Rezultati testova
Sintetika
UL PCMark 10
PCMark 10 Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) 12.618,0 Razer Blade 14 (2023) 8.059,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 7.660,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2023) 7.603,0 Gigabyte G6X 9KG (2024) 7.370,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) 7.304,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (GU605) 7.263,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 7.253,0 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE 7.185,0 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 7.176,0 Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF 7.062,0 Asus Zenbook Duo (2024) 6.959,0 Asus ROG Strix G16 6.635,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) 6.560,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405 – Performance mode) 6.384,0 Dell XPS 17 9710 6.342,0 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC 6.280,0 Dell XPS 15 9520 6.273,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED (UX3405 – Standard mode) 6.260,0 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC 6.032,0 Dell G7 7700 5.795,0 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED 5.623,0 Asus Asus TUF Gaming A15 5.541,0 Dell Precision 7530 5.203,0 Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H) 5.181,0 Dell G5 5590 5.135,0 Asus G531GU 5.064,0 Dell XPS 15 9500 5.037,0 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 4.948,0 Dell XPS 17 9700 4.909,0 Asus Zenbook 14X OLED 4.894,0 Dell G7 7790 4.768,0 Dell Vostro 3500 4.605,0 Asus UX580GE 4.330,0 Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H) 4.309,0 Dell Latitude 5500 4.306,0 Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H) 4.256,0 Dell Vostro 3580 4.167,0 Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H) 4.132,0 Dell Inspiron 7386 3.969,0 Dell Latitude 9510 3.963,0 Dell XPS 13 9380 3.889,0 Dell Latitude 7490 3.562,0 Dell XPS 13 9365 2.192,0 0 13.880
Prije nego krenemo s komentarima na testove svakako trebamo objasniti da su svi testovi napravljeni u Standard modu, osim ako nije drugačije naglašeno.
PCMark rezultat je odličan i dokaz je da je ovo izvrstan prijenosnik za sve zadatke i standardne kućne te uredske poslove.
UL 3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 4090 20.355,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 4090 14.061,0 Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4070 12.490,0 Razer Blade 14 – RTX4070 11.651,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080 10.903,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 4070 10.818,0 Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 4060 10.815,0 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M 10.606,0 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 3080 10.240,0 Gigabyte G6X – RTX 4060 9.844,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S 8.861,0 Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 4060 8.068,0 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ 7.872,0 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ 7.867,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX4050 7.765,0 Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super 7.242,0 Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ 6.975,0 Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ 6.855,0 MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X 6.757,0 Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ 6.516,0 Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 2060 6.083,0 Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti 5.368,0 Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ 5.109,0 Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti 4.793,0 Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti 3.831,0 Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti 3.653,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Intel Arc 3.648,0 Dell G3 3590 – GTX 1650 3.639,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Radeon 890M 3.481,0 Asus Zenbook Duo (2024) – Intel Arc 3.201,0 Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe 1.835,0 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe 1.786,0 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – Iris Xe 1.527,0 0 22.391
UL 3DMark Port Royal
3DMark Port Royal Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 4090 13.080,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 4090 10.108,0 Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4070 7.165,0 Razer Blade 14 – RTX4070 7.063,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 4070 6.725,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 3080 6.698,0 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 3080 6.328,0 Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 4060 5.882,0 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M 5.515,0 Gigabyte G6X – RTX 4060 5.350,0 Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB 5.220,0 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ 4.700,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX 4050 4.167,0 Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ 4.017,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX6800S 3.923,0 Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 4060 3.819,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Radeon 890M 1.256,0 0 14.388
UL 3DMark Speed Way
3DMark Speed Way Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 4090 5.358,0 Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC 5.156,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – RTX 4090 4.072,0 Asus ROG Strix G16 – RTX 4070 2.903,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – RTX 4070 2.723,0 Gigabyte G6X – RTX 4060 2.346,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – RTX 4050 1.795,0 Acer Swift X 14 – RTX 4060 1.626,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Radeon 890M 257,0 0 5.894
Grafički testovi pokazuju kako je Radeon 890M kartica solidna za jednu integrianu, no i kako se nećete previše moći igrati. Možda pokoji stariji naslov u nižoj rezoluciji i s nižim grafičkim postavkama.
