OGLAS

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X & Ryzen 5 2600X recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 6 od 8

Rezultati testiranja – drugi dio

Grafičke performanse @ RX570

Deus Ex: Mankind DividedRyzen 5 2600X: 44,7Ryzen 5 2600X44,7Ryzen 7 1800X: 44,6Ryzen 7 1800X44,6Ryzen 7 2700X: 44Ryzen 7 2700X44049
HitmanRyzen 7 1800X: 73,99Ryzen 7 1800X73,99Ryzen 5 2600X: 72,39Ryzen 5 2600X72,39Ryzen 7 2700X: 72,26Ryzen 7 2700X72,26081
Total War: WarhammerRyzen 5 2600X: 78,7Ryzen 5 2600X78,7Ryzen 7 2700X: 78,6Ryzen 7 2700X78,6Ryzen 7 1800X: 74,1Ryzen 7 1800X74,1087
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War IIIRyzen 5 2600X: 85,77Ryzen 5 2600X85,77Ryzen 7 2700X: 81,01Ryzen 7 2700X81,01Ryzen 7 1800X: 78,31Ryzen 7 1800X78,31094

Grafičke smo performanse usporedili na dvije različite rezolucije (1080p i 1440p), te s dvije različite grafičke kartice. MSI-eva je RX570 poslužila za testiranje na nižoj rezoluciji U svim je ovim testovima Ryzen 5 2600X pokazao najbolje performanse, dok je 2700X konzistentan i ne zaostaje puno za njim. 1800X je u dva naslova pokazao kako se može nositi s novijim procesorima, a u dva zaostaje.

Grafičke performanse @ GTX1080Ti

Battlefield 1Core i7-8700K: 137Core i7-8700K137Ryzen 7 2700X: 137Ryzen 7 2700X137Ryzen 7 1800X: 135Ryzen 7 1800X135Ryzen 7 2600X: 135Ryzen 7 2600X1350151
Total War: WarhammerCore i7-8700K: 104Core i7-8700K104Ryzen 7 2600X: 99Ryzen 7 2600X99Ryzen 7 2700X: 97Ryzen 7 2700X97Ryzen 7 1800X: 94Ryzen 7 1800X940114
Far Cry 5Core i7-8700K: 104Core i7-8700K104Ryzen 7 2700X: 98Ryzen 7 2700X98Ryzen 7 2600X: 92Ryzen 7 2600X92Ryzen 7 1800X: 82Ryzen 7 1800X820114

Ovdje smo koristili dvije drugačije igre, te naravno GTX1080 Ti karticu, a uspjeli smo izvrtjeti i testove s Intelom i7-8700K. Vidimo kako je Core procesor i dalje na vrhu i AMD modeli ga ne mogu dostići, premda su oba brža od 1800X, što je posebno izraženo u slučaju Far Cry-a 5.

Porast performansi overclockingom

7-ZipRyzen 7 2700X @ OC: 49.888Ryzen 7 2700X @ OC49.888Ryzen 7 2700X: 48.030Ryzen 7 2700X48.030Ryzen 7 2600X @ OC: 39.069Ryzen 7 2600X @ OC39.069Ryzen 7 2600X: 37.676Ryzen 7 2600X37.676054.877
Cinebench 15Ryzen 7 2700X @ OC: 1.933Ryzen 7 2700X @ OC1.933Ryzen 7 2700X: 1.828Ryzen 7 2700X1.828Ryzen 7 2600X @ OC: 1.430Ryzen 7 2600X @ OC1.430Ryzen 7 2600X: 1.368Ryzen 7 2600X1.36802.126
TrueCrypt v7.1Ryzen 7 2700X @ OC: 11,4Ryzen 7 2700X @ OC11,4Ryzen 7 2700X: 11Ryzen 7 2700X11Ryzen 7 2600X @ OC: 8,6Ryzen 7 2600X @ OC8,6Ryzen 7 2600X: 8,3Ryzen 7 2600X8,3013
wPrime v2.10Ryzen 7 2700X @ OC: 89,682Ryzen 7 2700X @ OC89,682Ryzen 7 2700X: 95,624Ryzen 7 2700X95,624Ryzen 7 2600X @ OC: 121,001Ryzen 7 2600X @ OC121,001Ryzen 7 2600X: 126,752Ryzen 7 2600X126,7520139

Porast overclockingom je solidan no pitanje je koliko se isplati zbog povećane potrošnje i zagrijavanja, a u single threaded aplikacijama ipak malo gubimo jer nismo uspjeli prijeći 4.3 ili 4.35 GHz. MT performanse su ionako same po sebi odlične kod oba procesora.

Rezultati testiranja – drugi dio

Stranica 6 od 8

OGLAS