Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Pro & Edge recenzija

· Krešimir Matanović · Hlađenje · Stranica 3 od 4

Rezultati testova

Zagrijavanje i buka

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X @ Stock Cinebench R23 nT loop

Temperature (Tdie)Asus ROG Ryujin III 360 ARGB92,5Endorfy Navis F36094,9Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge95,8ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 X.96,3Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE96,6Noctua NH-L9a-AM596,8Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Pro97,1DeepCool AK50097,1ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB97,5ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic97,6CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB98,5DeepCool AS500 Plus98,50108

Temperature modernih procesora su kao što znamo visoke jer ih ploče tjeraju do maksimuma (slično kao kod laptopa), pa na ovaj rezultat ne treba ni obraćati pažnju previše. Ovdje je Edge malo uspješniji od Pro modela, no kod oba je zadržavanje taktova kod procesora jednako. Idemo vidjeti kakva će situacija biti s performansama.

Performanse

3DMark CPU profileAlphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge9.157,0Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Pro9.100,0CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB9.090,0ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB9.070,0ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic9.065,0Endorfy Navis F3609.061,0Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE9.058,0ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT9.011,0DeepCool AK5008.970,0Noctua NH-L9a-AM58.818,0DeepCool AS500 Plus8.698,0010.073 Cinebench 23 nTAlphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge19.612,0Asus ROG Ryujin III 360 ARGB19.598,0Endorfy Navis F36019.517,0Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Pro19.472,0Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE19.459,0ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic19.437,0ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB19.342,0ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT19.325,0CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB19.275,0DeepCool AK50018.944,0Noctua NH-L9a-AM518.755,0DeepCool AS500 Plus18.649,0021.573 Cinebench 23 1TEndorfy Navis F3601.979,0ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT1.979,0ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic1.967,0Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge1.966,0DeepCool AK5001.965,0Asus ROG Ryujin III 360 ARGB1.963,0ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB1.958,0DeepCool AS500 Plus1.957,0Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE1.951,0Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Pro1.945,0CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB1.902,0Noctua NH-L9a-AM51.808,002.177 Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE71,0Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge71,0Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Pro71,0Asus ROG Ryujin III 360 ARGB71,0CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB71,0Endorfy Navis F36072,0ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT72,0ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB72,0ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic72,0DeepCool AK50073,0DeepCool AS500 Plus73,0Noctua NH-L9a-AM575,0083 HandbrakeEndorfy Navis F36065,2Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge65,1Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Pro65,0Asus ROG Ryujin III 360 ARGB64,9CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB64,6DeepCool AS500 Plus64,5ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic64,4ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT64,3Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE64,2ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB64,1DeepCool AK50063,6Noctua NH-L9a-AM562,1072 V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge22.460,0Asus ROG Ryujin III 360 ARGB22.451,0Endorfy Navis F36022.417,0Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Pro22.399,0CoolerMaster ML240L Core ARGB22.392,0ID-Cooling SE-225-XT Basic22.159,0ID-Cooling Frostflow 240 XT22.150,0Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE22.117,0ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS ARGB21.834,0DeepCool AS500 Plus21.818,0DeepCool AK50021.559,0Noctua NH-L9a-AM521.251,0024.706

Performanse 7700X procesora s Edge hladnjakom su izvrsne i to je dokaz da je on zapravo idealan za ovaj segment. Pro ima puno veće kapacitete, ali za to iskoristiti treba i puno jači procesor. S manjim se procesorom mrvicu slabije snašao, premda performanse nisu ni malo loše. Jednostavno je namijenjen HEDT segmentu i tu će biti puno bolji.

POVEZANI ČLANCI