UL 3DMark CPU
3DMark CPU Profile Core i7-14700K 14.381,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 -i9-14900HX 11.650,0 Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX 9.033,0 Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX 8.201,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H 7.684,0 Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H 7.574,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H 7.356,0 Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS 7.291,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H 7.131,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 6.588,0 Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H 5.495,0 0 15.819
Performanse procesora su sasvim solidne, a u ovom su slučaju u Standard modu nešto niže od Intelovog Core Ultra 7 155H procesora. Standard mod malo koči procesor, da se razmaše u potpunosti, a kad koristimo Full-speed za ventilator tada performanse rastu na 7055 bodova.
AI testovi
AMD-ov Amuse 2.0.0 Beta je program koji korisnicima omogućuje generiranje visokokvalitetnih slika s AI modelima na modernim računalima temeljenim na AMD hardveru. Amuse zahtijeva procesore AMD Ryzen AI serije 300 s najmanje 24 GB RAM-a ili Radeon RX 7000 sustav s najmanje 32 GB memorije. Također će raditi na sustavima izgrađenim oko procesora serije Ryzen 8040, sve dok imaju najmanje 32 GB RAM-a. Dakle, riječ je o prilično modernim i premium sustavima. Amuse 2.0.0 Beta omogućuje korisnicima generiranje visokokvalitetnih slika s AI modelima, pretvaranje slika i crteža u digitalne slike i stvaranje prilagođenih AI filtara.
Jedna od ključnih značajki softvera je korištenje AMD XDNA Super Resolutiona, tehnologije koja slike povećava s 512×512 na 1024×1024 – ubrzavajući vrijeme stvaranja slike. AMD kaže da korisnici mogu kreirati slike od nule, pretvoriti svoje ručno nacrtane umjetnine u digitalni format i primijeniti ili stvoriti prilagođene AI filtre za izmjenu izgleda postojećih slika.
Kao što vidimo na dnu, Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 je sliku svemirca generirao za 25,3 sekunde s 2,7 iteracije po sekundi. Kako nam budu pristizali procesori s NPU-ima ćemo ih testirati s ovim softverom i moći vidjeti razlike između modela.
Performanse u igrama
Company of Heroes 3
Company of Heroes 3 (1920 x 1080) Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G16 156,0 Nvidia RTX 4090 @ Zephyrus G16 153,5 Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 16 136,0 Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17 128,8 Sapphire RX 7600 Pulse OC 127,2 Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Gigabyte G6X 121,1 Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Blade 14 99,6 RTX 4050 @ Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) 81,8 Radeon 890M @ Zenbook S 16 45,0 0 172
F1 22
F1 22 (1920 x 1080) Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G16 211,0 Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 16 174,0 Nvidia RTX 4090 @ Zephyrus G16 172,0 Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Gigabyte G6X 171,0 RTX 4050 @ Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) 131,0 Radeon 890M @ Zenbook S 16 30,0 0 232
The Calisto Protocol
The Calisto Protocol (1920 x 1080) Nvidia RTX 4090 @ Zephyrus G16 96,5 Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Strix G16 81,0 RTX 4070 @ Blade 14 80,4 Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Helios Neo 16 79,1 RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17 71,0 Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Gigabyte G6X 69,1 RTX 4050 @ Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) 53,6 Radeon 890M @ Zenbook S 16 15,2 0 106
Od igara smo isprobali Company of Heores 3 a na maksimalnim je postavkama i pri rezoluciji od 1080p prosječan broj sličica u sekundi bio 44,96. Uključivanjem FSR-a rastu performanse, ali i kvaliteta slike opada. F1 22 u punoj kvaliteti i pri 1080p radi s prosječnih tek 30 sličica u sekundi i tu se nećete previše naigrati. Sve u svemu, ako se želite igrati, morate biti spremni na velike kompromise.
CPU Performanse
Cinebench 23
Cinebench 23 Multicore CPU Ryzen 9 7950X 37.776,0 Core i7-14700K 35.503,0 Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX 32.274,0 Ryzen 9 7900X 29.303,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX 28.895,0 Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX 20.427,0 Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX 19.552,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H 17.087,0 Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H 15.962,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode) 15.599,0 Ryzen 5 7600X 15.409,0 Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS 15.115,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode) 13.846,0 Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H 13.714,0 Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H 12.986,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H 12.253,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode) 12.039,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode) 8.143,0 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U 5.808,0 0 41.554
Cinebench 23 Singlecore CPU Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode) 1.914,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode) 1.846,0 0 2.105
Ovdje smo pokazali performanse oba moda rada i vidimo kako je razlika zapravo dosta velika. Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 zapravo ima puno veći potencijal od onoga u Standard modu, a u debljem prijenosniku s moćnijim hlađenjem vjerojatno i još veće performanse od onih u full-speed modu. Bilo kako bilo, riječ je o sasvim solidnom procesoru koji će poslužiti i za konkretnije zadaće.
