ASUS Zenbook S 16 recenzija

· · Mobilno · Stranica 2 od 3

Rezultati testova

Sintetika

UL PCMark 10 PCMark 10Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY)12.618,0Razer Blade 14 (2023)8.059,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G147.660,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2023)7.603,0Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024)7.370,0Asus Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)7.304,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (GU605)7.263,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S177.253,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE7.185,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 177.176,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF7.062,0Asus Zenbook Duo (2024)6.959,0Asus ROG Strix G166.635,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024)6.560,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405 – Performance mode)6.384,0Dell XPS 17 97106.342,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC6.280,0Dell XPS 15 95206.273,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405 – Standard mode)6.260,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC6.032,0Dell G7 77005.795,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED5.623,0Asus Asus TUF Gaming A155.541,0Dell Precision 75305.203,0Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H)5.181,0Dell G5 55905.135,0Asus G531GU5.064,0Dell XPS 15 95005.037,0Asus ZenBook Duo 144.948,0Dell XPS 17 97004.909,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED4.894,0Dell G7 77904.768,0Dell Vostro 35004.605,0Asus UX580GE4.330,0Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H)4.309,0Dell Latitude 55004.306,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H)4.256,0Dell Vostro 35804.167,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H)4.132,0Dell Inspiron 73863.969,0Dell Latitude 95103.963,0Dell XPS 13 93803.889,0Dell Latitude 74903.562,0Dell XPS 13 93652.192,0013.880 Prije nego krenemo s komentarima na testove svakako trebamo objasniti da su svi testovi napravljeni u Standard modu, osim ako nije drugačije naglašeno. PCMark rezultat je odličan i dokaz je da je ovo izvrstan prijenosnik za sve zadatke i standardne kućne te uredske poslove. UL 3DMark Time Spy 3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 409020.355,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 409014.061,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 407012.490,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX407011.651,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 407010.818,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 406010.815,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 308010.240,0Gigabyte G6X – RTX 40609.844,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S8.861,0Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40608.068,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.867,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX40507.765,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.242,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ6.975,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ6.855,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti4.793,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Intel Arc3.648,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Radeon 890M3.481,0Asus Zenbook Duo (2024) – Intel Arc3.201,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe1.835,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – Iris Xe1.527,0022.391 UL 3DMark Port Royal 3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 409013.080,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 409010.108,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 40707.165,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX40707.063,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 40706.725,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 30806.698,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 30806.328,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 40605.882,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M5.515,0Gigabyte G6X – RTX 40605.350,0Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.700,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX 40504.167,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.017,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX6800S3.923,0Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40603.819,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Radeon 890M1.256,0014.388 UL 3DMark Speed Way 3DMark Speed WayAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 40905.358,0Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC5.156,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 40904.072,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 40702.903,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 40702.723,0Gigabyte G6X – RTX 40602.346,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX 40501.795,0Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 40601.626,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Radeon 890M257,005.894 Grafički testovi pokazuju kako je Radeon 890M kartica solidna za jednu integrianu, no i kako se nećete previše moći igrati. Možda pokoji stariji naslov u nižoj rezoluciji i s nižim grafičkim postavkama. UL 3DMark CPU 3DMark CPU ProfileCore i7-14700K14.381,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 -i9-14900HX11.650,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX9.033,0Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX8.201,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H7.684,0Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H7.574,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H7.356,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS7.291,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H7.131,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 3706.588,0Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H5.495,0015.819 Performanse procesora su sasvim solidne, a u ovom su slučaju u Standard modu nešto niže od Intelovog Core Ultra 7 155H procesora. Standard mod malo koči procesor, da se razmaše u potpunosti, a kad koristimo Full-speed za ventilator tada performanse rastu na 7055 bodova.

AI testovi

 

AMD-ov Amuse 2.0.0 Beta je program koji korisnicima omogućuje generiranje visokokvalitetnih slika s AI modelima na modernim računalima temeljenim na AMD hardveru. Amuse zahtijeva procesore AMD Ryzen AI serije 300 s najmanje 24 GB RAM-a ili Radeon RX 7000 sustav s najmanje 32 GB memorije. Također će raditi na sustavima izgrađenim oko procesora serije Ryzen 8040, sve dok imaju najmanje 32 GB RAM-a. Dakle, riječ je o prilično modernim i premium sustavima. Amuse 2.0.0 Beta omogućuje korisnicima generiranje visokokvalitetnih slika s AI modelima, pretvaranje slika i crteža u digitalne slike i stvaranje prilagođenih AI filtara. Jedna od ključnih značajki softvera je korištenje AMD XDNA Super Resolutiona, tehnologije koja slike povećava s 512×512 na 1024×1024 – ubrzavajući vrijeme stvaranja slike. AMD kaže da korisnici mogu kreirati slike od nule, pretvoriti svoje ručno nacrtane umjetnine u digitalni format i primijeniti ili stvoriti prilagođene AI filtre za izmjenu izgleda postojećih slika. Kao što vidimo na dnu, Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 je sliku svemirca generirao za 25,3 sekunde s 2,7 iteracije po sekundi. Kako nam budu pristizali procesori s NPU-ima ćemo ih testirati s ovim softverom i moći vidjeti razlike između modela.

