Rezultati testova – prvi dio
3DMark Firestrike 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ CFX: 11.544 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X… 11.544 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 8.063 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 8.063 MSI R9 280X: 7.669 MSI R9 280X 7.669 AMD HD7970 GHz: 7.161 AMD HD7970 GHz 7.161 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 7.078 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 7.078 XFX R9 280 Black OC: 6.974 XFX R9 280 Black OC 6.974 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 6.459 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 6.459 Asus GTX680 DCUII: 6.434 Asus GTX680 DCUII 6.434 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 6.086 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 6.086 Asus Striker Platinum: 6.070 Asus Striker Platinum 6.070 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 5.759 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 5.759 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP: 5.685 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP 5.685 Gigabyte R9 270 OC: 5.268 Gigabyte R9 270 OC 5.268 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 5.117 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 5.117 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X: 4.645 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X 4.645 0 12.698 XFX kartica odmah po očekivanju zasjeda iznad Sapphireove u 3DMarku i opasno se približava GTX770 modelu.
Bioshock Infinite 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ CFX: 134,24 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X… 134,24 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 100,77 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 100,77 MSI R9 280X: 100,38 MSI R9 280X 100,38 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 96,70 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 96,70 Asus GTX680 DCUII: 91,37 Asus GTX680 DCUII 91,37 AMD HD7970 GHz: 89,81 AMD HD7970 GHz 89,81 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP: 87,54 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP 87,54 XFX R9 280 Black OC: 83,69 XFX R9 280 Black OC 83,69 Asus Striker Platinum: 83,07 Asus Striker Platinum 83,07 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 78,21 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 78,21 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 75,86 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 75,86 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP: 74,77 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP 74,77 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 74,25 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 74,25 Gigabyte R9 270 OC: 69,69 Gigabyte R9 270 OC 69,69 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 62,33 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 62,33 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X: 55,88 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X 55,88 0 148 Bioshock Infinite 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ CFX: 106,04 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X… 106,04 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 80,62 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 80,62 MSI R9 280X: 75,47 MSI R9 280X 75,47 Asus GTX680 DCUII: 72,85 Asus GTX680 DCUII 72,85 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 72,55 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 72,55 AMD HD7970 GHz: 67,41 AMD HD7970 GHz 67,41 Asus Striker Platinum: 67,1 Asus Striker Platinum 67,1 XFX R9 280 Black OC: 62,69 XFX R9 280 Black OC 62,69 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP: 61,45 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP 61,45 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 59,32 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 59,32 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 56,09 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 56,09 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP: 54,96 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP 54,96 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 54,92 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 54,92 Gigabyte R9 270 OC: 51,9 Gigabyte R9 270 OC 51,9 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 46,75 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 46,75 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X: 42,48 Sapphire R7 265 Dual-X 42,48 0 117 Razlika između dva R9 280 modela je poprilična za što su podjednako zaslužni i viši takt grafičkog procesora i memorije. CFX skaliranje je nešto bolje s uključenim DDOF-om nego bez.
Company of Heroes 2 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 57,86 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 57,86 XFX R9 280 Black OC: 52,17 XFX R9 280 Black OC 52,17 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 49,37 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 49,37 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 42,97 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 42,97 Asus Striker Platinum: 40,26 Asus Striker Platinum 40,26 0 64 XFX je u COH2 skoro pa 3 fps-a brža od Sapphire modela što je vrlo solidan napredak. COH, baš kao ni Thief ne podržavaju CFX pa tu neće biti rezultata.
Crysis 3 (1920 x 1200 @ VH, FXAA, AF16x) 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ CFX: 59,417 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X… 59,417 XFX R9 280 Black OC: 37,825 XFX R9 280 Black OC 37,825 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 36,983 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 36,983 Asus Striker Platinum: 29,897 Asus Striker Platinum 29,897 0 65 Ubacili smo i Crysis rezultate koji je vrlo zahtjevan po ove modele i za dobbbar je gaming najbolje isključiti antialiasing. GTX760 je ovdje u dosta podređenoj situaciji u odnosu na R9 280. Crossfire setup pak omogućuje glatko igranje.
