Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 (G733PY) recenzija

· Denis Arunović · Mobilno · Stranica 4 od 5

Rezultati testova

PCMark 10

PCMark 10Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY)12.618,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G147.660,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S177.253,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE7.185,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 177.176,0Dell XPS 17 97106.342,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC6.280,0Dell XPS 15 95206.273,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC6.032,0Dell G7 77005.795,0Asus TUF Gaming A155.541,0Dell Precision 75305.203,0Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H)5.181,0Dell G5 55905.135,0Asus G531GU5.064,0Dell XPS 15 95005.037,0Asus ZenBook Duo 144.948,0Dell XPS 17 97004.909,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED4.894,0Dell G7 77904.768,0Dell Vostro 35004.605,0Asus UX580GE4.330,0Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H)4.309,0Dell Latitude 55004.306,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H)4.256,0Dell Vostro 35804.167,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H)4.132,0Dell Inspiron 73863.969,0Dell Latitude 95103.963,0Dell XPS 13 93803.889,0Dell Latitude 74903.562,0Dell XPS 13 93652.192,0013.880

Sukladno očekivanjima, Asusova 17-inčna zvjerka papa PCMark 10 za doručak, s 65% višim performansama od dosadašnjeg najbržeg laptopa kojeg smo testirali, a koji je bio temeljen na 8-jezgrenom Ryzenu 7 6. generacije.

3DMark Time Spy

3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 409020.355,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 308010.240,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S8.861,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ8.068,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.867,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ7.242,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ6.975,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti4.793,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe1.835,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0022.391

Time Spy – defacto osnovni test kojim se danas mjere performanse u 3DMarku. Scar je na vrhu liste i to s nedostižnim vodstvom od 77% u odnosu na ranije testirani 17-inčni laptop opremljen s RTX-icom 3080. Vodstvo nad starijim SCAR-om koji je također opremljen s RTX-icom 3080 je još veće.

3DMark Port Royal

3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 409013.080,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 30806.698,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 30806.328,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M5.515,0Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.700,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.017,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX6800S3.923,0014.388

Port Royal u cijelu priču ubacuje i ray tracing što još više odgovara novoj Asusovoj mrcini odnosno arhitekturi RTX-ice 4090. Boost u odnosu na RTX 3080 je gotovo 100% – impresivno.

3DMark Speed Way

3DMark Speed WayAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 40905.358,0Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC5.156,005.894

Speed Way test koristi novu tehniku Mesh Shadera koja dolazi u DirectX 12 Ultimate setu, tj. koristi mesh shadere za optimizaciju LOD-a (Level of Detail) za svaki skup u mreži. Ovdje vidimo da je mobilna RTX 4090 usporediva s desktop RTX 4070 Ti – impresivno.

Igre

Borderlands

Borderlands 3 (Badass, DX12, 1920 x 1080)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17173,0Nvidia RTX 3080 @ SCAR 1790,0AMD Radeon RX 6800S – Zephyrus G1484,0Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G1575,60190 Borderlands 3 (Badass, DX12, 2560 x 1440)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17125,00138

Dirt 5

Dirt 5 (Ultra High, 1080p)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17178,00196 Dirt 5 (Ultra High, 1440p)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17125,00138

Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 1920 x 1080)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17176,0Nvidia RTX 3080 @ SCAR 1797,0Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G1593,0AMD Radeon RX 6800S @ Zephyrus G1492,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aorus 15G KC76,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aero 15 KC73,0RTX 2070 Super63,0GTX1650 Ti31,00194 Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 2560 x 1600)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17157,00173

The Riftbreaker

The Riftbreaker (1920 x 1080)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17357,0AMD Radeon RX 6800S @ Zephyrus G14274,0Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G15234,2Nvidia RTX 3080 @ SCAR 17195,90393 The Riftbreaker (2560 x 1440)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17241,00265

Performanse u igrama su očekivano vrhunske čemu doprinosi i optimalan izbor razlučivosti ekrana. Iako RTX 4090 bez sumnje ima snage nositi se i s 4K razlučivosti, odabir skromnije QHD razlučivosti jamči vrlo visok framerate i bolje iskorištavanje brzine panela od 240 Hz.

CPU Performanse

Cinebench R20

Cinebench 20 Multicore CPUAsus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX12.469,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – Core i9-11900H5.435,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ryzen 9 5900HX5.379,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – Ryzen 9 5900HX5.256,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK5.187,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS4.800,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – Ryzen 7 4800H3.931,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – i7 10870H3.625,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7 10870H3.424,0Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H3.315,0Dell G7 7790 – i9 9880H3.054,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 10750H2.928,0Asus G531GU – i7 9750H2.648,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – i7 10750H2.634,0Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H2.560,0Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8750H2.550,0Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H2.515,0Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK2.044,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – i7 1165G72.020,0Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H1.766,0Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 8665U1.505,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-1065G71.454,0Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165G71.445,0Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10810U1.439,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 8665U1.347,0Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U1.293,0Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U1.257,0013.716 Cinebench 23 Multicore CPURyzen 9 7950X37.776,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX32.274,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0041.554

Ništa manje nisu impresivne ni performanse procesora. Zapravo, performanse su da se smrzneš – 129% bolje od najbržeg laptopa kojeg smo do sada testirali, opremljenog s procesorom Core i9-11900H. Drugo zapravo nije bilo ni za očekivati s obzirom na ugradnju 16-jezgrene stolne arhitekture.

