Intel Core i5-12600K recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi w. Radeon RX 6800

PCMark 10Ryzen 9 5950X8.723,0Ryzen 5 5800X8.685,0Core i9-12900K8.644,0Ryzen 5 5600X8.221,0Core i5-12600K7.924,009.595 3DMark TimeSpyCore i9-12900K16.282,0Core i5-12600K15.594,0Ryzen 9 5950X15.164,0Ryzen 5 5800X14.881,0Ryzen 5 5600X13.755,0017.910 3DMark CPU profileRyzen 9 5950X12.119,0Core i9-12900K12.034,0Ryzen 5 5800X11.985,0Core i5-12600K8.235,0Ryzen 5 5600X5.390,0013.331

PCMark 10 mjeri općenite performanse sistema, a 3DMark nam kombinirane performanse snage procesora i grafike. Testirali smo s novom grafičkom karticom u odnosu na prijašnje testove. Umjesto RX 6900 XT smo koristili RX 6800 zbog problema koji nam se pojavio prilikom boota s jačom karticom. Naime, na Hero ploči RX 6900 XT nije htjela raditi u prvom PCIe slotu na x16 propusnosti, već samo na trećem pri x4. Stoga smo koristili slabiju karticu i sve grafičke testove napravili ispočetka.

PCMark rezultat je najslabiji za 12600K što baš i nismo očekivali, no što je tu je. S druge strane, zato je u Time Spy testu tik ispod 12900K procesora, a u CPU testu je između 5800X i 5600X proceesora.

CPU testovi

Enkripcija podataka (AIDA64)

AIDA CPU AES (MB/s)Ryzen 9 5950X248.080,0Ryzen 7 5800X149.442,0Core i9-12900K140.651,0Core i5-12600K131.035,0Ryzen 5 5600X100.756,0Core i9-10850K54.633,00272.888 AIDA CPU SHA3 (MB/s)Ryzen 9 5950X5.823,0Core i9-12900K5.144,0Core i9-10850K4.972,0Ryzen 7 5800X3.835,0Core i5-12600K3.649,0Ryzen 5 5600X2.512,006.405

Kod testova enkripcije je 12600K solidan, pa se čak u SHA3 dosta približava procesoru 5800X.

Ray-trace test (AIDA64)

AIDA FP32 (Rays/s)Ryzen 9 5950X24.925,0Core i9-10850K20.999,0Ryzen 7 5800X17.929,0Core i5-12600K17.626,0Core i9-12900K13.376,0Ryzen 5 5600X11.752,0027.418 AIDA FP64 (Rays/s)Ryzen 9 5950X12.728,0Core i9-10850K11.494,0Core i5-12600K9.666,0Ryzen 7 5800X9.602,0Core i9-12900K8.301,0Ryzen 5 5600X6.273,0014.001

Rezultati kod Ray-trace testova su ponovno solidni i usporedivi s procesorom 5800X procesorom koji ima 8C/16T konfiguraciju i nešto je skuplji.

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-12900K88,7Ryzen 9 5950X116,5Ryzen 9 3950X121,8Core i5-12600K139,7Ryzen 9 5900X143,1Ryzen 9 3900XT156,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Core i9-10850K172,3Ryzen 7 5800X201,4Ryzen 7 3800XT202,4Core i7-10700K218,4Ryzen R7 3700X233,0Ryzen 7 2700X264,8Ryzen 5 5600X271,9i7-8700K283,4Ryzen 7 1800X299,6Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K301,7Ryzen 5 3600X313,0Core i5-10400343,0Ryzen 5 2600X344,8i7-7800X355,1Core i5-10500357,5Ryzen 5 2600366,7i5-8600K406,60447

 

Odličan rezultat u Blenderu, daleko bolji od 5800X, a malo je nadmašio i puno skupljeg Ryzena 9 5900X.

Cinebench R20

Cinebench 20 nTCore i9-12900K10.409,0Ryzen 9 5950X10.035,0Ryzen 9 3950X9.265,0Ryzen 9 5900X8.380,0Ryzen 9 3900XT7.302,0Ryzen 9 3900X7.237,0Core i5-10600K6.680,0Core i9-10850K6.164,0Ryzen 7 5800X6.001,0Ryzen 7 3800XT5.123,0Core i7-10700K4.936,0Ryzen 7 3700X4.916,0Ryzen 5 5600X4.351,0Ryzen 7 2700X3.857,0Core i5-10600K3.592,0Core i7-8700K3.408,0Ryzen 5 3600X3.369,0Core i5-104003.147,0Core i5-105003.055,0Ryzen 3 3300X2.583,0Ryzen 3 31002.340,0011.450 Cinebench 20 1TCore i9-12900K744,0Core i5-10600K724,0Ryzen 9 5950X640,0Ryzen 9 5900X628,0Ryzen 7 5800X624,0Ryzen 5 5600X595,0Ryzen 9 3900XT518,0Core i7-10700K512,0Core i9-10850K507,00818

U starijem Cinebenchu vidimo usporedbu s puno procesora, a vidimo da je 12600K brži od i9-10850K procesora koji ima 10C/20T konfiguraciju – izvrsno. Isto tako, nešto je brži od Ryzena 7 5800X. Single core performanse su mu izvrsne!

