Razer Blade 14 recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Mobilno · Stranica 3 od 4

Rezultati testova

Sintetika

PCMark 10 PCMark 10Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY)12.618,0Razer Blade 14 (2023)8.059,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G147.660,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S177.253,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE7.185,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 177.176,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF7.062,0Dell XPS 17 97106.342,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC6.280,0Dell XPS 15 95206.273,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC6.032,0Dell G7 77005.795,0Asus TUF Gaming A155.541,0Dell Precision 75305.203,0Dell G3 3590 (i7 9750H)5.181,0Dell G5 55905.135,0Asus G531GU5.064,0Dell XPS 15 95005.037,0Asus ZenBook Duo 144.948,0Dell XPS 17 97004.909,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED4.894,0Dell G7 77904.768,0Dell Vostro 35004.605,0Asus UX580GE4.330,0Dell G3 3590 (i5 9300H)4.309,0Dell Latitude 55004.306,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i7-9850H)4.256,0Dell Vostro 35804.167,0Dell Latitude 5501 (i5-9400H)4.132,0Dell Inspiron 73863.969,0Dell Latitude 95103.963,0Dell XPS 13 93803.889,0Dell Latitude 74903.562,0Dell XPS 13 93652.192,0013.880 Prijenosnik ima malo više performanse od prošlogodišnjeg modela Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 koji mu je zapravo i izravni konkurent. 3DMark Time Spy 3DMark Time SpyAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 -RTX 409020.355,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX407011.651,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 308010.903,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 406010.815,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M10.606,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 308010.240,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX 6800S8.861,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ8.068,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ7.872,0Dell G7 7700 – RTX 2070 Super7.867,0Dell G7 7790 – RTX2080 MaxQ7.242,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ6.975,0MSI GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X6.757,0Dell G5 5590 – RTX2070 MaxQ6.516,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – RTX 20606.083,0Asus G531GU – GTX1660Ti5.368,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX1660Ti MaxQ5.109,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – RTX 3050 Ti4.793,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – GTX1650 Ti3.831,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – GTX 1650 Ti3.653,0Dell G3 3590 – GTX 16503.639,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – Iris Xe1.835,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – Iris Xe1.786,0022.391 Time Spy performanse su po očekivanju više od RTX 4060, ali i RTX 3080 kartica. 3DMark Port Royal 3DMark Port RoyalAsus ROG Strix Scar 17 (G733PY) – RTX 409013.080,0Razer Blade 14 – RTX40707.063,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – RTX 30806.698,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – RTX 30806.328,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – RTX 40605.882,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Radeon RX 6800M5.515,0Asus STRIX RTX 3060 12GB5.220,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.700,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – RTX 3060 MaxQ4.017,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Radeon RX6800S3.923,0014.388 Ray tracing performanse u Port Royal testu su odlične, ponovno iznad RTX 3080.

