Brzi test – Dell XPS 17 9710

· · Mobilno · Stranica 2 od 3

Rezultati testova

UL Benchmarks PCMark 10Asus ROG Zephyrus S177.253,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE7.185,0Dell XPS 17 97106.342,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC6.280,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC6.032,0Dell G7 77005.795,0Asus TUF Gaming A155.541,0Dell Precision 75305.203,0Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H)5.181,0Dell G5 55905.135,0Asus G531GU5.064,0Dell XPS 15 95005.037,0Asus ZenBook Duo 144.948,0Dell XPS 17 97004.909,0Dell G7 77904.894,0Dell Vostro 35004.605,0Asus UX580GE4.330,0Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H)4.309,0Dell Latitude 55004.306,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H)4.256,0Dell Vostro 35804.167,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H)4.132,0Dell Inspiron 73863.969,0Dell Latitude 95103.963,0Dell XPS 13 93803.889,0Dell Latitude 74903.562,0Dell XPS 13 93652.192,007.978 XPS je ovdje postigao sasvim respektabilan rezultat. 3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ8.068,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.867,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ7.242,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ6.975,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0011.993 3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 30806.698,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M5.515,0Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.700,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.017,007.368 RTX 3060 u ovom prijenosniku pokazuje malo slabije performanse, što je posljedica drugačijeg rashladnog sustava i nižih taktova. Igre

 

Testirali smo dvije igre, a prva je Dirt 5. Na oba screenshota vidimo rezultat dobiven na rezoluciji 1.920 x 1.200 na kojoj se i najbolje igrati na ovom prijenosniku, a u prvom slučaju je RayTracing bio isključen, dok je u drugom bio uključen. Jasno, RXT 3060 sa 6 GB memorije nije izrazito moćna kartica za igru s Ray Tracingom, pa je bolje ne uključivati ga. Sve ostale grafičke postavke su bile na maksimumu.

 

  Horizon Zero Dawn smo testirali u dvije rezolucije – 1.920 x 1.200 i 2.560 x 1.440, te je i ovdje lako za zaključiti da je niža rezolucija bolji izbor. I ovdje su nam grafičke postavke bile na maksimumu. CPU performanse i usporedba s ostalim mobilnim procesorima Cinebench 20 Multicore CPUAsus ROG Zephyrus S17 – Core i9-11900H5.435,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ryzen 9 5900HX5.379,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – i7-11800H4.380,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – Ryzen 7 4800H3.931,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – i7 10870H3.625,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7 10870H3.424,0Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H3.315,0Dell G7 7790 – i9 9880H3.054,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 10750H2.928,0Asus G531GU – i7 9750H2.648,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – i7 10750H2.634,0Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H2.560,0Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8750H2.550,0Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H2.515,0Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK2.044,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – i7 1165G72.020,0Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H1.766,0Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 8665U1.505,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-1065G71.454,0Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165G71.445,0Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10810U1.439,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 8665U1.347,0Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U1.293,0Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U1.257,005.979 Core i9-11900H i AMD-ov Ryzen 9 5900HX su na vrhu poretka, a i7-11800H ih odmah slijedi. Procesor ima više no dovoljno snage za naprednije zadaće poput obrade videa, fotografija itd. SSD performanse Čitanje ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 2TB6.030,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.200,0WDC SN730 1TB2.970,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920,0Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730,0Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35002.210,0Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,2SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,6Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,7ST1000LM035120,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,4102,006.633 Zapis ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KSamsung PM9A1 2TB4.770,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.080,0WDC SN730 1TB2.830,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.350,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.280,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.210,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G71.690,0Kioxia XG6 1TB1.600,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.480,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.460,0WDC PC SN520 @ G31.370,0WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.340,0Kioxia BG4 512GB1.330,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35001.310,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.210,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.080,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F932,7Toshiba BG3 256GB690,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB636,1Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G540,0SK Hynix SC311 256GB349,5Toshiba BG3 512GB344,0Toshiba MQ04ABF100102,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G396,6ST1000LM03585,905.247 SSD je primjereno brz ovakvom tipu prijenosnika. Autonomija 4K@30fps playbackDell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh634,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465,0Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh346,0Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh345,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh332,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh323,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh318,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh312,0Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh274,0Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh272,0Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh256,0G531GU – 67 Wh255,0G3 3590 – 51 Wh239,0G5 5590 – 60 Wh237,0Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh221,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh205,0195,00963 Autonomija nije sjajna no nismo ni očekivali više od ovako moćne kombinacije hardvera i velikog svijetlog ekrana. Ipak, ako smanjimo svjetlinu i bavimo se pretežno tipkanjem u Wordu, surfanjem i sličnim zadacima, autonomiju možemo protegnuti i do cijelog radnog dana. Zagrijavanje, buka i taktovi

 

Maksimalni boost takt procesora u ovom prijenosniku je oko 4,6 GHz no temperatura brzo skoči do 100°C kada slijedi spuštanje takta na oko 3,5 GHz koje održava duže vrijeme a da pri tom temperatura ne prelazi 90°C. Pri tom rashladni sustav proizvodi 45,4 dB(A) buke na oko 30 centimetara od prijenosnika. To je čujno, no nije i izraženo bučno. Posljedica moćnog procesora i iste takve grafičke kartice je i iznimno veliko zagrijavanje gornjeg dijela tipkovnice koji “kipi” na preko 62°C. Ovo svakako nije dobro, pa bi Dell morao poraditi malo na hlađenju.