Rezultati testova – treći dio
The Secret World
|
 |
| 2560×1440 @ Ultra |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 71,743 |
 |
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 68,477 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 62,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
5 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 @ Ultra w. Tesselation |
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 48,657 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 45,964 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 45,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
5 |
|
| |
| 5760×1080 @ Ultra |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 45,244 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 43,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
5 |
|
| |
| 5760×1080 @ Ultra w. Tesselation |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 30,879 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 30,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
5 |
|
| |
Sve dok ne uključimo teselaciju, 290 je u prednosti nakon čega do izražaja dolaze bolje performanse GTX780 modela. Pri Eyefinity testu je situacija između 290 i 290X ponovno vrlo izjednačena.
Tomb Raider
|
|
| 1920×1200 (Ultimate) |
| 2x Nvidia GTX780 @ SLI |
| 127,3 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 TwinFrozr @ SLI |
| 108,7 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7990 |
| 101 |
|
|
|
| Gainward GTX690 |
| 87,9 |
|
|
|
| 2x AMD R9 270X |
| 83 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 75,1 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX780 DCU II OC |
| 70,9 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 69,5 |
|
|
|
| MSI R9 280X |
| 60,4 |
|
|
|
| MSI GTX770 Lightning |
| 59,6 |
|
|
|
| AMD HD7970 GHz |
| 57,7 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX770 DCU II OC |
| 56,7 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX680 DCUII |
| 49,5 |
|
|
|
| Asus GTX670 DCU Mini |
| 45,4 |
|
|
|
| ASUS R9 270X DCU II TOP |
| 43,8 |
|
|
|
| AMD R9 270X |
| 41,8 |
|
|
|
| ASUS GTX660Ti DCU II TOP |
| 40,9 |
|
|
|
| Gigabyte GTX580 SOC |
| 40,3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 2560×1440 (Ultimate) |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 53,5 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 51,2 |
|
|
|
| Nvidia GTX780 |
| 45,9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| 5760×1080 (Ultimate) |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 40,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 38,8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
Posljednji naslov danas, Tomb Raider laganu prednost daje GTX780 modelu na nižoj rezoluciji, dok mu na višoj ponestaje "sape" i tu 290 izlazi kao pobjednik.
Overclocking
|
|
| Hitman Absolution (1920×1200@VH) |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X @ OC |
| 78,25 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 @ OC |
| 76,08 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 72,52 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 68,32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Bioshock Infinite (1920×1200; Ultra@DDOF) |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X @ OC |
| 96,21 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 @ OC |
| 94,02 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 89,63 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 85,78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Sleeping Dogs (1920×1200@Extreme) |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X @ OC |
| 72,2 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 @ OC |
| 68,3 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 61,7 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 56,1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
| Tomb Raider (1920×1200@Ultimate) |
| AMD Radeon R9 290X @ OC |
| 84,8 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 @ OC |
| 81,3 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290X |
| 75,1 |
|
|
|
| AMD Radeon R9 290 |
| 69,5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
0 |
|
| |
U prva dva naslova porast performansi je oko 5 do 6%, a u druga dva čak oko 16 – 17%. Ovo objašnjavamo činjenicom kako kartica ima više overheada na druga dva naslova što se vidi i praćenjem potrošnje pa su i rezultati bolji, tj. manje je throtlanja.
Performanse u LuxxMarku su dosljedne i samim time vrlo dobre.
