ASUS STRIX GTX1050 Ti OC recenzija

· · Video · Stranica 5 od 7

Rezultati testova – treći dio

OpenCL testovi

Basemark v.1.1

Optimized full profileRadeon Pro Duo454,2Radeon R9 295X2435,4Nvidia GTX1080431,0Sapphire Radeon RX 470 OC429,8MSI GTX1070 Gaming X409,0FirePro W8100 @ desktop374,5ASUS GTX960 Turbo251,8Sapphire RX 460 Nitro OC 4GB241,6ASUS STRIX GTX1050Ti OC239,8FirePro W8100 @ eGPU237,8MSI GTX1050 2GB OC225,8Gigabyte R7 360 OC215,6FirePro M6100182,70500

U prvom OpenCL benchmarku je Ti model za malo iznad 6% brži od non-Ti verzije.

Luxmark v.2.0

RoomRadeon Pro Duo3.328,0Radeon R9 295X23.013,0MSI GTX1070 Gaming X2.429,0Nvidia GTX10802.175,0MSI GTX1060 Gaming X1.829,0Sapphire Radeon RX 470 OC1.509,0FirePro W8100 @ desktop1.194,0ASUS STRIX GTX1050Ti OC1.178,0MSI GTX1050 2GB OC1.077,0FirePro W8100 @ eGPU1.008,0ASUS GTX960 Turbo981,0Sapphire RX 460 Nitro OC 4GB820,0Gigabyte R7 360 OC654,0FirePro M6100529,003.661

Ovdje je razlika između GTX1050 Ti i GTX1050 oko 9.4% – u korist Ti naravno.

ratGPU v.0.8.0

HighRadeon Pro Duo54,5Radeon R9 295X266,4Nvidia GTX108099,6MSI GTX1070 Gaming X103,4Sapphire Radeon RX 470 OC124,1MSI GTX1060 Gaming X135,0FirePro W8100 @ desktop149,7FirePro W8100 @ eGPU200,5ASUS STRIX GTX1050Ti OC208,1MSI GTX1050 2GB OC229,9ASUS GTX960 Turbo234,3Sapphire RX 460 Nitro OC 4GB239,0Gigabyte R7 360 OC294,8FirePro M6100424,40467

I u Ray-trace benchmarku je razlika oko 9.4 % u korist Ti kartice.