Performanse u igrama

Company of Heroes 3 Company of Heroes 3 (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G16156,0Nvidia RTX 4090 @ Zephyrus G16153,5Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 16136,0Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17128,8Sapphire RX 7600 Pulse OC127,2Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Gigabyte G6X121,1Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Blade 1499,6RTX 4050 @ Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024)81,8Radeon 890M @ Zenbook S 1645,00172 F1 22 F1 22 (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G16211,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 16174,0Nvidia RTX 4090 @ Zephyrus G16172,0Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Gigabyte G6X171,0RTX 4050 @ Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024)131,0Radeon 890M @ Zenbook S 1630,00232 The Calisto Protocol The Calisto Protocol (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4090 @ Zephyrus G1696,5Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G1681,0RTX 4070 @ Blade 1480,4Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 1679,1RTX 4060 @ Aorus 1771,0Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Gigabyte G6X69,1RTX 4050 @ Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024)53,6Radeon 890M @ Zenbook S 1615,20106 Od igara smo isprobali Company of Heores 3 a na maksimalnim je postavkama i pri rezoluciji od 1080p prosječan broj sličica u sekundi bio 44,96. Uključivanjem FSR-a rastu performanse, ali i kvaliteta slike opada. F1 22 u punoj kvaliteti i pri 1080p radi s prosječnih tek 30 sličica u sekundi i tu se nećete previše naigrati. Sve u svemu, ako se želite igrati, morate biti spremni na velike kompromise.

CPU Performanse

Cinebench 23 Cinebench 23 Multicore CPURyzen 9 7950X37.776,0Core i7-14700K35.503,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX32.274,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX28.895,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX20.427,0Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX19.552,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H17.087,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H15.962,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode)15.599,0Ryzen 5 7600X15.409,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS15.115,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)13.846,0Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H13.714,0Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H12.986,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H12.253,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)12.039,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)8.143,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U5.808,0041.554 Cinebench 23 Singlecore CPUAsus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode)1.914,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)1.846,002.105 Ovdje smo pokazali performanse oba moda rada i vidimo kako je razlika zapravo dosta velika. Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 zapravo ima puno veći potencijal od onoga u Standard modu, a u debljem prijenosniku s moćnijim hlađenjem vjerojatno i još veće performanse od onih u full-speed modu. Bilo kako bilo, riječ je o sasvim solidnom procesoru koji će poslužiti i za konkretnije zadaće. Cinebench 24 Cinebench 24 Multicore CPUAsus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode)914,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)826,001.005 Cinebench 24 Singlecore CPUAsus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode)111,0Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)109,00122 Razlike su solidne i u novijem Cinebenchu. Blender Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K68,2Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX77,7Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX95,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX122,1Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H133,1Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)150,8Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H154,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX158,4Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS167,2Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H170,2Ryzen 9 5900HX176,7Core i9-11900H181,7Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17182,2AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus ROG Zephyrus G14185,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)199,6Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H212,8Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H217,1Ryzen 7 4800H228,0Ryzen 7 3700X233,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK237,3Core i7 10750H258,1Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7 10870H275,7i5-10600K301,7Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)377,1Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U451,30496 Blender Gooseberry Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i7-14700K317,8Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX474,3Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H713,5Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)784,0Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX842,6Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX901,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H946,9Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H949,9Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS1.158,1Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode)1.195,5Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H1.450,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)1.559,501.715 U Blenderu smo napravili testove samo u Standard modu i vidimo kako je procesor moćniji od konkurentnog i7-13650HX-a koji podržava ukupno 20 threadova. Handbrake Handbrake (FPS)Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX88,8Core i7-14700K79,5Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H69,4Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX59,2Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H58,2Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode)53,8Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H50,9Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode)48,7Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H46,2098 U Handbrakeu je opet nešto malo sporiji od Core Ultra 7 155H.

SSD performanse

Čitanje ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 1612.400,0SKHynix P41 2TB6.640,0Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift X 146.620,0Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB6.533,0Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB – G6X6.530,0Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB6.500,0Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 146.210,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB6.030,0Micron 3400 1TB – Zenbook S 13 OLED5.930,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.950,0Micron 2400 1 TB – ZenBook S 164.740,0Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G164.600,0WDC PC SN560 1TB – Zenbook 14 OLED4.380,0Micron 2450 1TB3.440,0Toshiba 1TB3.340,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.200,0WDC SN730 1TB2.970,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920,0Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730,0Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35002.210,0Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,2SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,6Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,7ST1000LM035120,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,4102,0013.640 Zapis ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 169.720,0SKHynix P41 2TB5.940,0Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB5.221,0Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift X 144.820,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB4.770,0Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB4.640,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.620,0Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 144.610,0Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB – G6X4.600,0Micron 2450 1TB4.600,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.950,0Micron 2400 1 TB – ZenBook S 163.420,0Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G163.380,0WDC SN730 1TB3.210,0WDC PC SN560 1TB – Zenbook 14 OLED3.080,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.830,0Toshiba 1TB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.460,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.350,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.280,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.210,0Kioxia XG6 1TB1.690,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.600,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.480,0WDC PC SN520 @ G31.460,0WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.370,0Kioxia BG4 512GB1.340,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35001.330,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.310,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.210,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F1.080,0Toshiba BG3 256GB932,7SK Hynix PC401 512GB690,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G636,1SK Hynix SC311 256GB540,0Toshiba BG3 512GB349,5Toshiba MQ04ABF100344,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3102,0ST1000LM03596,685,9010.692 Micronov 2400 SSD nije najbrži u ponudi, no i unatoč mrvicu slabijim performansama to se ne osjeti u svakodnevnom radu.

