Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master X & Intel Core i9 14900K recenzija

· · MBO i RAM · Stranica 7 od 8

Rezultati testiranja – treći dio

Memorijske performanse @ 6.800 MHz CL30

AIDA64 RAM ReadCore i9-14900K95.379,0Core i9-13900K95.114,0Core i9-12900K95.073,0Core i5-12600K88.940,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D77.987,0Ryzen 9 7900X75.442,0Ryzen 9 7950X75.360,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D59.421,0Ryzen 7 7700X58.999,0Ryzen 5 7600X58.974,00104.917 AIDA64 RAM WriteCore i9-13900K84.401,0Core i9-14900KCore i9-12900K83.940,0Core i5-12600K83.870,0Ryzen 5 7600X82.814,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D81.060,0Ryzen 7 7700X80.877,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D80.517,0Ryzen 9 7900X79.490,0Ryzen 9 7950X77.679,076.801,0092.841 AIDA64 RAM CopyCore i9-13900K86.939,0Core i9-14900KCore i9-12900K86.606,0Core i5-12600K84.316,0Ryzen 9 7900X81.198,0Ryzen 9 7950X69.836,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D69.658,0Ryzen 5 7600X69.119,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D59.990,0Ryzen 7 7700X59.922,059.847,0095.633 AIDA64 RAM LatencyRyzen 9 7950X64,8Ryzen 9 7900X65,3Ryzen 7 7700X65,9Ryzen 9 7950X3D68,2Ryzen 7 7800X3D68,4Core i9-12900K69,2Core i9-14900K69,3Ryzen 5 7600X70,4Core i9-13900K71,0Core i5-12600K74,0081

Samo za usporedbu, ubacili smo sporiji kit i ovdje vidimo da nema većih odstupanja od performansi ranijih modela.

Memorijske performanse @ 6.800 MHz CL30

AIDA64 RAM ReadCore i9-14900K @ instant 6GHz+103.330,0Core i9-14900K @ optimized101.450,00113.663 AIDA64 RAM WriteCore i9-14900K @ optimized89.791,0Core i9-14900K @ instant 6GHz+89.224,0098.770 AIDA64 RAM CopyCore i9-14900K @ instant 6GHz+94.474,0Core i9-14900K @ optimized93.852,00103.921 AIDA64 RAM LatencyCore i9-14900K @ instant 6GHz+66,1Core i9-14900K @ optimized67,2074

Ovdje smo pak usporedili dva PerfDrive profila i vidimo da ima određenih razlika, kao što ih je naravno bilo i kod ostatka performansi.

Potrošnja sistema

Potrošnjai5-750092,0Ryzen 3 1200105,0Ryzen 5 1400113,0i7-6700K120,0Core i5-10500124,0Core i5-10400125,0Ryzen 3 1300X125,0Ryzen 5 1500X130,0Ryzen 5 1600132,0Ryzen 7 1700137,0i7-7700K138,0Ryzen 7 5700X138,0Ryzen 7 2700141,0Ryzen 3 3100146,0Ryzen 5 2600155,0Ryzen 7 3700X160,0Ryzen 5 3600X162,0Ryzen 7 1700X162,0Ryzen 3 3300X163,0Ryzen 5 1600X163,0i5-8600K165,0Core i5-10600K167,0Ryzen 5 2600X170,0Ryzen 5 5600X172,0Ryzen 7 1800X173,0Core i7-10700K183,0Ryzen 7 5800X183,0Ryzen 7 7800X3D190,0Ryzen 7 3800XT193,0Ryzen 9 3900X195,0i7-6950X196,0i7-8700K200,0Ryzen 7 2700X201,0i7-5820K205,0Ryzen 5 7600X206,0Ryzen 9 5900X210,0Ryzen 9 3900XT211,0i7-5930K216,0i7-7800X225,0Ryzen 9 5950X230,0i5-12600K225,0Ryzen 9 3950X226,0Ryzen 7 7700X230,0Ryzen 9 7950X3D268,0i9-10850K275,0Ryzen 9 7900X305,0i9-12900K325,0Ryzen 9 7950X370,0Core i9-13900K470,0Core i9-14900K490,00539

Očekivano, potrošnja 14900K procesora je još malo veća nego 13900K, no to one inicjalne performanse ipak nisu opravdavale. Tek kada smo uključili Instant 6GHz+ profil su stvari krenule na bolje i to zanimljivo – uz isu potrošnju.

Zagrijavanje @ LT360 HPE

TemperatureRyzen 7 7800X3D87,2Ryzen 9 7950X3D90,0Ryzen 9 7950X96,0Core i9-13900K100,0Core i9-14900K100,00110

Nema se tu što previše za napisati. Ploča forsira procesor do 100°C nakon čega spušta napon i takt te zadržava najviše moguće performanse u ovisnosti o tome kakav hladnjak koristimo. Drugim riječima, čim bolje hlađenje tim više performanse.