Cinebench 24
Cinebench 24 Multicore CPU Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode) 914,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode) 826,0 0 1.005
Cinebench 24 Singlecore CPU Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Full-speed mode) 111,0 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode) 109,0 0 122
Razlike su solidne i u novijem Cinebenchu.
Blender
Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje) Core i7-14700K 68,2 Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX 77,7 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX 95,0 Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX 122,1 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H 133,1 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode) 150,8 Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H 154,6 Ryzen 9 3900X 157,4 Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX 158,4 Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS 167,2 Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H 170,2 Ryzen 9 5900HX 176,7 Core i9-11900H 181,7 Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 182,2 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 185,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode) 199,6 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H 212,8 Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H 217,1 Ryzen 7 4800H 228,0 Ryzen 7 3700X 233,0 Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK 237,3 Core i7 10750H 258,1 Ryzen 7 2700X 264,8 i7 10870H 275,7 i5-10600K 301,7 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode) 377,1 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – i7-1355U 451,3 0 496
Blender Gooseberry Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje) Core i7-14700K 317,8 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX 474,3 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H 713,5 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode) 784,0 Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX 842,6 Asus ROG Strix G16 – i7-13650HX 901,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H 946,9 Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H 949,9 Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS 1.158,1 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Performance mode) 1.195,5 Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H 1.450,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode) 1.559,5 0 1.715
U Blenderu smo napravili testove samo u Standard modu i vidimo kako je procesor moćniji od konkurentnog i7-13650HX-a koji podržava ukupno 20 threadova.
Handbrake
Handbrake (FPS) Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – i9-14900HX 88,8 Core i7-14700K 79,5 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – Core Ultra 9 185H 69,4 Gigabyte G6X – i7-13650HX 59,2 Acer Swift X 14 – Core Ultra 7 155H 58,2 Asus Zenbook S 16 – Ryzen 9 AI HX 370 (Standard mode) 53,8 Gigabyte G5 MF5 (2024) – i7-13620H 50,9 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – Core Ultra 7 155H (Default Standard mode) 48,7 Asus Zenbook Duo – Core Ultra 9 185H 46,2 0 98
U Handbrakeu je opet nešto malo sporiji od Core Ultra 7 155H.
SSD performanse
Čitanje
ATTO Disk Benchmark 512K Samsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 16 12.400,0 SKHynix P41 2TB 6.640,0 Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift X 14 6.620,0 Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB 6.533,0 Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB – G6X 6.530,0 Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB 6.500,0 Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 14 6.210,0 Samsung PM9A1 2TB 6.030,0 Micron 3400 1TB – Zenbook S 13 OLED 5.930,0 Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 17 4.950,0 Micron 2400 1 TB – ZenBook S 16 4.740,0 Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G16 4.600,0 WDC PC SN560 1TB – Zenbook 14 OLED 4.380,0 Micron 2450 1TB 3.440,0 Toshiba 1TB 3.340,0 SKHynix PC711 1TB 3.200,0 WDC SN730 1TB 2.970,0 SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G7 2.950,0 Kingston OM8PCP3512F 2.920,0 SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 15 2.920,0 Toshiba XG6 512GB 2.900,0 Samsung PM991a 512 GB 2.810,0 Gigabyte SSD 512GB 2.750,0 Samsung PM981a 1TB 2.730,0 Kioxia XG6 1TB 2.710,0 Samsung 960 Evo 1TB 2.473,4 Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G3 2.350,0 Toshiba BG4 256 GB 2.220,0 Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 3500 2.210,0 Kioxia BG4 512GB 2.170,0 SK Hynix PC401 512GB 2.080,0 Toshiba BG3 512GB 1.521,9 WDC PC SN520 @ G3 1.480,1 WDC PC SN520 256 GB 1.440,0 Toshiba BG3 256GB 1.370,0 Toshiba BG3 512GB 1.340,0 Toshiba BG3 256GB 1.340,0 Toshiba BG3 512GB 1.210,0 Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G 1.040,2 SK Hynix SC311 256GB 741,6 Toshiba MQ04ABF100 563,7 ST1000LM035 120,0 WDC WD10SPZX @ G3 104,4 102,0 0 13.640
Zapis
ATTO Disk Benchmark 512K Samsung PM9A1 RAID 0 – Neo 16 9.720,0 SKHynix P41 2TB 5.940,0 Gigabyte AG470S 1 TB 5.221,0 Samsung PM9A1a 1TB – Swift X 14 4.820,0 Samsung PM9A1 2TB 4.770,0 Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB 4.640,0 Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 17 4.620,0 Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 14 4.610,0 Gigabyte AG450E 1 TB – G6X 4.600,0 Micron 2450 1TB 4.600,0 SKHynix PC711 1TB 3.950,0 Micron 2400 1 TB – ZenBook S 16 3.420,0 Micron 2400 1 TB – Strix G16 3.380,0 WDC SN730 1TB 3.210,0 WDC PC SN560 1TB – Zenbook 14 OLED 3.080,0 Samsung PM981a 1TB 2.830,0 Toshiba 1TB 2.810,0 Gigabyte SSD 512GB 2.460,0 SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 15 2.350,0 Samsung 960 Evo 1TB 2.280,0 SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G7 2.210,0 Kioxia XG6 1TB 1.690,0 Samsung PM991a 512 GB 1.600,0 Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G3 1.480,0 WDC PC SN520 @ G3 1.460,0 WDC PC SN520 256 GB 1.370,0 Kioxia BG4 512GB 1.340,0 Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 3500 1.330,0 Toshiba BG3 256GB 1.310,0 Toshiba BG4 256 GB 1.210,0 Kingston OM8PCP3512F 1.080,0 Toshiba BG3 256GB 932,7 SK Hynix PC401 512GB 690,0 Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G 636,1 SK Hynix SC311 256GB 540,0 Toshiba BG3 512GB 349,5 Toshiba MQ04ABF100 344,0 WDC WD10SPZX @ G3 102,0 ST1000LM035 96,6 85,9 0 10.692