Memorijske performanse 

AIDA Memory AIDA Memory – ReadAsus ZenBook S 16 – 32GB DDR5-750088.288,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-750085.641,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560084.544,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-750084.173,0Asus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-750082.439,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480067.783,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480067.756,0Gigabyte G6X – 2x8GB DDR5-480067.240,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-480064.865,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80063.180,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560061.175,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480059.126,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.666,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20047.154,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR546.644,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.936,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.504,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00041.081,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.979,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.898,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99338.500,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.827,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.721,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293337.280,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266635.413,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.425,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240032.884,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.876,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66729.969,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213329.688,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.488,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.827,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L27.155,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213326.830,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320024.509,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.290,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L23.120,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L21.151,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L19.772,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L18.210,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.787,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.639,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.292,0097.117 AIDA Memory – WriteAsus ZenBook S 16 – 32GB DDR5-7500101.490,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560077.484,0Asus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-750076.044,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-750074.750,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-750074.709,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR574.078,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80071.123,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560066.366,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480060.204,0Gigabyte G6X – 2x8GB DDR5-480060.053,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-480060.052,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480059.499,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480057.583,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480055.150,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.592,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00044.859,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293344.706,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.098,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93340.291,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99339.635,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93339.627,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.798,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266637.621,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.124,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240034.834,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.035,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66733.310,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.951,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213331.835,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L31.531,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20031.460,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213331.017,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213328.479,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L26.818,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L24.970,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.893,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320023.107,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L19.776,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.929,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.815,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L17.759,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.439,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L14.544,00111.639 AIDA Memory – copyAsus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-750093.482,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-750092.463,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-750088.667,0Asus ZenBook S 16 – 32GB DDR5-750082.281,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-560077.918,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80064.509,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560061.611,0ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-480060.167,0Gigabyte G6X – 2x8GB DDR5-480059.454,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR559.159,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-480058.908,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480058.746,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.082,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480048.811,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20041.091,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00040.090,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20040.025,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293338.128,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20036.926,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93335.188,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93334.508,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99333.186,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266632.709,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66732.163,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.871,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.333,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240030.654,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.712,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99329.405,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213328.446,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66727.379,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.082,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L26.430,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213325.618,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.606,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.296,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320022.232,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L20.839,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L19.047,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.016,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.863,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.798,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.220,00102.830 Memorijske performanse su solidne za DDR5-4800 specifikaciju.

Autonomija

4K@30fps playbackDell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875,0Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 75 Wh846,0Asus ZenBook S 16 – 78 Wh641,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh634,0Asus Zenbook Duo – 75 Wh612,0Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 63 Wh557,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – 90 Wh436,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63Wh435,0Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – 99 Wh396,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 90 Wh390,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76 Wh390,0Acer Swift X 14 – 76Wh389,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh359,0Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh346,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh345,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh332,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh323,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh318,0Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh312,0Razer Blade 14 – 68 Wh302,0Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 54 Wh295,0Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh274,0Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh272,0G531GU – 67 Wh256,0G3 3590 – 51 Wh255,0G5 5590 – 60 Wh239,0Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh237,0Asus ROG Strix G16 – 90 Wh232,0Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 90Wh229,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh221,0Gigabyte G6X – 73Wh217,0Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh184,00963 Baterija kapaciteta od 78 Wh osigurava odličnu autonomiju od gotovo 11 sati u playbacku 4K materijala. To znači da uredskog posla može odraditi još više. Pohvalno je i što unutar MyAsus aplikacije možete uključiti i Battery Care Mode koja ograničava punjenje do 80%.

Zagrijavanje i buka

 

Standard mod

Full-Speed mod

Kao što smo već ranije naglasili, prijenosnik smo testirali u tvorničkom Standard modu i u njemu su ventilatori iznimno tihi, a zagrijavanje radne površine, tj. tipkovnice je dosta visoko. Ako poželite više performanse dva su moda – Performance i Full-speed. U potonjem buka nešto naraste no nije iznimno bučno pa se i dalje može raditi uz njega dok ne završite taj intenzivni posao koji ste započeli. Ujedno, tada je i radna površina nešto hladnija. Preporuka je ipak držati ga u Standard modu gdje je gotovo pa nečujan. Ako želite još nižu potrošnju energije i buke, tada je Whisper mod za vas.