OGLAS

Intel i7 6950X test

· · Procesori · Stranica 4 od 6

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

LuxMark v.2.0i7-6950X: 786i7-6950X786i7-5960X: 652i7-5960X652Radeon R7 260X: 644Radeon R7 260X644Radeon R7 260: 544Radeon R7 260544i7-5930K: 513i7-5930K513i7-5820K: 509i7-5820K509i7-4960X: 495i7-4960X495i7-3960X: 480i7-3960X480i7-6700K: 424i7-6700K424i7-4770R: 370i7-4770R370A10-7850K GPU: 286A10-7850K GPU286i5-6600K: 274i5-6600K274A10-7800 GPU: 263A10-7800 GPU263A8-7600 GPU: 232A8-7600 GPU2320865

U Luxmarku je 6950X brži oko 20.5% od 5960X-a.

wPrime 2.0i7-6950X: 86,854i7-6950X86,854i7-5960X: 116,929i7-5960X116,929i7-4960X: 129,637i7-4960X129,637i7-3960X: 135,127i7-3960X135,127i7-5930K: 136,293i7-5930K136,293i7-5820K: 140,245i7-5820K140,245i7-3930K: 164,566i7-3930K164,566i7-6700K: 178,347i7-6700K178,347i7-4790K: 186,468i7-4790K186,468i7-4770K: 195,174i7-4770K195,174i7-3770K: 198,092i7-3770K198,092i7-2600K: 225i7-2600K225FX-8150: 275,996FX-8150275,996i5-6600K: 277,733i5-6600K277,733i5-4670K: 285,449i5-4670K285,449i5-2500K: 321,608i5-2500K321,6080354

Očekivano, 6950X je i ovdje vrlo brz.

Handbrakei7-6950X: 78,3i7-6950X78,3i7-5820K: 52,3i7-5820K52,3i7-6700K: 40,5i7-6700K40,5086

Handbrake smo koristili za enkodiranje video materijala kako bi izmjerili i usporedili performanse u real life situaciji. Performanse deset jezgrenog procesora su izvrsne i u ovom slučaju za oko 50% bolje nego kod i dalje dosta brzog 5820K, te za oko 93% bolje od i7 6700K.

2400 MHz vs. XMP

7-ZIPi7 6950X @ XMP: 59.529i7 6950X @ XMP59.529i7 6950X @ 2400: 50.375i7 6950X @ 240050.375065.482
Cinebench 15i7 6950X @ XMP: 2.103i7 6950X @ XMP2.103i7 6950X @ 2400: 1.864i7 6950X @ 24001.86402.313
Luxmarki7 6950X @ XMP: 930i7 6950X @ XMP930i7 6950X @ 2400: 786i7 6950X @ 240078601.023
TrueCrypt v7.1i7 6950X @ XMP: 12,1i7 6950X @ XMP12,1i7 6950X @ 2400: 10,5i7 6950X @ 240010,5013

Ovdje smo odlučili pokazati koliki je porast performansi kada učitamo XMP profil s F4-3000C15Q-16GRR modula. Strap se tada automatski podigne sa 100 na 125 MHz, a procesor  radi na okruglih 4.0 GHz pri naponu od 1.25 V. Potrošnja sistema pri tome skoči za oko 100 W.

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

Stranica 4 od 6

OGLAS