Rezultati testova
Zagrijavanje i buka
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X @ Stock Cinebench R23 nT loop
Temperature (Tdie) Endorfy Navis F360 94,9 ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 X. 96,3 Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE 96,6 Noctua NH-L9a-AM5 96,8 DeepCool AK500 97,1 ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB 97,5 ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic 97,6 CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB 98,5 DeepCool AS500 Plus 98,5 0 108
Temperature modernih procesora su kao što znamo visoke jer ih ploče tjeraju do maksimuma (slično kao kod laptopa), pa na ovaj rezultat ne treba ni obraćati pažnju previše. Bitno je da nema pada takta i performansi što se u ovom slučaju ne dešava.
Buka
Noise (dBA) ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB 37,0 DeepCool AK500 39,3 Endorfy Navis F360 39,5 DeepCool AS500 Plus 39,9 Noctua NH-L9a-AM5 41,5 ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT 45,3 ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic 45,4 CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB 46,7 Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE 54,6 0 60
Ventilatori se poprilično čuju i buka je nešto izraženija. Nije iznimno glasna što bi bilo preko 50 dBA, ali ni zadovoljavajuće tiha što je sve ispod 40 dBA. Nekakva čujna zlatna sredina.
Performanse
3DMark CPU profile CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB 9.090,0 ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB 9.070,0 ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic 9.065,0 Endorfy Navis F360 9.061,0 Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE 9.058,0 ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT 9.011,0 DeepCool AK500 8.970,0 Noctua NH-L9a-AM5 8.818,0 DeepCool AS500 Plus 8.698,0 0 9.999
Cinebench 23 nT Endorfy Navis F360 19.517,0 Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE 19.459,0 ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic 19.437,0 ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB 19.342,0 ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT 19.325,0 CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB 19.275,0 DeepCool AK500 18.944,0 Noctua NH-L9a-AM5 18.755,0 DeepCool AS500 Plus 18.649,0 0 21.469
Cinebench 23 1T Endorfy Navis F360 1.979,0 ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT 1.979,0 ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic 1.967,0 DeepCool AK500 1.963,0 ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB 1.958,0 DeepCool AS500 Plus 1.957,0 Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE 1.951,0 CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB 1.902,0 Noctua NH-L9a-AM5 1.808,0 0 2.177
Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje) CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB 71,0 Endorfy Navis F360 71,0 Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE 72,0 ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT 72,0 ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB 72,0 ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic 72,0 DeepCool AK500 73,0 DeepCool AS500 Plus 73,0 Noctua NH-L9a-AM5 75,0 0 83
Handbrake Endorfy Navis F360 65,2 CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB 64,6 DeepCool AS500 Plus 64,5 ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic 64,4 ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT 64,3 Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE 64,2 ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB 64,1 DeepCool AK500 63,6 Noctua NH-L9a-AM5 62,1 0 72
V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples) Endorfy Navis F360 22.417,0 CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB 22.392,0 ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic 22.159,0 ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT 22.150,0 Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE 22.117,0 ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB 21.834,0 DeepCool AS500 Plus 21.818,0 DeepCool AK500 21.559,0 Noctua NH-L9a-AM5 21.251,0 0 24.659
Ukupno gledano, osim 1T performansi u Cinebenchu, ML240L je pokazao solidne performanse i dobro se upario s Ryzenom 7700X. Ovakvi osnovni 240-milimetarski hladnjaci su i namijenjeni srednjem tržišnom razredu i zapravo nemaju kapacitet za procesore koji su na vrhu desktop segmenta.