Rezultati testova – treći dio
Cinebench 15 @ OpenGL Sapphire R9 290X 8GB: 127,38 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB 127,38 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC: 125,60 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC 125,60 0 140
Basemark CL1.1 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC: 486,56 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC 486,56 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB: 465,19 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB 465,19 0 535
Luxmark Room Sapphire R9 290X @ CFX: 2.930 Sapphire R9 290X @ CFX 2.930 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC: 1.610 Sapphire R9 290X 4GB OC 1.610 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB: 1.533 Sapphire R9 290X 8GB 1.533 0 3.223
Ova tri testa ćemo prokomentirati zajednički. OpenGL performanse su odlične, a vidimo kako po prvi puta 8GB ima prednost nad 4GB verzijom. OpenCL performanse su također vrlo visoke, a 4GB u oba test ima prednost nad 8GB verzijom – ovdje je ipak takt najbitniji.
Buka Asus GTX780 STRIX OC: 45 Asus GTX780 STRIX OC 45 Nvidia GTX780: 45 Nvidia GTX780 45 Nvidia GTX780 Ti: 47 Nvidia GTX780 Ti 47 Asus GTX680 DCUII: 48 Asus GTX680 DCUII 48 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti: 48 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX78… 48 Nvidia GeForce GTX980: 48 Nvidia GeForce GTX980 48 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4GB OC: 48 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4… 48 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8GB: 48 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8… 48 AMD Radeon R9 290X @ Uber: 49 AMD Radeon R9 290X @ Uber 49 AMD Radeon R9 290 @ Uber: 49 AMD Radeon R9 290 @ Uber 49 ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II: 49 ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II 49 ASUS MARS 760: 51 ASUS MARS 760 51 0 56
Obje kartice su zadovoljavajuće tihe kada je high-end u pitanju, a bučnije su tek kada su skupa u CFX polju i kada se sve pojačano zagrijava.
Potrošnja Nvidia GTX980: 375 Nvidia GTX980 375 Nvidia GTX780: 427 Nvidia GTX780 427 Asus GTX780 STRIX OC: 495 Asus GTX780 STRIX OC 495 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti: 497 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX78… 497 ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II: 499 ASUS GTX780Ti DCU II 499 AMD Radeon R9 290: 502 AMD Radeon R9 290 502 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4GB OC: 502 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4… 502 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8GB: 503 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8… 503 AMD Radeon R9 290X: 508 AMD Radeon R9 290X 508 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX: 541 2x PowerColor R9 270 @ CFX 541 0 595
R9 290X nije poznat po štedljivosti i na našem overclockiranom sistemu je maksimalna potrošnja iznosila oko 500 W. Premda podatak nismo stavljali u tablice, dobro je znati – u CFX-u se potrošnja penje na preko 800W.
Zagrijavanje ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC: 62 ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC 62 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4GB OC: 70 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 4… 70 Asus GTX780 STRIX OC: 71 Asus GTX780 STRIX OC 71 Gigabyte GTX580 SOC: 71 Gigabyte GTX580 SOC 71 MSI GTX770 TwinFrozr: 71 MSI GTX770 TwinFrozr 71 Gigabyte GTX770 OC: 71 Gigabyte GTX770 OC 71 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8GB: 71 Sapphire R9 290X Vapor-X 8… 71 Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X: 75 Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X 75 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX780Ti: 75 ASUS Matrix Platinum GTX78… 75 Nvidia GTX980: 80 Nvidia GTX980 80 Nvidia GTX780 Ti: 83 Nvidia GTX780 Ti 83 ASUS MARS 760: 93 ASUS MARS 760 93 AMD Radeon R9 290: 94 AMD Radeon R9 290 94 AMD Radeon R9 290X: 95 AMD Radeon R9 290X 95 0 105
Hladnjak je identičan na obje kartice pa su i temperature vrlo slične. Malo viši takt na 4GB verziji očito nije presudan.