Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Mobilno · Stranica 3 od 4

Rezultati testova

Sintetika

PCMark 10

PCMark 10Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY)12.618,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G147.660,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S177.253,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE7.185,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 177.176,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF7.062,0Dell XPS 17 97106.342,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC6.280,0Dell XPS 15 95206.273,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC6.032,0Dell G7 77005.795,0Asus TUF Gaming A155.541,0Dell Precision 75305.203,0Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H)5.181,0Dell G5 55905.135,0Asus G531GU5.064,0Dell XPS 15 95005.037,0Asus ZenBook Duo 144.948,0Dell XPS 17 97004.909,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED4.894,0Dell G7 77904.768,0Dell Vostro 35004.605,0Asus UX580GE4.330,0Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H)4.309,0Dell Latitude 55004.306,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H)4.256,0Dell Vostro 35804.167,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H)4.132,0Dell Inspiron 73863.969,0Dell Latitude 95103.963,0Dell XPS 13 93803.889,0Dell Latitude 74903.562,0Dell XPS 13 93652.192,0013.880

Sasvim solidne performanse za ovaj prijenosnik koji nudi fino uglađen hardver srednje klase.

3DMark Time Spy

3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 409020.355,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 406010.815,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 308010.240,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S8.861,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ8.068,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.867,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ7.242,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ6.975,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti4.793,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe1.835,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0022.391

Time Spy performanse pokazuju kako je RTX 4060 mrvicu jača od RTX 3080 – izvrsno!

3DMark Port Royal

3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 409013.080,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 30806.698,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 30806.328,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 40605.882,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M5.515,0Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.700,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.017,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX6800S3.923,0014.388

Ray tracing performanse u Port Royal testu pokazuju ipak malo niži nivo od RTX 3080, ali to je i dalje impresivno.

3DMark Speed Way

3DMark Speed WayAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 40905.358,0Gigabyte RTX 4070 Ti Gaming OC5.156,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 40602.064,0AMD Radeon RX 76001.959,005.894

Speed Way test koristi novu tehniku Mesh Shadera koja dolazi u DirectX 12 Ultimate setu, tj. koristi mesh shadere za optimizaciju LOD-a (Level of Detail) za svaki skup u mreži. Ovdje nemamo drugih mobilnih kartica za usporedbu, no vidimo da je mobilna RTX 4060 brža od desktop RX 7600 – odlično.

Performanse u igrama

Company of Heroes 3

Company of Heroes 3 (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17128,8Sapphire RX 7600 Pulse OC127,20142

Ponovno vidimo da performanse RTX 4060 kartice možemo komotno uspoređivati s RX 7600 desktop karticom što je impresivno za jedan mobilni GPU koji ima upola niži maksimalni TDP.

Horizon Zero Dawn

Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 1920 x 1080)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17176,0Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17106,0Nvidia RTX 3080 @ SCAR 1797,0Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G1593,0AMD Radeon RX 6800S @ Zephyrus G1492,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aorus 15G KC76,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aero 15 KC73,0RTX 2070 Super63,0GTX1650 Ti31,00194

The Riftbreaker

The Riftbreaker Ray Tracing (1920 x 1080)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17357,0AMD Radeon RX 6800S @ Zephyrus G14274,0Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G15234,2Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17197,1Nvidia RTX 3080 @ SCAR 17195,90393

Performanse u ove dvije igre, jedna bez Ray Tracinga i druga sa, pokazuju da na 1080p RTX 4060 ima snage jednako kao i RTX 3080 što je stvarno impresivno.

The Calisto Protocol

The Calisto Protocol (1920 x 1080)RTX 4060 @ Default71,0RTX 4060 @ DXR + FSR Performance69,0RTX 4060 @ DXR + FSR Balanced66,9RTX 4060 @ DXR + FSR Quality64,8RTX 4060 @ DXR52,4078

Performanse bez uključenog Ray Tracinga su sasvim solidne, a ne padaju ispod razine igrivog ni kada ga uključimo. Ovdje smo koristili i FSR, tehnologiju koj radi i na Nvidijinim karticama kako bi ubrzali performanse s uključenim Ray Tracingom a rezultate možete vidjeti. Preporuka je koristiti Quality ili Balanced. Isto tako, kod igara koje podržavaju DLSS ne treba previše smanjivati kvalitetu slike.

CPU Performanse

Cinebench R20

Cinebench 20 Multicore CPUAsus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX12.469,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H6.280,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – Core i9-11900H5.435,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ryzen 9 5900HX5.379,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – Ryzen 9 5900HX5.256,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK5.187,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS4.800,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – Ryzen 7 4800H3.931,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – i7 10870H3.625,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7 10870H3.424,0Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H3.315,0Dell G7 7790 – i9 9880H3.054,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 10750H2.928,0Asus G531GU – i7 9750H2.648,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – i7 10750H2.634,0Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H2.560,0Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8750H2.550,0Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H2.515,0Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK2.044,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – i7 1165G72.020,0Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H1.766,0Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 8665U1.505,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-1065G71.454,0Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165G71.445,0Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10810U1.439,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 8665U1.347,0Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U1.293,0Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U1.257,0013.716 Cinebench 23 Multicore CPURyzen 9 7950X37.776,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX32.274,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H15.962,0Ryzen 5 7600X15.409,0041.554

Performanse procesora su odlične, kao što vidimo brže su od svih ostalih mobilnih koje smo do sada testirali osim monstruma 7945HX.

