Rezultati testiranja
Rezultati testiranja
Propusnost XMP profila i usporedba s drugim kitovima @ Ryzen 9950X
AIDA64 RAM Read G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RS: 78.443 G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-… 78.443 G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal Neo F5-6000J2636H16GX2-TR5NS: 78.057 G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal N… 78.057 Lancer Neon AX5U6000C3016G: 77.374 Lancer Neon AX5U6000C3016G 77.374 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G: 77.191 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 77.191 0 86.287 AIDA64 RAM Write G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RS: 90.176 G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-… 90.176 XPG Lancer Neon AX5U6000C3016G: 79.228 XPG Lancer Neon AX5U6000C3… 79.228 G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal Neo F5-6000J2636H16GX2-TR5NS: 79.181 G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal N… 79.181 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G: 77.390 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 77.390 0 99.194 AIDA64 RAM Copy G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RS: 75.382 G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-… 75.382 G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal Neo F5-6000J2636H16GX2-TR5NS: 71.068 G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal N… 71.068 XPG Lancer Neon AX5U6000C3016G: 69.724 XPG Lancer Neon AX5U6000C3… 69.724 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G: 67.662 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 67.662 0 82.920 AIDA64 RAM Latency G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal Neo F5-6000J2636H16GX2-TR5NS: 80,2 G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal N… 80,2 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G: 80,4 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 80,4 XPG Lancer Neon AX5U6000C3016G: 81,5 XPG Lancer Neon AX5U6000C3… 81,5 G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RS: 86,2 G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB F5-… 86,2 0 95 Performanse memorije su mrvicu niže od Neon kita, a ovdje ih možemo direktno usporediti jer smo ih testirali još na Ryzenu 9 9950X. Sve ostale testove smo napravili na Ryzenu 9 9950X koji je u ključnom trenutku testiranja zamijenio prethodnika.
Razlika u propusnosti kod overclockinga ,XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G kita @ Ryzen 9950X3D
AIDA64 RAM Read XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6400: 81.196 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 81.196 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6000: 76.629 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 76.629 0 89.316 AIDA64 RAM Write XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6400: 85.125 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 85.125 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6000: 76.562 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 76.562 0 93.638 AIDA64 RAM Copy XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6400: 72.584 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 72.584 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6000: 66.434 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 66.434 0 79.842 AIDA64 RAM Latency XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6400: 79,9 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 79,9 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6000: 80,2 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 80,2 0 88 Overclocking na 6.400 MT/s pri istim latencijama povećao je propusnost, ali i smanjio latenciju. To je zahtijevalo manju korekciju napona memorije prema gore, no to nije drastično povećalo zagrijavanje.
Razlika u CPU performansama – EXPO vs. OC @ Ryzen 9950X3D
7-Zip (MIPS) XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6400: 170.567 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 170.567 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6000: 168.177 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 168.177 0 187.624 Cinebench 24 nT XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6400: 2.343 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 2.343 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6000: 2.294 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 2.294 0 2.577 Cinebench 24 1T XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6400: 137 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 137 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6000: 133 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 133 0 151 Blender Gooseberry (sekunde, manje je bolje) XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6400: 166,1 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 166,1 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G @ 6000: 171,6 XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C… 171,6 0 189 Tko kaže da se overclocking memorije ne isplati, evo mu dokaza. U svim je benchmarcima procesor povećao svoje performanse. Nije drastično povećanje, no ipak je povećanje.
