ASUS ROG Zephyrus S17 recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Mobilno · Stranica 2 od 3

Rezultati testova

UL Benchmarks PCMark 10Asus ROG Zephyrus S177.253,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE7.185,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC6.280,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC6.032,0Dell G7 77005.795,0Asus TUF Gaming A155.541,0Dell Precision 75305.203,0Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H)5.181,0Dell G5 55905.135,0Asus G531GU5.064,0Dell XPS 15 95005.037,0Asus ZenBook Duo 144.948,0Dell XPS 17 97004.909,0Dell G7 77904.894,0Dell Vostro 35004.605,0Asus UX580GE4.330,0Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H)4.309,0Dell Latitude 55004.306,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H)4.256,0Dell Vostro 35804.167,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H)4.132,0Dell Inspiron 73863.969,0Dell Latitude 95103.963,0Dell XPS 13 93803.889,0Dell Latitude 74903.562,0Dell XPS 13 93652.192,007.978 S17 pokazuje kako je tek mrvicu bolji od G15 Advanced Edition. Ovo je direktna borba top hardvera AMD vs. Intel+Nvidia od strane istog proizvođača (Asus) i ovaj rezultat najbolje demonstrira koliko je AMD daleko dogurao sa svojom mobilnom platformom. 3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ8.068,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.867,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ7.242,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0011.993 3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 30806.698,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M5.515,0Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.700,007.368 Ponovno bliski rezultat u Time Spyu za dvije najmoćnije mobilne grafičke kartice, no Radeonka je ipak kapitulirala u RayTracing testu – ovdje Nvidia ipak ima prednost od jedne cijele generacije. Igre Borderlands 3 (Badass, DX12, 2560 x 1440)GeForce RTX 3080 @ Zephyrus S1765,5072 Dirt 5 (Ultra High, 2560 x 1440)GeForce RTX 3080 @ Zephyrus S1782,8091 Dirt 5 (Ultra High, RayTracing ON, 2560 x 1440)Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G1587,2096 Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 1920 x 1080)Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080107,0Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G1593,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aorus 15G KC90,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aero 15 KC76,0RTX 2070 Super73,0GTX1650 Ti63,031,00118 Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 2560 x 1440)Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308090,0099 The Riftbreaker (Ultra, RayTracing ON, 2560 x 1440)RTX 3080 @ Quality FSR154,2RTX 3080 @ Ultra Quality FSR114,10170 S obzirom na to da je ovaj ekran više rezolucije nego kod G15 AE nemamo u svim naslovima direktnu usporedbu između RTX 3080 i RX 6800M no u onom jednom u kojem imamo (Horizon Zero Dawn) ipak vidimo nadmoć Nvidijine kartice. U ostalim je testovima RTX 3080 pokazala da je dovoljno brza, a tek bi u Borderlandsu 3 možda trebalo spustiti rezoluciju za još bolji framerate. CPU performanse i usporedba s ostalim mobilnim procesorima Cinebench 20 Multicore CPUAsus ROG Zephyrus S17 – Core i9-11900H5.435,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ryzen 9 5900HX5.379,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – Ryzen 7 4800H3.931,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – i7 10870H3.625,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7 10870H3.424,0Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H3.315,0Dell G7 7790 – i9 9880H3.054,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 10750H2.928,0Asus G531GU – i7 9750H2.648,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – i7 10750H2.634,0Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H2.560,0Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8750H2.550,0Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H2.515,0Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK2.044,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – i7 1165G72.020,0Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H1.766,0Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 8665U1.505,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-1065G71.454,0Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165G71.445,0Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10810U1.439,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 8665U1.347,0Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U1.293,0Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U1.257,005.979 Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Ryzen 9 5900HX176,7Core i9-11900H181,7Ryzen 7 4800H228,0Ryzen 7 3700X233,0Core i7 10750H258,1Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7 10870H275,7i5-10600K301,70332 wPrime 2.0Ryzen 9 3900X56,1Ryzen 7 3700X82,8Core i9-11900H86,0Ryzen 7 2700X86,9Ryzen 9 5900HX91,2Ryzen 7 4800H91,9i5-10600K118,7Core i7 10870H122,3Core i7 10750H131,90145 U Cinebenchu su Core i9-11900H i AMD-ov Ryzen 9 5900HX gotovo pa izjednačeni, s malom prednošću za Intel. U Blenderu je situacija obrnuta, a u wPrimeu ponovno Intel vodi. To nam govori da su oba sličnih performansi i podjednako sposobni za teže zadaće. Ipak, za Intelov je procesor bilo potrebno naprednije hlađenje kako bi moga boostati češće na visokom taktu. SSD performanse Čitanje ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 2TB6.030,0WDC SN730 1TB2.970,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920,0Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730,0Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35002.210,0Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,2SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,6Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,7ST1000LM035120,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,4102,006.633 Zapis ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 2TB4.770,0WDC SN730 1TB2.830,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.350,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.280,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.210,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G71.690,0Kioxia XG6 1TB1.600,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.480,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.460,0WDC PC SN520 @ G31.370,0WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.340,0Kioxia BG4 512GB1.330,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35001.310,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.210,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.080,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F932,7Toshiba BG3 256GB690,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB636,1Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G540,0SK Hynix SC311 256GB349,5Toshiba BG3 512GB344,0Toshiba MQ04ABF100102,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G396,6ST1000LM03585,905.247 Performanse Samsungovog PM9A1 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD-a su izvrsne i tu nemamo što više za dodati. Autonomija 4K@30fps playbackDell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh634,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465,0Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh346,0Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh345,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh332,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh318,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh312,0Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh274,0Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh272,0Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh256,0G531GU – 67 Wh255,0G3 3590 – 51 Wh239,0G5 5590 – 60 Wh237,0Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh221,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh205,0195,00963 Autonomija nije sjajna i tu je G15 Advanced Edition pokazao znatno bolji menadžment energijom. Jasno, razlika je u veličini ekrana i rezoluciji no svejedno, rezultat all AMD laptopa je i dalje impresivan. No, ni skoro 6 sati sa Zephyrusom nije za odbaciti. Zagrijavanje, buka i taktovi

asus_zephyrus_s17_14
 
asus_zephyrus_s17_15

Kao i uvijek, testiramo s maksimalnim performansama rashladnog sustava kako bi utvrdili najbolje performanse koje prijenosnik može dati. Maksimalni boost takt procesora u ovom prijenosniku je oko 4,79 GHz uz maksimalnu temperaturu od 94°C prije nego nastupi spuštanje takta na oko konstantnih 4,6 GHz pod opterećenjem pri čemu se temperatura zadržava na oko 87°C (no i to ovisi o tipu opterećenja). Pri tom rashladni sustav proizvodi maksimalnih 47 dB(A) buke (ljepše nam je uspjela fotografija s malo manjom vrijednosti). To je dosta čujno, no ništa što dobre slušalice ne mogu eliminirati. S druge strane, zahvaljujući mehanizmu koji podiže tipkovnicu ona se ne zagrijava previše. Sve u svemu, prijenosnik ima odlično riješeno hlađenje i te iz moćnog hardvera izvlači visoke i konzistentne performanse.

POVEZANI ČLANCI