Rezultati testova
UL Benchmarks
PCMark 10 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17: 7.253 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 7.253 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE: 7.185 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE 7.185 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC: 6.280 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC 6.280 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC: 6.032 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC 6.032 Dell G7 7700: 5.795 Dell G7 7700 5.795 Asus TUF Gaming A15: 5.541 Asus TUF Gaming A15 5.541 Dell Precision 7530: 5.203 Dell Precision 7530 5.203 Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H): 5.181 Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H) 5.181 Dell G5 5590: 5.135 Dell G5 5590 5.135 Asus G531GU: 5.064 Asus G531GU 5.064 Dell XPS 15 9500: 5.037 Dell XPS 15 9500 5.037 Asus ZenBook Duo 14: 4.948 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 4.948 Dell XPS 17 9700: 4.909 Dell XPS 17 9700 4.909 Dell G7 7790: 4.894 Dell G7 7790 4.894 Dell Vostro 3500: 4.605 Dell Vostro 3500 4.605 Asus UX580GE: 4.330 Asus UX580GE 4.330 Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H): 4.309 Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H) 4.309 Dell Latitude 5500: 4.306 Dell Latitude 5500 4.306 Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H): 4.256 Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-985… 4.256 Dell Vostro 3580: 4.167 Dell Vostro 3580 4.167 Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H): 4.132 Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-940… 4.132 Dell Inspiron 7386: 3.969 Dell Inspiron 7386 3.969 Dell Latitude 9510: 3.963 Dell Latitude 9510 3.963 Dell XPS 13 9380: 3.889 Dell XPS 13 9380 3.889 Dell Latitude 7490: 3.562 Dell Latitude 7490 3.562 Dell XPS 13 9365: 2.192 Dell XPS 13 9365 2.192 0 7.978
S17 pokazuje kako je tek mrvicu bolji od G15 Advanced Edition. Ovo je direktna borba top hardvera AMD vs. Intel+Nvidia od strane istog proizvođača (Asus) i ovaj rezultat najbolje demonstrira koliko je AMD daleko dogurao sa svojom mobilnom platformom.
3DMark Time Spy Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080: 10.903 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RT… 10.903 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M: 10.606 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ra… 10.606 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ: 8.068 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RT… 8.068 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ: 7.872 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX… 7.872 Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super: 7.867 Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Su… 7.867 Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ: 7.242 Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ 7.242 MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X: 6.757 MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X 6.757 Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ: 6.516 Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ 6.516 Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 2060: 6.083 Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX… 6.083 Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti: 5.368 Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti 5.368 Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ: 5.109 Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti M… 5.109 Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti: 3.831 Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650… 3.831 Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti: 3.653 Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 165… 3.653 Dell G3 3590 – GTX 1650: 3.639 Dell G3 3590 – GTX 1650 3.639 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe: 1.786 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris… 1.786 0 11.993 3DMark Port Royal Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080: 6.698 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RT… 6.698 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M: 5.515 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ra… 5.515 Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB: 5.220 Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB 5.220 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ: 4.700 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RT… 4.700 0 7.368
Ponovno bliski rezultat u Time Spyu za dvije najmoćnije mobilne grafičke kartice, no Radeonka je ipak kapitulirala u RayTracing testu – ovdje Nvidia ipak ima prednost od jedne cijele generacije.
Igre
Borderlands 3 (Badass, DX12, 2560 x 1440) GeForce RTX 3080 @ Zephyrus S17: 65,54 GeForce RTX 3080 @ Zephyru… 65,54 0 72 Dirt 5 (Ultra High, 2560 x 1440) GeForce RTX 3080 @ Zephyrus S17: 82,8 GeForce RTX 3080 @ Zephyru… 82,8 0 91 Dirt 5 (Ultra High, RayTracing ON, 2560 x 1440) Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G15: 87,2 Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G15 87,2 0 96 Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 1920 x 1080) Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080: 107 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RT… 107 Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G15: 93 Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G15 93 RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aorus 15G KC: 90 RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aorus 15G… 90 RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aero 15 KC: 76 RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aero 15 KC 76 RTX 2070 Super: 73 RTX 2070 Super 73 GTX1650 Ti: 63 GTX1650 Ti 63 : 31 31 0 118 Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 2560 x 1440) Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080: 90 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RT… 90 0 99 The Riftbreaker (Ultra, RayTracing ON, 2560 x 1440) RTX 3080 @ Quality FSR: 154,17 RTX 3080 @ Quality FSR 154,17 RTX 3080 @ Ultra Quality FSR: 114,14 RTX 3080 @ Ultra Quality F… 114,14 0 170
S obzirom na to da je ovaj ekran više rezolucije nego kod G15 AE nemamo u svim naslovima direktnu usporedbu između RTX 3080 i RX 6800M no u onom jednom u kojem imamo (Horizon Zero Dawn) ipak vidimo nadmoć Nvidijine kartice. U ostalim je testovima RTX 3080 pokazala da je dovoljno brza, a tek bi u Borderlandsu 3 možda trebalo spustiti rezoluciju za još bolji framerate.