Micronov 2400 SSD nije najbrži u ponudi, no i unatoč mrvicu slabijim performansama to se ne osjeti u svakodnevnom radu.
Memorijske performanse
AIDA Memory
AIDA Memory – Read Asus ZenBook S 16 – 32GB DDR5-7500 88.288,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-7500 85.641,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-5600 84.544,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-7500 84.173,0 Asus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-7500 82.439,0 ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 67.783,0 Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-4800 67.756,0 Gigabyte G6X – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 67.240,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 64.865,0 Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.800 63.180,0 Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-5600 61.175,0 Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-4800 59.126,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-4800 51.666,0 Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 47.154,0 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR5 46.644,0 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 45.936,0 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 42.504,0 Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.000 41.081,0 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.933 38.979,0 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.933 38.898,0 Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.993 38.500,0 Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 37.827,0 Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 37.721,0 Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 2933 37.280,0 Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2666 35.413,0 Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 34.425,0 Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 2400 32.884,0 Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.993 32.876,0 Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.667 29.969,0 Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 2133 29.688,0 Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 2133 29.488,0 Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L 27.827,0 Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L 27.155,0 HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 2133 26.830,0 Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 3200 24.509,0 Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L 24.290,0 Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L 23.120,0 Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L 21.151,0 Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L 19.772,0 Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L 18.210,0 Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L 17.787,0 Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L 17.639,0 Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L 15.292,0 0 97.117
AIDA Memory – Write Asus ZenBook S 16 – 32GB DDR5-7500 101.490,0 Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-5600 77.484,0 Asus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-7500 76.044,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-7500 74.750,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-7500 74.709,0 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR5 74.078,0 Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.800 71.123,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-5600 66.366,0 Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-4800 60.204,0 Gigabyte G6X – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 60.053,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 60.052,0 ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 59.499,0 Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-4800 57.583,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-4800 55.150,0 Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 45.592,0 Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.000 44.859,0 Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 2933 44.706,0 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 42.098,0 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.933 40.291,0 Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.993 39.635,0 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.933 39.627,0 Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 37.798,0 Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2666 37.621,0 Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 37.124,0 Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 2400 34.834,0 Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 34.035,0 Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.667 33.310,0 Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.993 32.951,0 Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 2133 31.835,0 Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L 31.531,0 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 31.460,0 Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 2133 31.017,0 HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 2133 28.479,0 Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L 26.818,0 Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L 24.970,0 Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L 24.893,0 Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 3200 23.107,0 Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L 19.776,0 Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L 17.929,0 Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L 17.815,0 Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L 17.759,0 Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L 17.439,0 Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L 14.544,0 0 111.639