Performanse u igrama

Company of Heroes 3 Company of Heroes 3 (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17128,8Sapphire RX 7600 Pulse OC127,2Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Blade 1499,60142 Performanse RTX 4070 kartice u ovoj igri nisu tako sjajne i biti će zanimljivo vidjeti kako se ponaša u ostatku naslova. F1 22 F1 22 (1920 x 1080)Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Default196,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ DXR + DLSS140,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ DXR103,00216 Kao što vidimo, pad performansi s uključenjem Ray Tracinga je velik, no dio njih možemo povratiti korištenjem DLSS-a. Horizon Zero Dawn Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate, 1920 x 1080)NVIDIA RTX 4090 @ SCAR 17176,0Nvidia RTX 4070 @ Blade 14119,0Nvidia RTX 4060 @ Aorus 17106,0Nvidia RTX 3080 @ SCAR 1797,0Radeon RX 6800M @ Strix G1593,0AMD Radeon RX 6800S @ Zephyrus G1492,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aorus 15G KC76,0RTX 3060 MaxQ @ Aero 15 KC73,0RTX 2070 Super63,0GTX1650 Ti31,00194 Vidimo da u HZD-u nije zaštucala kao u prethodnom naslovu i performanse su iznad RTX 4060 kako i trebaju biti. Ipak, imamo osjećaj da su mrvicu prigušene zbog manje šasije i da to u većem prijenosniku može još i bolje. The Calisto Protocol The Calisto Protocol (1920 x 1080)RTX 4070 @ Default80,4RTX 4070 @ DXR + FSR Quality64,8RTX 4070 @ DXR60,6088 The Calisto Protocol (1920 x 1080)RTX 4070 @ Default80,4RTX 4060 @ Default71,0088 Performanse bez uključenog Ray Tracinga su sasvim solidne, a ne padaju ispod razine igrivog ni kada ga uključimo. Ovdje smo koristili i FSR, tehnologiju koj radi i na Nvidijinim karticama kako bi ubrzali performanse s uključenim Ray Tracingom a rezultate možete vidjeti. Preporuka je koristiti Quality ili Balanced. Isto tako, kod igara koje podržavaju DLSS ne treba previše smanjivati kvalitetu slike. U usporedbi s RTX 4060 je brža za oko 13,3% no vjerujemo da u većem prijenosniku to može i bolje. Na kraju samo recimo da smo testirali sve naslove i u nativnoj 1600p rezoluciji i pad performansi nije bio takav da testirane igre postanu neigrive.

CPU Performanse

Cinebench R20 Cinebench 20 Multicore CPUAsus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX12.469,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS6.280,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H6.025,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – Core i9-11900H5.435,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – Ryzen 9 5900HX5.379,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – Ryzen 9 5900HX5.256,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK5.187,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS4.800,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – Ryzen 7 4800H3.931,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – i7 10870H3.625,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – i7 10870H3.424,0Dell G7 7700 – i7 10750H3.315,0Dell G7 7790 – i9 9880H3.054,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – i7 10750H2.928,0Asus G531GU – i7 9750H2.648,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – i7 10750H2.634,0Dell G5 5590 – i7 9750H2.560,0Dell Precision 7530 – i7 8750H2.550,0Dell G3 3590 – i7 9750H2.515,0Asus UX580GE – i9 8950HK2.044,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – i7 1165G72.020,0Dell G3 3590 – i5 9300H1.766,0Dell Latitude 5500 – i7 8665U1.505,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – i7-1065G71.454,0Dell Vostro 3500 – i7 1165G71.445,0Dell Latitude 9510 – i7-10810U1.439,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – i7 8665U1.347,0Dell Vostro 3580 – i7 8565U1.293,0Dell XPS 13 9380 – i7 8565U1.257,0013.716 Cinebench 23 Multicore CPURyzen 9 7950X37.776,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzen 9 7945HX32.274,0Ryzen 9 7900X29.303,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H15.962,0Ryzen 5 7600X15.409,0Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS15.115,0041.554 Performanse procesora su po očekivanju vrlo visoke i sasvim su u rangu s konkurentom i7-13700H. Blender Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Asus ROG Scar 17 – Ryzn 9 7945HX77,7Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H154,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS167,2Ryzen 9 5900HX176,7Core i9-11900H181,7Ryzen 9 5900HX @ Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17182,2AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS @ Asus ROG Zephyrus G14185,0Ryzen 7 4800H228,0Ryzen 7 3700X233,0Dell XPS 15 9520 – i9-12900HK237,3Core i7 10750H258,1Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7 10870H275,7i5-10600K301,70332 Blender Gooseberry (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 7 7700X527,3Gigabyte Aorus 17 – Core i7-13700H790,6Razer Blade 14 – Ryzen 9 7940HS1.158,101.274 Procesor i dalje dokazuje svoju moć i kao što vidimo sasvim je u rangu s destop Ryzenom 9 3900X – impresivno.