CPU performanse i usporedba s ostalim mobilnim procesorima
Cinebench 20 Multicore CPU Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – Core i9-11900H: 5.435 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – Co… 5.435 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ryzen 9 5900HX: 5.379 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ry… 5.379 Asus TUF Gaming A15 – Ryzen 7 4800H: 3.931 Asus TUF Gaming A15 – Ryze… 3.931 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – i7 10870H: 3.625 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – i7 1… 3.625 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7 10870H: 3.424 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7… 3.424 Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H: 3.315 Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H 3.315 Dell G7 7790 – i9 9880H: 3.054 Dell G7 7790 – i9 9880H 3.054 Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 10750H: 2.928 Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 1075… 2.928 Asus G531GU – i7 9750H: 2.648 Asus G531GU – i7 9750H 2.648 Dell XPS 17 9700 – i7 10750H: 2.634 Dell XPS 17 9700 – i7 1075… 2.634 Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H: 2.560 Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H 2.560 Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8750H: 2.550 Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8… 2.550 Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H: 2.515 Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H 2.515 Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK: 2.044 Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK 2.044 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – i7 1165G7: 2.020 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – i7 1… 2.020 Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H: 1.766 Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H 1.766 Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 8665U: 1.505 Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 86… 1.505 Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-1065G7: 1.454 Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-10… 1.454 Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165G7: 1.445 Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165… 1.445 Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10810U: 1.439 Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10… 1.439 Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 8665U: 1.347 Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 86… 1.347 Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U: 1.293 Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U 1.293 Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U: 1.257 Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U 1.257 0 5.979 Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje) Ryzen 9 3900X: 157,37 Ryzen 9 3900X 157,37 Ryzen 9 5900HX: 176,69 Ryzen 9 5900HX 176,69 Core i9-11900H: 181,74 Core i9-11900H 181,74 Ryzen 7 4800H: 227,99 Ryzen 7 4800H 227,99 Ryzen 7 3700X: 232,95 Ryzen 7 3700X 232,95 Core i7 10750H: 258,08 Core i7 10750H 258,08 Ryzen 7 2700X: 264,82 Ryzen 7 2700X 264,82 i7 10870H: 275,74 i7 10870H 275,74 i5-10600K: 301,74 i5-10600K 301,74 0 332 wPrime 2.0 Ryzen 9 3900X: 56,1 Ryzen 9 3900X 56,1 Ryzen 7 3700X: 82,79 Ryzen 7 3700X 82,79 Core i9-11900H: 85,97 Core i9-11900H 85,97 Ryzen 7 2700X: 86,85 Ryzen 7 2700X 86,85 Ryzen 9 5900HX: 91,18 Ryzen 9 5900HX 91,18 Ryzen 7 4800H: 91,87 Ryzen 7 4800H 91,87 i5-10600K: 118,65 i5-10600K 118,65 Core i7 10870H: 122,274 Core i7 10870H 122,274 Core i7 10750H: 131,932 Core i7 10750H 131,932 0 145
U Cinebenchu su Core i9-11900H i AMD-ov Ryzen 9 5900HX gotovo pa izjednačeni, s malom prednošću za Intel. U Blenderu je situacija obrnuta, a u wPrimeu ponovno Intel vodi. To nam govori da su oba sličnih performansi i podjednako sposobni za teže zadaće. Ipak, za Intelov je procesor bilo potrebno naprednije hlađenje kako bi moga boostati češće na visokom taktu.
SSD performanse
Čitanje
ATTO Disk Benchmark 512K Samsung PM9A1 2TB: 6.030 Samsung PM9A1 2TB 6.030 WDC SN730 1TB: 2.970 WDC SN730 1TB 2.970 SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G7: 2.950 SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G7 2.950 Kingston OM8PCP3512F: 2.920 Kingston OM8PCP3512F 2.920 SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 15: 2.920 SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 15 2.920 Toshiba XG6 512GB: 2.900 Toshiba XG6 512GB 2.900 Samsung PM991a 512 GB: 2.810 Samsung PM991a 512 GB 2.810 Gigabyte SSD 512GB: 2.750 Gigabyte SSD 512GB 2.750 Samsung PM981a 1TB: 2.730 Samsung PM981a 1TB 2.730 Kioxia XG6 1TB: 2.710 Kioxia XG6 1TB 2.710 Samsung 960 Evo 1TB: 2.473,4 Samsung 960 Evo 1TB 2.473,4 Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G3: 2.350 Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G3 2.350 Toshiba BG4 256 GB: 2.220 Toshiba BG4 256 GB 2.220 Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 3500: 2.210 Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro… 2.210 Kioxia BG4 512GB: 2.170 Kioxia BG4 512GB 2.170 SK Hynix PC401 512GB: 2.080 SK Hynix PC401 512GB 2.080 Toshiba BG3 512GB: 1.521,9 Toshiba BG3 512GB 1.521,9 WDC PC SN520 @ G3: 1.480,1 WDC PC SN520 @ G3 1.480,1 WDC PC SN520 256 GB: 1.440 WDC PC SN520 256 GB 1.440 Toshiba BG3 256GB: 1.370 Toshiba BG3 256GB 1.370 Toshiba BG3 512GB: 1.340 Toshiba BG3 512GB 1.340 Toshiba BG3 256GB: 1.340 Toshiba BG3 256GB 1.340 Toshiba BG3 512GB: 1.210 Toshiba BG3 512GB 1.210 Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G: 1.040,22 Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G 1.040,22 SK Hynix SC311 256GB: 741,61 SK Hynix SC311 256GB 741,61 Toshiba MQ04ABF100: 563,66 Toshiba MQ04ABF100 563,66 ST1000LM035: 120 ST1000LM035 120 WDC WD10SPZX @ G3: 104,38 WDC WD10SPZX @ G3 104,38 : 102 102 0 6.633 Zapis