U novijem Cinebenchu s lakoćom tuče desktop Ryzena 9 7900X, no naravno moćni 7950X je ipak nešto brži.

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzn 9 7945HX77,7Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Ryzen 9 5900HX176,7Core i9-11900H181,7Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17182,2AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus ROG Zephyrus G14185,0Ryzen 7 4800H228,0Ryzen 7 3700X233,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK237,3Core i7 10750H258,1Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7 10870H275,7i5-10600K301,70332

U ovom testu imamo i rezultate pravih stolnih procesora, no tu ne sprječava Ryzen 9 7945HX da ih doslovno podere u ovom testu 3D renderiranja.

Memorijske performanse 

AIDA Memory

AIDA Memory – ReadAsus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80063.180,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480059.126,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.666,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20046.644,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.936,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.504,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00041.081,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.979,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.898,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99338.500,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.827,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.721,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293337.280,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266635.413,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.425,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240032.884,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.876,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66729.969,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213329.688,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.488,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.827,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L27.155,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213326.830,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320024.509,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.290,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L23.120,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L21.151,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L19.772,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L18.210,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.787,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.639,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.292,0069.498 AIDA Memory – WriteAsus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80066.366,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480057.583,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480055.150,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.592,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00044.859,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293344.706,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.098,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93340.291,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99339.635,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93339.627,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.798,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266637.621,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.124,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240034.834,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.035,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66733.310,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.951,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213331.835,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L31.531,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20031.460,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213331.017,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213328.479,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L26.818,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L24.970,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.893,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320023.107,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L19.776,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.929,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.815,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L17.759,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.439,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L14.544,0073.003 AIDA Memory – copyAsus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80064.509,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.082,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480048.811,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20041.091,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00040.090,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20040.025,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293338.128,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20036.926,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93335.188,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93334.508,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99333.186,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266632.709,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66732.163,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.871,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.333,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240030.654,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.712,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99329.405,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213328.446,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66727.379,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.082,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L26.430,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213325.618,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.606,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.296,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320022.232,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L20.839,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L19.047,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.016,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.863,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.798,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.220,0070.960

Sirove performanse memorijskog podsustava nisu baš toliko impresivne. Ok, brojke su pri samom vrhun naših grafikona, no imali smo i laptope koji se tu bolje drže.

SSD performanse

Čitanje

ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 2TB6.030,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.950,0Micron 2450 1TB3.440,0Toshiba 1TB3.340,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.200,0WDC SN730 1TB2.970,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920,0Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730,0Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35002.210,0Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,2SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,6Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,7ST1000LM035120,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,4102,006.633

Zapis

ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 2TB4.770,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.610,0Micron 2450 1TB3.950,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.080,0WDC SN730 1TB2.830,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.810,0Toshiba 1TB2.460,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.350,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.280,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.210,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G71.690,0Kioxia XG6 1TB1.600,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.480,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.460,0WDC PC SN520 @ G31.370,0WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.340,0Kioxia BG4 512GB1.330,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35001.310,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.210,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.080,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F932,7Toshiba BG3 256GB690,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB636,1Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G540,0SK Hynix SC311 256GB349,5Toshiba BG3 512GB344,0Toshiba MQ04ABF100102,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G396,6ST1000LM03585,905.247

Slična je situacija i s performansama 2-terabajtnog SSD-a iako se Asus odlučio za Samsungov model PM9A1 koji je deklariran za brzinu čitanja od 7 GB/s i brzinu pisanja od 5 GB/s. Naravno, to ne znači da performanse nisu odlične i da neće zadovoljiti potrebe bilo kojeg tipa korisnika.

Autonomija

4K@30fps playbackDell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh634,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63Wh435,0Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 90 Wh390,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76 Wh390,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh359,0Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh346,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh345,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh332,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh323,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh318,0Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh312,0Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh274,0Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh272,0G531GU – 67 Wh256,0G3 3590 – 51 Wh255,0G5 5590 – 60 Wh239,0Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh237,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh221,0Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh184,00963

Iako je baterija prilično velik, a Asus deklarira da može izdržati 8 i pol sati reprodukcije Full HD videa, u našem testu reprodukcije 4K videa mi smo izvukli svega 3 sata i 4 minute – dosta skromno. Valja napomenuti da slične rezultate bilježe i naše kolege, pa ne možemo reći da je problem baš u našem primjerku. Korištenje stolne arhitekture procesora jednostavno nosi sa sobom ovakve probleme, pogotovo kad je riječ 16-jezgrenoj zvjerki kombiniranoj s najmoćnijom mobilnom grafičkom karticom.

Baterija podržava brzo punjenje, pa je do polovice kapaciteta moguće dopuniti u roku od 30 minuta. Tu je također i podrška za napajanje putem USB-C punjača, no u tom slučaju nemate na raspolaganju pune performanse laptopa.

POVEZANI ČLANCI