Rezultati testova – drugi dio
Metro Last Light
|
 |
| 1920×1200 (VH, AF16X) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 83,67 |
 |
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 72,33 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 69,33 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 69 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 64 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 61 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 58 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 55,33 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 54,33 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 41 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 40,67 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 40 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 38 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 37,33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (VH, AF16X) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 59,67 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 50,33 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 49 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 46,67 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 46,33 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 42,67 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 41 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 29 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 26,52 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 26,33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Toxic je definitivno vrlo brz i skoro pa opravdava svoju povšenu potrošnju. Asus je ponovno malo ispred MSI-a.
Sleeping Dogs
|
|
| 1920×1200 @ Extreme |
| AMD HD7990 |
| 80,5 |
|
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 71,5 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 67,3 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 66,8 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 65,3 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 61,7 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 57,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 56,1 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 54 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 51,1 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 49,4 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 48,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 48 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 47,8 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 41,1 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX670 DCU Mini |
| 36,8 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 36,1 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 35,4 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 33,1 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 31,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 31,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 @ Extreme |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 43,7 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 42,2 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 41,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 35 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 34,5 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 33,3 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 22,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 20,2 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 19,9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Ponovno ista situacija kao i do sada, a i ovdje vidimo kako na višoj rezoluciji Asusica uspijeva držati korak sa GTX780.
Tomb Raider
|
|
| 1920×1200 (Ultimate) |
| AMD HD7990 |
| 101 |
|
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 87,9 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 83 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 80,2 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 79,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 75,1 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 70,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 69,5 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 66 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 62 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 60,4 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 59,6 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 57,7 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 56,7 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 49,5 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX670 DCU Mini |
| 45,4 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 44,4 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 43,8 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 41,8 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 40,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 40,3 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 39,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (Ultimate) |
| Nvidia GTX780 Ti |
| 56,9 |
|
|
|
| 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX |
| 54,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 53,5 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 51,2 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 47,8 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 45,9 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 44,5 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X |
| 31,2 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte R9 270 OC |
| 27,7 |
|
|
|
| PowerColor R9 270 OC |
| 27,6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Sve rečeno za prethodni test vrijedi i za ovaj. Asusova kartica je brža od MSI-eve pa će zanimljivo biti usporediti potrošnju, zagrijavanje, buku i na kraju cijenu.
Overclocking
|
|
| Bioshock Infinite (1920×1200) |
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ OC |
| 86,46 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 81,14 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II @ OC |
| 76,78 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 72,32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Hitman Absolution (1920×1200) |
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ OC |
| 62,67 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II @ OC |
| 59,86 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 58,82 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 56,26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Metro LL (1920×1200) |
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ OC |
| 60,67 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II @ OC |
| 58,37 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 58 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 55,33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Sleeping Dogs (1920×1200) |
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic @ OC |
| 57,4 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II @ OC |
| 54,31 |
|
|
|
| Sapphire R9 280X Toxic |
| 54 |
|
|
|
| Asus R9 280X DCU II |
| 51,1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Asusica sa solidnim OC potencijalom uspjeva i prestići Toxic model na njenim tvorničkim taktovima.
