ASUS Zenbook A14 recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Mobilno · Stranica 2 od 3

Rezultati testova

Sintetika

UL 3DMark Time Spy

3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 409020.355,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 409014.061,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 407012.490,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX407011.651,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 407010.818,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 406010.815,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 308010.240,0Gigabyte G6X – RTX 40609.844,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S8.861,0Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40608.068,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.867,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX40507.765,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.242,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ6.975,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ6.855,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti4.793,0Asus Zenbook S 14 – Intel Xe2 (Full-speed mod)4.332,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Intel Arc3.648,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus ExpertBook P5 – Intel Xe 23.581,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Radeon 890M3.560,0Asus Zenbook S 14 – Intel Xe2 (Standard mod)3.481,0Asus Zenbook Duo (2024) – Intel Arc3.201,0Asus Zenbook A14 – Adreno X1E-781.921,0Asus Vivobook S 15 – Adreno X1E-781.841,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe1.835,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – Iris Xe1.527,0022.391

Kao što smo napomenuli i kod testa Vivobooka S15 opremljenog istim procesorom ili SoC-om, PCMark ne radi s Quallcommovim rješenjima pa odmah prelazimo na grafički test. On pokazuje kako je Adreno X1E-78 sličnih performansi kao Intelove Iris Arc ili Xe, te kako je puno slabija od AMD-ove Radeon 890M grafike. Zanimljivo je ipak da je u ovom prijenosniku ta grafika nešto brža nego kod Vivobooka S15 u normalnom načinu rada. U punoj brzini ventilatora to još dodatno naraste na 1.999.

UL 3DMark CPU

3DMark CPU ProfileCore i7-14700K14.381,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 -i9-14900HX11.650,0Asus Vivobook S 15 – Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-1009.370,0Asus Zenbook A14 – Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-1009.150,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX9.033,0Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX8.201,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H7.684,0Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H7.574,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H7.356,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS7.291,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H7.131,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 3706.588,0Asus ExpertBook P5 – Core Ultra 7 258V5.977,0Asus Zenbook S 14 – Core Ultra 7 258V5.675,0Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H5.495,0015.819

CPU performanse su malo slabije kod A14 nego kod S15 u normalnom načinu rada (Standard za ventilatore), a kad aprebacimo na punu brzinu performanse rastu na solidnih 9.632 bodova.

CPU Performanse

Cinebench 23

Cinebench 23 Multicore CPURyzen 9 7950X37.776,0Core i7-14700K35.503,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX32.274,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX28.895,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX20.427,0Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX19.552,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H17.087,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H15.962,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode)15.599,0Ryzen 5 7600X15.409,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS15.115,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)13.846,0Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H13.714,0Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H12.986,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H12.253,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)12.039,0Asus Vivobook S 15 – Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-10010.650,0Asus Zenbook A14 – Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-1009.532,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)8.143,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U5.808,0041.554 Cinebench 23 Singlecore CPUAsus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode)1.914,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)1.846,0Asus Vivobook S 15 – Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-1001.115,0Asus Zenbook A14 – Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-1001.099,002.105

Cinebench 24 test kao što znamo iz testa S15 ne radi jer procesor ne podržava AVX. Cinebench 23 s druge strane to ne traži. U ovdje je u standardnom režimu rada procesor sporiji nego kod S15, dok u punoj brzini ventilatora postiže respektabilnijih 11.897/1119 bodova.

Blender

Blender Gooseberry Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K317,8Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX474,3Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H713,5Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)784,0Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX842,6Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX901,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H946,9Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H949,9Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS1.158,1Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)1.195,5Asus Vivobook S 15 – Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-1001.349,9Asus Zenbook S 14 – Core Ultra 7 258V (Full-speed mode)1.433,7Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H1.450,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)1.559,5Asus Zenbook A14 – Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 (Standard mode)1.582,0Asus Zenbook S 14 – Core Ultra 7 258V (Standard mode)1.749,7Asus ExpertBook P5 – Core Ultra 7 258V (Standard mode)1.797,201.977

U standard ili normalnom modu rada i ovdje kod dugotrajnog testa A14 se pokazao slabiji od S15. S15 ima veću šasiju i bolje hlađenje.

Autonomija

4K@30fps playbackAsus Zenbook A14 – 70Wh1.248,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 75 Wh846,0Asus Zenbook S 14 – 72 Wh801,0Asus ExpertBook P5 – 63 Wh785,0Asus Vivobook S 15 – 70 Wh781,0Asus ZenBook S 16 – 78 Wh641,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh634,0Asus Zenbook Duo – 75 Wh612,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 63 Wh557,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – 90 Wh436,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63Wh435,0Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – 99 Wh396,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 90 Wh390,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76 Wh390,0Acer Swift X 14 – 76Wh389,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh359,0Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh346,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh345,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh332,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh323,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh318,0Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh312,0Razer Blade 14 – 68 Wh302,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 54 Wh295,0Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh274,0Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh272,0G531GU – 67 Wh256,0G3 3590 – 51 Wh255,0G5 5590 – 60 Wh239,0Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh237,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – 90 Wh232,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 90Wh229,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh221,0Gigabyte G6X – 73Wh217,0Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh184,001.373

Autonomija je sjajna! Skoro 21 sat reprodukcije video materijala znači da možete bez problema izgurati dva radna dana bez punjenja ovog prijenosnika. Znali smo da Snapdragon ima izvrsnu efikasnost, no ona se očito još može poboljšati kada se upari s ekranom koji manje troši.

Zagrijavanje i buka

Kao što smo već ranije naglasili, prijenosnik smo pretežno testirali u tvorničkom Standard modu i u njemu su ventilatori iznimno tihi (38,7 dB(A)), a zagrijavanje radne površine, tj. tipkovnice nije visoko. Temperatura površine ostaje ugodna i maksimum koji smo izmjerili infracrvenim termometrom je bio na 36°C. U full brzini ventilatora buka raste na 50,5 pa ako želite maksimalne performanse to je nešto na što morate biti spremni.

POVEZANI ČLANCI