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 23 nTCore i9-12900K27.259,0Ryzen 9 5950X23.653,0Core i5-12600K17.491,0Ryzen 7 5800X15.349,0Core i9-10850K15.175,0Ryzen 5 5600X10.218,0029.985 Cinebench 23 1TCore i9-12900K1.988,0Core i5-12600K1.861,0Ryzen 7 5800X1.596,0Ryzen 9 5950X1.583,0Ryzen 5 5600X1.529,0Core i9-10850K1.278,002.187

U novijem Cinebenchu je također brži od 5800X, kao i od 10850K. Single core performanse nisu na razini 12900K, no i dalje su odlične.

Corona 1.3

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 5950X47,0Ryzen 9 5900X58,0Core i9-12900K59,0Ryzen 9 3950X61,0Ryzen 9 3900X72,0Ryzen 9 3900XT72,0Core i9-10850K76,0Core i5-12600K90,0Ryzen 7 5800X92,0Core i7-10700K96,0Ryzen 7 3800XT104,0Ryzen 7 3700X112,0Ryzen 7 2700X118,0Ryzen 5 5600X123,0Core i5-10600K134,0Core i7-8700K141,0Ryzen 5 3600X144,0Core i5-10500146,0Core i5-10400148,0Ryzen 3 3300X202,0Ryzen 3 3100233,00256

U ovom testu je 12600K samo malo brži od 5800X, te sporiji od 10850K procesora.

Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p

HandbrakeRyzen 9 5950X57,2Ryzen 7 5800X49,4Core i9-10850K49,2Ryzen 5 5600X38,6Core i9-12900K35,3Core i5-12600K18,4063

Handbrake ne radi najbolje s novom Alder Lake arhitekturom pa je i rezultat dosta loš. Naravno transkodiranje video materijala možete odraditi i u nekom drugom softveru koji će bolje iskoristiti ove procesore.

JetStream 2

JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)Core i9-12900K230,4Ryzen 7 5800X204,8Ryzen 9 5950X198,7Ryzen 9 5900X195,9Ryzen 5 5600X192,4Core i9-10850K176,9Core i7-10700K161,3Ryzen 9 3900X156,0Ryzen 7 3800XT154,7Ryzen 9 3900XT152,8Ryzen 3 3300X149,6Core i5-12600K149,3Core i5-10600K148,7Core i5-10500141,5Core i7-8700K140,8Core i5-10400137,2Ryzen 3 3100127,10253

JetStream 2 je browser benchmark koji se fokusira na web aplikacije, koji kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. Veći broj znači bolje performanse, a 12600K je postigao samo prosječan rezultat u rangu s 10600K procesorom koji ima manji broj jegara.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)Core i9-12900K27.559,0Ryzen 9 5950X27.384,0Core i5-12600K17.516,0Ryzen 7 5800X17.040,0Core i9-10850K16.808,0Ryzen 5 5600X11.589,0030.315

 

u V-Ray benchmarku je 12600K ponovno usporediv s Ryzenom 7 5800X koji je nešto skuplji.

wPrime 2.0

wPrime 2.0Ryzen Threadripper 3970X23,9Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX31,6Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX38,6Ryzen 9 3950X42,4Ryzen 9 5950X45,9Ryzen Threadripper 2950X49,2Core i9-12900K52,2Threadripper 1950X54,1Ryzen Threadripper 2920X56,1Ryzen 9 3900X56,4Ryzen 9 3900XT56,5Ryzen 9 5900X60,0Threadripper 1920X62,6Core i9-10850K68,0i7-6950X69,2Core i5-12600K79,7Ryzen 7 3800XT80,1Ryzen R7 3700X82,8Core i7-10700K85,3Ryzen 7 5800X86,6Ryzen 7 2700X86,9Ryzen 7 1800X95,6i7-8700K103,9Ryzen 7 1700X106,9Ryzen 7 2700108,3i7-5960X110,6Ryzen 5 3600X113,3Ryzen 5 5600X116,4Ryzen 7 1700116,9Core i5-10600K118,7i7-7800X121,4Ryzen 5 2600X126,2Ryzen 5 2600126,8i7-4960X129,6Core i5-10500131,3Core i5-10400133,3i7-3960X135,1i7-5930K135,4Ryzen 5 1600X136,3i7-5820K138,7Ryzen 5 1600140,2i7-3930K149,9Ryzen 3 3300X158,6i5-8600K164,6i7-7700K167,4i7-6700K175,4i7-4790K176,0Ryzen 3 3100178,3i7-4770K186,5i7-3770K195,2Ryzen 5 1500X198,1i7-2600K213,5Ryzen 5 1400225,0FX-8150237,50261

 

Za kraj ovog dijela kao i uvijek donosimo wPrime test u kojem imamo mnoštvo rezultata, procesora starih čak i do 11 godina. Vidimo da je 12600K ovdje opet malo brži od 5800X, te nešto malo sporiji od 10850K.