Xiaomi Mi 5X (A1) recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Mobilno · Stranica 3 od 4

Rezultati testova

PCMark (Work 2.0)Sony Xperia XZ Premium6.404,0Huawei Mate 95.817,0Sony Xperia X Performance5.563,0Honor 85.469,0Huawei P95.248,0Xiaomi Mi Mix Prime5.234,0Xiaomi Mi5s5.125,0Samsung S8+5.106,0Sony Xperia XZ4.969,0Sony Xperia X Compact4.881,0Xiaomi Mi 5X4.723,0Sony Xperia Z5 Compact4.292,0Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra3.967,0Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)3.662,0CAT S603.616,0Sony Xperia XA3.518,0Wiko U Feel Lite2.821,0Sony Xperia E52.684,007.044

PCMark rezultat je vrlo solidan i tek mao nižih od onih koje su postigli Sonyevi uređaji sa Snapdragonom 650 (X Compact) ili Snapdragonom 820 (XZ).

3DMark Sling Shot ExtremeSamsung S8+3.187,0Sony Xperia XZ Premium3.046,0Xiaomi Mi Mix Prime2.510,0Sony Xperia XZ2.472,0Sony Xperia X Performance2.376,0Sony Xperia Z5 Compact1.662,0Honor 8887,0Sony Xperia X Compact854,0Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra639,0Xiaomi Mi 5X464,0Sony Xperia XA429,0CAT S60396,0Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)309,0Sony Xperia E5198,0Wiko U Feel Lite117,003.506

Adreno 506 nije naročito moćna grafika pa je i rezultat u skladu s tim, i tu je negdje sa Mali-T860MP2 grafikom iz Xperie XA, te malo niža od Mali-T880MP2 iz Xperie XA1 Ultra. Pokretanjem nekoliko igara (Galaxy of Heroes, Real Moto, NFS No Limits, FIFA Mobile itd.) utvrdili smo kako nema trzanja i sve igre rade u zadovoljavajućem framerateu.

BaseMark OS IISony Xperia XZ Premium3.450,0Apple iPhone 7 Plus3.281,0Samsung S8+3.257,0Apple iPhone 72.797,0Sony Xperia X Performance2.241,0Apple iPhone 6S2.232,0Sony Xperia XZ2.165,0Xiaomi Mi Mix Prime2.035,0HTC 101.994,0Honor 81.953,0Sony Xperia Z5 Compact1.841,0Sony Xperia X Compact1.829,0Sony Xperia Z5 Premium1.532,0Xiaomi Mi 5X1.390,0Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra1.332,0Apple iPhone 61.276,0Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)1.029,0CAT S601.002,0Wiko U Feel Lite576,0Sony Xperia E5557,003.795

Basemark rezultat ga smješta između Xperie XA1 Ultra i Z5 Premiuma što uopće nije loše.

Geekbench 4 (single-core score)Samsung S8+1.995,0Hauwei Mate 91.942,0Sony Xperia XZ Premium1.909,0Xiaomi Mi Mix Prime1.825,0Xiaomi Mi5s1.801,0Huawei P91.726,0Honor 81.693,0Sony Xperia X Performance1.585,0Sony Xperia XZ1.581,0Sony Xperia X Compact1.394,0Sony Xperia Z5 Compact1.361,0Dell Venue 8 78401.079,0Xiaomi Mi 5X875,0Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra841,0Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)712,0CAT S60705,0Huawei T2 8 Pro623,0Sony Xperia E5571,0Wiko U Feel Lite563,002.195 Geekbench 4 (multi-core score)Samsung S8+6.683,0Sony Xperia XZ Premium6.451,0Huawei Mate 95.864,0Honor 85.324,0Huawei P94.695,0Xiaomi Mi 5X4.316,0Xiaomi Mi5s4.262,0Sony Xperia XZ4.217,0Xiaomi Mi Mix Prime3.842,0Sony Xperia X Performance3.762,0Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra3.575,0Sony Xperia X Compact3.562,0Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)3.410,0Dell Venue 8 78403.074,0Sony Xperia Z5 Compact2.257,0CAT S602.198,0Huawei T2 8 Pro1.928,0Wiko U Feel Lite1.591,0Sony Xperia E51.487,007.351 Geekbench 4 (render script)Samsung S8+8.708,0Sony Xperia XZ Premium7.980,0Sony Xperia XZ7.122,0Xiaomi Mi Mix Prime6.899,0Sony Xperia X Performance6.844,0Sony Xperia Z5 Compact3.728,0Sony Xperia X Compact3.385,0Xiaomi Mi 5X3.215,0Huawei P93.195,0Honor 83.119,0Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra2.790,0Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)2.379,0CAT S601.891,0Wiko U Feel Lite806,0Sony Xperia E5802,009.579

Single-core rezultat nije sjajan, no to sve popravlja multi-core jer 625-ica ima osam brzih jezgri. Renderscript rezultat je blizak X Compactu i njegovom Snapdragonu 650.

PCMark Work battery life (min)Sony Xperia X Compact659,0Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra583,0Samsung S8+568,0Xiaomi Mi 5X492,0Sony Xperia Z5 Premium482,0Sony Xperia Z3 Compact481,0Coolpad Modena480,0HTC 10471,0Sony Xperia XZ467,0CAT S60464,0Honor 8462,0Dell Venue 8 7840427,0Sony Xperia Z5420,0Wiko U Feel Lite373,0LG G4365,0HTC Desire 626359,0Sony Xperia XZ Premium348,0Sony Xperia E5328,0Meizu MX3320,0Lenovo Vibe X2316,0Sony Xperia X Performance294,0LG G4 Stylus283,0Sony Xperia XA254,0Prestigio Grace206,00725

Dobru smo autonomiju već spomenuli, a PCMarkov test je to samo dodatno potvrdio s rezultatom dužim od osam sati.

POVEZANI ČLANCI