Memorijske performanse 

AIDA Memory AIDA Memory – ReadGigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480067.240,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80063.180,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560061.175,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480059.126,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.666,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20046.644,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.936,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.504,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00041.081,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.979,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93338.898,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99338.500,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.827,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.721,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293337.280,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266635.413,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.425,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240032.884,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.876,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66729.969,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213329.688,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.488,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.827,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L27.155,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213326.830,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320024.509,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.290,0Dell Precision M6800 – 2x4GB DDR3L23.120,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L21.151,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L19.772,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L18.210,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.787,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.639,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.292,0073.964 AIDA Memory – WriteRazer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560077.484,0Asus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80066.366,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480060.204,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480057.583,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480055.150,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20045.592,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00044.859,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293344.706,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20042.098,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93340.291,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99339.635,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93339.627,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.798,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266637.621,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66737.124,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240034.834,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66734.035,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66733.310,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99332.951,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213331.835,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L31.531,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20031.460,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213331.017,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213328.479,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L26.818,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L24.970,0Acer Aspire V13 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.893,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320023.107,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L19.776,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.929,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.815,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L17.759,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.439,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L14.544,0085.232 AIDA Memory – copyAsus ZenBookDuo 14 – 2x16GB 2.80064.509,0Razer Blade 14 – 2x8GB DDR5-560061.611,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 BKF – 2x16GB DDR5-480058.908,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 2×16 GB DDR5-480051.082,0Asus ROG Scar 17 – 2x16GB DDR5-480048.811,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20041.091,0Dell G7 7700 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.00040.090,0Asus TUF Gaming A15 – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20040.025,0Dell Precision 7530 – 2x 16GB DDR4 293338.128,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 2x 16GB DDR4 3.20036.926,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 2x8GB 2.93335.188,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 2x8GB 2.93334.508,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 2x 8GB DDR4 2.99333.186,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x8GB DDR4 266632.709,0Dell G5 5590 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66732.163,0Dell G7 7790 – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.871,0Asus UX580GE – 2x8GB DDR4 2.66731.333,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 2x8GB DDR4 240030.654,0Acer Aspire V17 Nitro – 2x8GB DDR4 213329.712,0Dell XPS 17 9700 – 2x8GB 2.99329.405,0Dell Latitude 9510 – 2x8GG DDR3 213328.446,0Dell G3 3590 – 2x4GB DDR4 2.66727.379,0Dell XPS 9380 – 2x 8GB DDR3L27.082,0Asus G751JY – 4x8GB DDR3L26.430,0HP Omen 17 – 2x8GB DDR4 213325.618,0Dell Inspiron 7737 – 2x8GB DDR3L24.606,0Dell XPS 13 9365- 2x 8GB DDR3L24.296,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 1x 8GB DDR4L 320022.232,0Asus ROG Strix G – 1x 16GB DDR4L20.839,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 1x16GB DDR4L19.047,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 1x8GB DDR4L17.016,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.863,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 1x8GB DDR4L16.798,0Dell 7567 – 1x16GB DDR4L15.220,0070.960 Propusnost memorijskog podsustava je očekivano vrlo visoka.

