OGLAS

AMD Radeon Pro Duo test

· · Video · Stranica 3 od 4

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

SPECviewperf 12.0.2.

catia-04Radeon R9 295X2: 71,44Radeon R9 295X271,44FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 62,32FirePro W8100 @ desktop62,32FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 60,56FirePro W8100 @ eGPU60,56Radeon Pro Duo: 59,55Radeon Pro Duo59,55FirePro M6100: 41,74FirePro M610041,74079
creo-01FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 44,54FirePro W8100 @ desktop44,54FirePro M6100: 43,55FirePro M610043,55FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 42,24FirePro W8100 @ eGPU42,24Radeon Pro Duo: 36,43Radeon Pro Duo36,43Radeon R9 295X2: 32,99Radeon R9 295X232,99049
energy-01Radeon Pro Duo: 5,78Radeon Pro Duo5,78Radeon R9 295X2: 3,77Radeon R9 295X23,77FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 3,53FirePro W8100 @ desktop3,53FirePro M6100: 0,51FirePro M61000,51FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 0FirePro W8100 @ eGPU006
maya-04Radeon Pro Duo: 72,13Radeon Pro Duo72,13FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 60,77FirePro W8100 @ desktop60,77Radeon R9 295X2: 58,20Radeon R9 295X258,20FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 56,04FirePro W8100 @ eGPU56,04FirePro M6100: 36,2FirePro M610036,2079
medical-01Radeon Pro Duo: 32,97Radeon Pro Duo32,97FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 28,97FirePro W8100 @ desktop28,97Radeon R9 295X2: 27,38Radeon R9 295X227,38FirePro M6100: 14,18FirePro M610014,18FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 0FirePro W8100 @ eGPU0036
showcase-01Radeon Pro Duo: 70,71Radeon Pro Duo70,71Radeon R9 295X2: 68Radeon R9 295X268FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 60,43FirePro W8100 @ desktop60,43FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 45,81FirePro W8100 @ eGPU45,81FirePro M6100: 24,32FirePro M610024,32078
snx-02FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 79,29FirePro W8100 @ desktop79,29FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 59,62FirePro W8100 @ eGPU59,62FirePro M6100: 48,3FirePro M610048,3Radeon R9 295X2: 16,95Radeon R9 295X216,95Radeon Pro Duo: 16,25Radeon Pro Duo16,25087
snx-03FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 81,95FirePro W8100 @ desktop81,95FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 78,48FirePro W8100 @ eGPU78,48FirePro M6100: 69,72FirePro M610069,72Radeon Pro Duo: 60,15Radeon Pro Duo60,15Radeon R9 295X2: 58,17Radeon R9 295X258,17090

SPECviewperf kao što znamo testira s realnim workload-ovima iz pojedinih aplikacija, a tu vidimo dosta šarolike performanse s tim da je u svemu osim u Catia testu Pro Duo ipak nešto brža od 295X2.

Basemark v.1.1

Optimized full profileRadeon Pro Duo: 454,20Radeon Pro Duo454,20Radeon R9 295X2: 435,392Radeon R9 295X2435,392FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 374,473FirePro W8100 @ desktop374,473FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 237,776FirePro W8100 @ eGPU237,776FirePro M6100: 182,671FirePro M6100182,6710500

I Basemark donosi laganu prednost za Pro Duo.

Luxmark v.2.0

RoomRadeon Pro Duo: 3.328Radeon Pro Duo3.328Radeon R9 295X2: 3.013Radeon R9 295X23.013FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 1.194FirePro W8100 @ desktop1.194FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 1.008FirePro W8100 @ eGPU1.008FirePro M6100: 529FirePro M610052903.661

Ponovno desetak posto veći rezultat za Pro Duo u odnosu na 295X2.

ratGPU v.0.8.0

HighRadeon Pro Duo: 54,461Radeon Pro Duo54,461Radeon R9 295X2: 66,358Radeon R9 295X266,358FirePro W8100 @ desktop: 149,724FirePro W8100 @ desktop149,724FirePro W8100 @ eGPU: 200,488FirePro W8100 @ eGPU200,488FirePro M6100: 424,425FirePro M6100424,4250467

Ray-trace benchmark odlično skalira na dva GPU-a, a ovdje ponovno vidimo blagu prednost Pro Duo kartice nad njezinom prethodnicom.

Rezultati testova – drugi dio

Stranica 3 od 4

OGLAS