Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master X & Intel Core i9 14900K recenzija

· · MBO i RAM · Stranica 5 od 8

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL test

PCMark 10Core i9-13900K10.646,0Core i9-14900K10.081,0011.711

Prvi sintetički test i već flop za 14900K. Moramo napomenuti da su oba procesora testirana u isto vrijeme i naravno na istoj platformi i u istim uvjetima. Valjda Master X bolje zna što bi s 13900K nego s 14900K. Idemo dalje.

3DMark CPU profileRyzen 9 7950X16.956,0Core i9-13900K16.373,0Core i9-14900K16.362,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D15.118,0Ryzen 9 7900X13.296,0Ryzen 9 5950X12.119,0Core i9-12900K12.034,0Ryzen 7 5800X11.985,0Ryzen 7 7700X9.058,0Core i5-12600K8.235,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D8.060,0Ryzen 7 5700X7.867,0Ryzen 5 7600X7.429,0Ryzen 5 5600X5.390,0Core i3-12100F4.078,0018.652

Ovdje je razlika minimalna, no stvarno nam već sada nije jasno zašto 14900K ne uspijeva biti iznad 13900K.

CPU testovi

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-14900K59,9Core i9-13900K62,8Ryzen 9 7950X64,1Ryzen 9 7950X3D67,3Ryzen 9 7900X81,6Core i9-12900K88,7Ryzen 9 5950X116,5Ryzen 9 3950X121,8Ryzen 7 7700X123,9Ryzen 7 7800X3D127,2Core i5-12600K139,7Ryzen 9 5900X143,1Ryzen 5 7600X155,6Ryzen 9 3900XT156,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Core i9-10850K172,3Ryzen 7 5700X188,4Ryzen 7 5800X201,4Ryzen 7 3800XT202,4Core i7-10700K218,4Ryzen R7 3700X233,0Ryzen 7 2700X264,8Ryzen 5 5600X271,9i7-8700K283,4Core i3-12100F285,9Ryzen 7 1800X299,6Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K301,7Ryzen 5 3600X313,0Core i5-10400343,0Ryzen 5 2600X344,8i7-7800X355,1Core i5-10500357,5Ryzen 5 2600366,7i5-8600K406,60447 Blender Gooseberry benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 7950X266,2Ryzen 9 7950X3D276,8Core i9-13900K290,4Core i9-14900K292,9Ryzen 7 7800X3D527,3Ryzen 7 7700X527,30580

Ovdje ipak blago vodstvo, no samo u prvom testu. U drugom, onom koji duže traje je 14900K jednostavno malo sporiji.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 23 nTCore i9-14900K39.314,0Intel i9-13900K39.223,0Ryzen 9 7950X37.776,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D35.139,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0Core i9-12900K27.259,0Ryzen 9 5950X23.653,0Ryzen 7 7700X19.459,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D18.381,0Core i5-12600K17.491,0Ryzen 5 7600X15.409,0Ryzen 7 5800X15.349,0Core i9-10850K15.175,0Ryzen 7 5700X12.652,0Ryzen 5 5600X10.218,0Core i3-12100F8.490,0043.245 Cinebench 23 1TCore i9-14900K2.306,0Intel i9-13900K2.246,0Ryzen 9 7950X2.030,0Ryzen 9 7900X2.015,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D2.002,0Core i9-12900K1.988,0Ryzen 5 7600X1.954,0Ryzen 7 7700X1.951,0Core i5-12600K1.861,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D1.820,0Ryzen 7 5800X1.596,0Ryzen 9 5950X1.583,0Core i3-12100F1.582,0Ryzen 5 5600X1.529,0Ryzen 7 5700X1.443,0Core i9-10850K1.278,002.537

U Cinebenchu je 14900K ipak nešto brži i to postotno više u 1T testu nego u nT testu.

Corona 1.3

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-13900K36,0Core i9-14900K36,0Ryzen 9 7950X36,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D37,0Ryzen 9 5950X47,0Ryzen 9 7900X47,0Ryzen 9 5900X58,0Core i9-12900K59,0Ryzen 9 3950X61,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D71,0Ryzen 7 7700X72,0Ryzen 9 3900X72,0Ryzen 9 3900XT72,0Core i9-10850K76,0Core i5-12600K90,0Ryzen 5 7600X91,0Ryzen 7 5800X92,0Core i7-10700K96,0Ryzen 7 5700X101,0Ryzen 7 3800XT104,0Ryzen 7 3700X112,0Ryzen 7 2700X118,0Ryzen 5 5600X123,0Core i5-10600K134,0Core i7-8700K141,0Ryzen 5 3600X144,0Core i5-10500146,0Core i5-10400148,0Core i3-12100F172,0Ryzen 3 3300X202,0Ryzen 3 3100233,00256

U ovom su testu izjednačeni.

Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p

HandbrakeCore i9-13900K89,9Core i9-14900K83,0Ryzen 9 7950X82,1Ryzen 9 7950X3D79,9Ryzen 9 7900X77,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D74,4Ryzen 7 7700X64,2Ryzen 9 5950X57,2Ryzen 5 7600X57,0Ryzen 7 5800X49,4Core i9-10850K49,2Ryzen 7 5700X43,9Ryzen 5 5600X38,6Core i9-12900K35,3Core i3-12100F32,3Core i5-12600K18,4099

Transkodiranje ide bolje za 13900K, tj. ponavlja se ista priča, ploča više performansi izvlači iz njega. Možda je jednostavno do hladnjaka, trebamo još moćniji sistem za više performanse.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)Ryzen 9 7950X42.556,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D41.732,0Core i9-13900K41.715,0Ryzen 9 7900X39.819,0Core i9-14900K38.968,0Core i9-12900K27.559,0Ryzen 9 5950X27.384,0Ryzen 7 7700X22.117,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D22.050,0Ryzen 5 7600X17.582,0Core i5-12600K17.516,0Ryzen 7 5800X17.040,0Core i9-10850K16.808,0Ryzen 7 5700X14.436,0Ryzen 5 5600X11.589,0Core i3-12100F9.400,0046.812

Ovdje je zaostatak pak znatniji. 14900K jednostavno ne uspijeva izvući maksimum na ovoj ploči ili s ovim hlađenjem.

Overclocking (Instant 6GHz+)

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-14900K @ OC59,0Core i9-14900K59,9066 Blender Gooseberry benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-14900K @ OC290,8Core i9-14900K292,90322

Overclcking, tj. najbolja opcija za automatski OC pokazuje lagana ubrzanja performansi na oba Blender testa.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 23 nTCore i9-14900K @ OC40.032,0Core i9-14900K39.314,0044.035 Cinebench 23 1TCore i9-14900K @ OC2.406,0Core i9-14900K2.306,002.647

Konačno ovdje 14900K pokazuje zube i svoj pravi potencijal.

Corona 1.3

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-14900K @ OC35,0Core i9-14900K36,0040

Lagano ubrzanje za 14900K.

Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p

HandbrakeCore i9-14900K @ OC85,3Core i9-14900K83,0094

Ubrzanje je i ovdje vidljivo, no nije dovoljno da dosegne rezultat koji je ostvario 13900K.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)Core i9-14900K @ OC39.560,0Core i9-14900K38.968,0043.516

I ovdje vidimo određeno ubrzanje, no ništa spektakularno.