SSD performanse

Čitanje ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KGigabyte AG470S 1 TB6.533,0Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 146.210,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB6.030,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.950,0Micron 2450 1TB3.440,0Toshiba 1TB3.340,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.200,0WDC SN730 1TB2.970,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G72.950,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F2.920,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.920,0Toshiba XG6 512GB2.900,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB2.810,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.750,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.730,0Kioxia XG6 1TB2.710,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.473,4Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G32.350,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB2.220,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35002.210,0Kioxia BG4 512GB2.170,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB2.080,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.521,9WDC PC SN520 @ G31.480,1WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.440,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.370,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.340,0Toshiba BG3 512GB1.210,0Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G1.040,2SK Hynix SC311 256GB741,6Toshiba MQ04ABF100563,7ST1000LM035120,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G3104,4102,007.186 Zapis ATTO Disk Benchmark 512KGigabyte AG470S 1 TB5.221,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB4.770,0Samsung PM9A1 2TB- Scar 174.610,0Samsung PM9A1 – Blade 144.600,0Micron 2450 1TB3.950,0SKHynix PC711 1TB3.080,0WDC SN730 1TB2.830,0Samsung PM981a 1TB2.810,0Toshiba 1TB2.460,0Gigabyte SSD 512GB2.350,0SKHynix PC611 1TB @ XPS 152.280,0Samsung 960 Evo 1TB2.210,0SKHynix PC601 512GB @ G71.690,0Kioxia XG6 1TB1.600,0Samsung PM991a 512 GB1.480,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB @ G31.460,0WDC PC SN520 @ G31.370,0WDC PC SN520 256 GB1.340,0Kioxia BG4 512GB1.330,0Kioxia BG4 512GB @ Vostro 35001.310,0Toshiba BG3 256GB1.210,0Toshiba BG4 256 GB1.080,0Kingston OM8PCP3512F932,7Toshiba BG3 256GB690,0SK Hynix PC401 512GB636,1Toshiba KBG30ZMS512G540,0SK Hynix SC311 256GB349,5Toshiba BG3 512GB344,0Toshiba MQ04ABF100102,0WDC WD10SPZX @ G396,6ST1000LM03585,905.743 Samsungov se PM9A1 još jednom pokazao kao vrlo brz disk dostojan jednog flagshipa.

Autonomija

4K@30fps playbackDell Latitude 9510 – 88Wh875,0Asus ROG Strix G15 AE – 90Wh634,0Dell Latitude 5500 – 68Wh518,0Asus ZenBook Duo 14 – 70Wh470,0Dell Latitude 7490 – 60 Wh465,0Asus Zenbook 14X OLED – 63Wh435,0Dell G7 7700 – 97Wh409,0Gigabyte Aorus 17 – 99 Wh396,0Asus ROG Strix SCAR 17 – 90 Wh390,0Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 – 76 Wh390,0Dell Vostro 3500 – 42Wh375,0Dell XPS 15 9500 – 84 Wh374,0Dell Inspiron 3593 – 42 Wh367,0Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 – 90 Wh359,0Dell XPS 13 – 52 Wh346,0Gigabyte Aorus 15G KC – 99Wh345,0Dell XPS 17 9710 – 97Wh332,0Dell Vostro 3580 – 42 Wh323,0Gigabyte Aero 15 KC – 99Wh318,0Dell Precision 7530 – 97 Wh312,0Razer Blade 14 – 68 Wh302,0Dell 3590 G3 – 51 Wh274,0Asus UX580GE – 71 Wh272,0G531GU – 67 Wh256,0G3 3590 – 51 Wh255,0G5 5590 – 60 Wh239,0Dell G7 7790 – 60Wh237,0Dell Inspiron 7386 – 38Wh221,0Asus Scar 17 – 90Wh184,00963 Jasno je da baterija kapaciteta 68 Wh i s ovako moćnim hardverom ne može dugo trajati, no nešto malo preko 5 sati autonomije je ipak sasvim solidno. To znači da će te u normalnom radu izvući i preko 6 sati, a na igranje nemojte ni pomišljati ako prijenosnik nije uključen na pretvarač.

Zagrijavanje i buka

razer_blade_14_18
 
razer_blade_14_17

Zagrijavanje i buku smo mjerili u igri jer kada je opterećen samo procesor ove brojke su puno niže – kao da mu rashladni sustav ne da da se u potpunosti “razmaše”. Tako je površina prijenosnika dosegla visokih 52°C, a buka 47,9 dB(A). No, prilikom igre je ionako najbolje koristiti kakav kontroler i slušalice pa nećete osjetiti toplinu radne površine, a ni čuti buku rashladnog sustava. Inače, ovakve brojke su i očekivane jer je hardver moćan, a šasija relativno mala.

POVEZANI ČLANCI