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzn 9 7945HX77,7Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H154,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Ryzen 9 5900HX176,7Core i9-11900H181,7Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17182,2AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus ROG Zephyrus G14185,0Ryzen 7 4800H228,0Ryzen 7 3700X233,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK237,3Core i7 10750H258,1Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7 10870H275,7i5-10600K301,70332 Blender Gooseberry (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 7 7700X527,3Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H790,60870

I u ovom testu i7 13700H prikazuje visoke performanse, te da je odličan izbor za jedan gaming prijenosnik. Gooseberry benchmark pokazuje performanse na duži vremenski rok koje su i dalje impresivne za jedan mobilni procesor. U budućim testovima ćemo vidjeti kako se nosi s ostalim mobilnim procesorima.

Memorijske performanse 

AIDA Memory

AIDA Memory – ReadGigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480067.240,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80063.180,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480059.126,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.666,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20046.644,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.936,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.504,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00041.081,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.979,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.898,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99338.500,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.827,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.721,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293337.280,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266635.413,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.425,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240032.884,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.876,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66729.969,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213329.688,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.488,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.827,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L27.155,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213326.830,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320024.509,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.290,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L23.120,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L21.151,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L19.772,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L18.210,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.787,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.639,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.292,0073.964 AIDA Memory – WriteAsus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80066.366,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480060.204,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480057.583,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480055.150,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.592,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00044.859,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293344.706,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.098,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93340.291,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99339.635,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93339.627,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.798,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266637.621,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.124,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240034.834,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.035,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66733.310,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.951,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213331.835,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L31.531,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20031.460,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213331.017,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213328.479,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L26.818,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L24.970,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.893,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320023.107,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L19.776,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.929,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.815,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L17.759,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.439,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L14.544,0073.003 AIDA Memory – copyAsus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80064.509,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480058.908,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.082,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480048.811,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20041.091,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00040.090,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20040.025,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293338.128,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20036.926,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93335.188,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93334.508,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99333.186,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266632.709,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66732.163,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.871,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.333,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240030.654,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.712,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99329.405,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213328.446,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66727.379,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.082,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L26.430,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213325.618,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.606,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.296,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320022.232,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L20.839,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L19.047,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.016,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.863,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.798,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.220,0070.960

Sirove performanse memorijskog podsustava nisu baš toliko impresivne. Ok, brojke su pri samom vrhun naših grafikona, no imali smo i laptope koji se tu bolje drže.

SSD performanse

Čitanje

ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KGigabyte AG470S 1 TB6.533,0Gigabyte Samsung PM9A1 2TB6.030,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.950,0Micron 2450 1TB3.440,0Toshiba 1TB3.340,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.200,0WDC SN730 1TB2.970,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920,0Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730,0Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35002.210,0Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,2SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,6Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,7ST1000LM035120,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,4102,007.186

Zapis

ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KGigabyte AG470S 1 TB5.221,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB4.770,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.610,0Micron 2450 1TB3.950,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.080,0WDC SN730 1TB2.830,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.810,0Toshiba 1TB2.460,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.350,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.280,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.210,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G71.690,0Kioxia XG6 1TB1.600,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.480,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.460,0WDC PC SN520 @ G31.370,0WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.340,0Kioxia BG4 512GB1.330,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35001.310,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.210,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.080,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F932,7Toshiba BG3 256GB690,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB636,1Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G540,0SK Hynix SC311 256GB349,5Toshiba BG3 512GB344,0Toshiba MQ04ABF100102,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G396,6ST1000LM03585,905.743

Gigabyteov AG470S SSD s PCIe Gen 4 sučeljem i Phison PS5018-E18 kontrolerom je iznimno brz i to ATTO testovi i pokazuju. Uz to, postigao je i vrlo visok rezultat na PCMark 10 HDD testu – 3.076 (496,50 MB/s; 55 μs pristupno vrijeme).

Autonomija

4K@30fps playbackDell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh634,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63Wh435,0Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – 99 Wh396,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 90 Wh390,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76 Wh390,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh359,0Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh346,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh345,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh332,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh323,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh318,0Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh312,0Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh274,0Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh272,0G531GU – 67 Wh256,0G3 3590 – 51 Wh255,0G5 5590 – 60 Wh239,0Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh237,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh221,0Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh184,00963

Baterija visokog kapaciteta od 99 Wh osigurava vrlo dobru autonomiju za ovaj veliki i moćan prijenosnik u slučaju reprodukcije multimedijskog sadržaja. Ako se poželite igrati na bateriji morate znati da će performanse pasti, a i ona će se jako brzo isprazniti. Stoga, gejmajte samo priključeni na napajanje. Baterija podržava brzo punjenje, pa je do polovice kapaciteta moguće dopuniti u roku od 30 minuta.

POVEZANI ČLANCI