Rezultati testova – treći dio
Potrošnja Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 320 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 320 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP: 330 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP 330 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 333 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 333 Gigabyte R9 270 OC: 340 Gigabyte R9 270 OC 340 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 350 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 350 Asus Striker Platinum: 358 Asus Striker Platinum 358 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 362 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 362 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 370 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 370 MSI R9 280X: 371 MSI R9 280X 371 Asus GTX680 DCUII: 375 Asus GTX680 DCUII 375 XFX R9 280 Black OC: 375 XFX R9 280 Black OC 375 AMD HD7970 GHz Edition: 422 AMD HD7970 GHz Edition 422 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 425 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 425 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X @ CFX: 577 2x Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X… 577 0 635 XFX je za 5W rastrošnija od Dual-X-a, a obje su tu negdje u rangu sa 280X karticama. Dual setup podiže potrošnju za dodatnih 200W.
Temperature Gigabyte R9 270 OC: 60 Gigabyte R9 270 OC 60 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic: 60 Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 60 Asus GTX680 DCUII: 61 Asus GTX680 DCUII 61 MSI GTX770 Lightning: 62 MSI GTX770 Lightning 62 ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC: 62 ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC 62 XFX R9 280 Black OC: 62 XFX R9 280 Black OC 62 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X: 64 Sapphire R9 280 Dual-X 64 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X: 65 Sapphire R9 270 Dual-X 65 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP: 67 ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP 67 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X: 67 Sapphire R9 270X Vapor-X 67 Asus Striker Platinum: 67 Asus Striker Platinum 67 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP: 68 ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP 68 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC: 68 ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC 68 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X: 68 Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X 68 0 75 XFX ima izvrsno hlađenje koje je tek za 1 dB bučnije od Dual-X-a u automatskom načinu rada no zato je i GPU dva stupnja hladniji. To se hlađenje pokazalo izvrsnim i za overclocking kao što smo vidjeli.