ATTO Disk Benchmark 512K Samsung PM9A1 2TB: 4.770 Samsung PM9A1 2TB 4.770 WDC SN730 1TB: 2.830 WDC SN730 1TB 2.830 Samsung PM981a 1TB: 2.810 Samsung PM981a 1TB 2.810 Gigabyte SSD 512GB: 2.350 Gigabyte SSD 512GB 2.350 SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 15: 2.280 SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 15 2.280 Samsung 960 Evo 1TB: 2.210 Samsung 960 Evo 1TB 2.210 SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G7: 1.690 SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G7 1.690 Kioxia XG6 1TB: 1.600 Kioxia XG6 1TB 1.600 Samsung PM991a 512 GB: 1.480 Samsung PM991a 512 GB 1.480 Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G3: 1.460 Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G3 1.460 WDC PC SN520 @ G3: 1.370 WDC PC SN520 @ G3 1.370 WDC PC SN520 256 GB: 1.340 WDC PC SN520 256 GB 1.340 Kioxia BG4 512GB: 1.330 Kioxia BG4 512GB 1.330 Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 3500: 1.310 Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro… 1.310 Toshiba BG3 256GB: 1.210 Toshiba BG3 256GB 1.210 Toshiba BG4 256 GB: 1.080 Toshiba BG4 256 GB 1.080 Kingston OM8PCP3512F: 932,72 Kingston OM8PCP3512F 932,72 Toshiba BG3 256GB: 690 Toshiba BG3 256GB 690 SK Hynix PC401 512GB: 636,1 SK Hynix PC401 512GB 636,1 Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G: 540 Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G 540 SK Hynix SC311 256GB: 349,52 SK Hynix SC311 256GB 349,52 Toshiba BG3 512GB: 344 Toshiba BG3 512GB 344 Toshiba MQ04ABF100: 102 Toshiba MQ04ABF100 102 WDC WD10SPZX @ G3: 96,6 WDC WD10SPZX @ G3 96,6 ST1000LM035: 85,91 ST1000LM035 85,91 0 5.247
Performanse Samsungovog PM9A1 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD-a su izvrsne i tu nemamo što više za dodati.
Autonomija
4K@30fps playback Dell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh: 875 Dell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh 875 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh: 634 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90… 634 Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh: 518 Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh 518 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh: 470 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh 470 Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh: 465 Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh 465 Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh: 409 Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh 409 Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh: 375 Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh 375 Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh: 374 Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh 374 Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh: 367 Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh 367 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh: 346 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90… 346 Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh: 345 Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh 345 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh: 332 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99… 332 Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh: 318 Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh 318 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh: 312 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh 312 Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh: 274 Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh 274 Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh: 272 Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh 272 Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh: 256 Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh 256 G531GU – 67 Wh: 255 G531GU – 67 Wh 255 G3 3590 – 51 Wh: 239 G3 3590 – 51 Wh 239 G5 5590 – 60 Wh: 237 G5 5590 – 60 Wh 237 Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh: 221 Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh 221 Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh: 205 Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh 205 : 195 195 0 963
Autonomija nije sjajna i tu je G15 Advanced Edition pokazao znatno bolji menadžment energijom. Jasno, razlika je u veličini ekrana i rezoluciji no svejedno, rezultat all AMD laptopa je i dalje impresivan. No, ni skoro 6 sati sa Zephyrusom nije za odbaciti.
Zagrijavanje, buka i taktovi
Kao i uvijek, testiramo s maksimalnim performansama rashladnog sustava kako bi utvrdili najbolje performanse koje prijenosnik može dati. Maksimalni boost takt procesora u ovom prijenosniku je oko 4,79 GHz uz maksimalnu temperaturu od 94°C prije nego nastupi spuštanje takta na oko konstantnih 4,6 GHz pod opterećenjem pri čemu se temperatura zadržava na oko 87°C (no i to ovisi o tipu opterećenja). Pri tom rashladni sustav proizvodi maksimalnih 47 dB(A) buke (ljepše nam je uspjela fotografija s malo manjom vrijednosti). To je dosta čujno, no ništa što dobre slušalice ne mogu eliminirati. S druge strane, zahvaljujući mehanizmu koji podiže tipkovnicu ona se ne zagrijava previše. Sve u svemu, prijenosnik ima odlično riješeno hlađenje i te iz moćnog hardvera izvlači visoke i konzistentne performanse.
