 7 165H17.144,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H17.087,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H15.962,0Ryzen 5 7600X15.409,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS15.115,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)13.846,0Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H13.714,0Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H12.986,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H12.253,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)8.143,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U5.808,0041.554 Cinebench 23 Single Core CPUAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX2.212,0Core i7-14700K2.187,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H1.901,0Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H1.806,0Asus NUC 14 Pro – Core Ultra 7 165H1.793,0Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H1.736,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)1.704,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H1.691,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Deafult Standard mode)1.668,002.433 U Cinebenchu 13620H procesor malo zaostaje za Core Ultra 7 155H što je i logično ako pogledamo maksimalni broj threadova – 22 vs. 16. Blender Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K68,2Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX77,7Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX95,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX122,1Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H133,1Asus NUC 14 Pro – Core Ultra 7 165H145,1Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H154,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS167,2Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H170,2Ryzen 9 5900HX176,7Core i9-11900H181,7Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17182,2AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus ROG Zephyrus G14185,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)199,6Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H212,8Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H217,1Ryzen 7 4800H228,0Ryzen 7 3700X233,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK237,3Core i7 10750H258,1Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7 10870H275,7i5-10600K301,7Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)377,1Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U451,30496 Blender Gooseberry Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K317,8Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX474,3Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H713,5Asus NUC 14 Pro – Core Ultra 7 165H760,4Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX901,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H946,9Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H949,9Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS1.158,1Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)1.195,5Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H1.450,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)1.559,501.715 U prvom testu 13620H malo zaostaje za 7 155H, no u drugom su zato izjednačeni. Naravno, kada su prijenosnici u pitanju teško je direktno uspoređivati procesore jer su šasije a i hlađenje drugačije. Handbrake Handbrake (FPS)Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX88,8Core i7-14700K79,5Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H69,4Asus NUC 14 Pro – Core Ultra 7 165H65,3Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H58,2Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H50,9Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)48,7Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H46,2098 Core Ultra 7 165H pokazuje sasvim solidne performanse i pokazuje da je riječ o ozbiljnom procesoru koji može odraditi i teže zadatke s lakoćom.

SSD performanse

Čitanje ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 1612.400,0SKHynix P41 2TB6.640,0Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift X 146.620,0Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB6.533,0Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB6.500,0Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 146.210,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB6.120,0Samsung PM9A1 512GB – NUC 14 Pro6.030,0Micron 3400 1TB – Zenbook S 13 OLED5.930,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.950,0Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G164.600,0WDC PC SN560 1TB – Zenbook 14 OLED4.380,0Micron 2450 1TB3.440,0Toshiba 1TB3.340,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.200,0WDC SN730 1TB2.970,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920,0Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730,0Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35002.210,0Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,2SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,6Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,7ST1000LM035120,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,4102,0013.640 Zapis ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 169.720,0SKHynix P41 2TB5.940,0Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB5.221,0Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift X 144.820,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB4.770,0Samsung PM9A1 512GB4.640,0Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB4.620,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.610,0Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 144.600,0Samsung PM9A1 512GB – NUC 14 Pro4.450,0Micron 2450 1TB3.950,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.380,0Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G163.210,0WDC SN730 1TB3.080,0WDC PC SN560 1TB – Zenbook 14 OLED2.830,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.810,0Toshiba 1TB2.460,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.350,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.280,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.210,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G71.690,0Kioxia XG6 1TB1.600,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.480,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.460,0WDC PC SN520 @ G31.370,0WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.340,0Kioxia BG4 512GB1.330,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35001.310,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.210,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.080,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F932,7Toshiba BG3 256GB690,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB636,1Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G540,0SK Hynix SC311 256GB349,5Toshiba BG3 512GB344,0Toshiba MQ04ABF100102,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G396,6ST1000LM03585,9010.692 Solidne performanse za Samsungov PM9A1, ali vidimo da je 512 GB verzija ipak sporija od 1 i 2 TB varijanti.

Memorijske performanse 

AIDA Memory AIDA Memory – ReadAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-750085.641,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560084.544,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-750084.173,0Asus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-750082.439,0ASUS NUC 14 Pro – 16GB DDR5-560073.814,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480067.783,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480067.240,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-480064.865,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80063.180,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560061.175,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480059.126,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.666,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20047.154,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR546.644,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.936,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.504,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00041.081,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.979,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.898,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99338.500,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.827,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.721,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293337.280,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266635.413,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.425,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240032.884,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.876,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66729.969,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213329.688,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.488,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.827,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L27.155,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213326.830,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320024.509,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.290,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L23.120,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L21.151,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L19.772,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L18.210,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.787,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.639,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.292,0094.205 AIDA Memory – WriteRazer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560077.484,0Asus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-750076.044,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-750074.750,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-750074.709,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR574.078,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80071.123,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560066.366,0ASUS NUC 14 Pro – 16GB DDR5-560064.615,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480060.204,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-480060.053,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480059.499,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480057.583,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480055.150,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.592,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00044.859,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293344.706,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.098,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93340.291,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99339.635,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93339.627,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.798,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266637.621,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.124,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240034.834,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.035,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66733.310,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.951,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213331.835,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L31.531,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20031.460,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213331.017,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213328.479,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L26.818,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L24.970,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.893,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320023.107,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L19.776,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.929,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.815,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L17.759,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.439,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L14.544,0085.232 AIDA Memory – copyAsus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-750093.482,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-750092.463,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-750088.667,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560077.918,0ASUS NUC 14 Pro – 16GB DDR5-560065.424,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80064.509,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560061.611,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480060.167,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR559.159,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-480058.908,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480058.746,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.082,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480048.811,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20041.091,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00040.090,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20040.025,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293338.128,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20036.926,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93335.188,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93334.508,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99333.186,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266632.709,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66732.163,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.871,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.333,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240030.654,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.712,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99329.405,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213328.446,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66727.379,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.082,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L26.430,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213325.618,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.606,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.296,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320022.232,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L20.839,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L19.047,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.016,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.863,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.798,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.220,00102.830 Memorijske performanse su sasvim solidne za DDR5-5600 specifikaciju.

Zagrijavanje i buka

asus_nuc_14_pro_10

Procesor hladi maleni bakreni hladnjak s ventilatorom koji se poprilično čuje te smo na maksimumu izmjerili 45,4 dB(A) na udaljenosti od oko 30 centimetara. Procesor se inicijalno zagrijava do 101°C nakon čega padaju taktovi i temperatura na prosječnih 80-tak °C. Ostali senzori pokazuju oko 105°C za CPU VRM, 70°C za senzor na matičnoj ploči, 55,25°C za memoriju, 48°C za SSD itd. Maleno računalo je sasvim solidnih performansi, ali mora se računati na povišeno zagrijavanje i dosta čujni rad ventilatora. Ukupna potrošnja sistema se kreće oko 93 W, pri čemu se AC/DC adapter dosta zagrijava, te smo izmjerili vanjsku temperaturu od 58°C infracrvenim termometrom.

POVEZANI ČLANCI