AIDA Memory – copy Asus Zenbook Duo – 32 GB LPDDR5-7500 93.482,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 32 GB LPDDR5-7500 92.463,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 16GB DDR5-7500 88.667,0 Asus ZenBook S 16 – 32GB DDR5-7500 82.281,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 2x 16GB DDR5-5600 77.918,0 Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.800 64.509,0 Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-5600 61.611,0 ASUS ROG Strix G16 – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 60.167,0 Gigabyte G6X – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 59.454,0 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 16GB LPDDR5 59.159,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 2x8GB DDR5-4800 58.908,0 Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-4800 58.746,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-4800 51.082,0 Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-4800 48.811,0 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 41.091,0 Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.000 40.090,0 Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 40.025,0 Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 2933 38.128,0 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.200 36.926,0 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.933 35.188,0 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.933 34.508,0 Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.993 33.186,0 Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2666 32.709,0 Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 32.163,0 Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 31.871,0 Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.667 31.333,0 Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 2400 30.654,0 Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 2133 29.712,0 Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.993 29.405,0 Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 2133 28.446,0 Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.667 27.379,0 Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L 27.082,0 Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L 26.430,0 HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 2133 25.618,0 Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L 24.606,0 Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L 24.296,0 Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 3200 22.232,0 Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L 20.839,0 Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L 19.047,0 Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L 17.016,0 Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L 16.863,0 Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L 16.798,0 Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L 15.220,0 0 102.830
Memorijske performanse su solidne za DDR5-4800 specifikaciju.
Autonomija
4K@30fps playback Dell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh 875,0 Asus Zenbook 14 OLED – 75 Wh 846,0 Asus ZenBook S 16 – 78 Wh 641,0 Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh 634,0 Asus Zenbook Duo – 75 Wh 612,0 Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED – 63 Wh 557,0 Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh 518,0 Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh 470,0 Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh 465,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 – 90 Wh 436,0 Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63Wh 435,0 Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh 409,0 Gigabyte Aorus 17 – 99 Wh 396,0 Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 90 Wh 390,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76 Wh 390,0 Acer Swift X 14 – 76Wh 389,0 Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh 375,0 Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh 374,0 Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh 367,0 Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh 359,0 Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh 346,0 Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh 345,0 Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh 332,0 Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh 323,0 Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh 318,0 Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh 312,0 Razer Blade 14 – 68 Wh 302,0 Gigabyte G5 MF5 – 54 Wh 295,0 Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh 274,0 Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh 272,0 G531GU – 67 Wh 256,0 G3 3590 – 51 Wh 255,0 G5 5590 – 60 Wh 239,0 Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh 237,0 Asus ROG Strix G16 – 90 Wh 232,0 Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 – 90Wh 229,0 Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh 221,0 Gigabyte G6X – 73Wh 217,0 Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh 184,0 0 963
Baterija kapaciteta od 78 Wh osigurava odličnu autonomiju od gotovo 11 sati u playbacku 4K materijala. To znači da uredskog posla može odraditi još više. Pohvalno je i što unutar MyAsus aplikacije možete uključiti i Battery Care Mode koja ograničava punjenje do 80%.
Zagrijavanje i buka
Standard mod
Full-Speed mod
Kao što smo već ranije naglasili, prijenosnik smo testirali u tvorničkom Standard modu i u njemu su ventilatori iznimno tihi, a zagrijavanje radne površine, tj. tipkovnice je dosta visoko. Ako poželite više performanse dva su moda – Performance i Full-speed. U potonjem buka nešto naraste no nije iznimno bučno pa se i dalje može raditi uz njega dok ne završite taj intenzivni posao koji ste započeli. Ujedno, tada je i radna površina nešto hladnija. Preporuka je ipak držati ga u Standard modu gdje je gotovo pa nečujan. Ako želite još nižu potrošnju energije i buke, tada je Whisper mod za vas.