AMD Ryzen 7 5700X recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi w. Radeon RX 6800

PCMark 10Ryzen 9 5950X8.723,0Ryzen 7 5800X8.685,0Core i9-12900K8.644,0Core i3-12100F8.609,0Ryzen 7 5700X8.246,0Ryzen 5 5600X8.221,0Core i5-12600K7.924,009.595 3DMark TimeSpyCore i9-12900K16.282,0Core i5-12600K15.594,0Ryzen 9 5950X15.164,0Ryzen 7 5800X14.881,0Ryzen 7 5700X14.368,0Ryzen 5 5600X13.755,0Core i3-12100F13.368,0017.910 3DMark CPU profileRyzen 9 5950X12.119,0Core i9-12900K12.034,0Ryzen 7 5800X11.985,0Core i5-12600K8.235,0Ryzen 7 5700X7.867,0Ryzen 5 5600X5.390,0Core i3-12100F4.078,0013.331

PCMark 10 mjeri općenite performanse sistema, a 3DMark nam kombinirane performanse snage procesora i grafike. Testirali smo s novom grafičkom karticom u odnosu na prijašnje testove.

Po očekivanju, zbog spuštenih taktova 5700X je u PCMarku 10 slabiji od 5800X, no ipak je opasno blizu 5600X procesoru. Za utjehu, brži je od 12600K. U grafičkom testu ne zaostaje previše za 5800X, no sporiji je od 12600K, dok je u CPU profile malo slabiji od 12600K, te dosta od 5800X.

CPU testovi

Enkripcija podataka (AIDA64)

AIDA CPU AES (MB/s)Ryzen 9 5950X248.080,0Ryzen 7 5800X149.442,0Core i9-12900K140.651,0Core i5-12600K131.035,0Ryzen 7 5700X124.906,0Ryzen 5 5600X100.756,0Core i3-12100F63.656,0Core i9-10850K54.633,00272.888 AIDA CPU SHA3 (MB/s)Ryzen 9 5950X5.823,0Core i9-12900K5.144,0Core i9-10850K4.972,0Ryzen 7 5800X3.835,0Core i5-12600K3.649,0Ryzen 7 5700X3.075,0Ryzen 5 5600X2.512,0Core i3-12100F1.141,006.405

U testovima enkripcije je procesor tik ispod 12600K koji mu je glavni konkurent, te je dosta slabiji od 5800X.

Ray-trace test (AIDA64)

AIDA FP32 (Rays/s)Ryzen 9 5950X24.925,0Core i9-10850K20.999,0Ryzen 7 5800X17.929,0Core i5-12600K17.626,0Ryzen 7 5700X13.813,0Core i9-12900K13.376,0Ryzen 5 5600X11.752,0Core i3-12100F8.789,0027.418 AIDA FP64 (Rays/s)Ryzen 9 5950X12.728,0Core i9-10850K11.494,0Core i5-12600K9.666,0Ryzen 7 5800X9.602,0Core i9-12900K8.301,0Ryzen 7 5700X7.013,0Ryzen 5 5600X6.273,0Core i3-12100F4.860,0014.001

Ray-trace testove je dosta slabije odradio od 12600K, a za 5800X zaostaje debelo.

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-12900K88,7Ryzen 9 5950X116,5Ryzen 9 3950X121,8Core i5-12600K139,7Ryzen 9 5900X143,1Ryzen 9 3900XT156,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Core i9-10850K172,3Ryzen 7 5700X188,4Ryzen 7 5800X201,4Ryzen 7 3800XT202,4Core i7-10700K218,4Ryzen R7 3700X233,0Ryzen 7 2700X264,8Ryzen 5 5600X271,9i7-8700K283,4Core i3-12100F285,9Ryzen 7 1800X299,6Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K301,7Ryzen 5 3600X313,0Core i5-10400343,0Ryzen 5 2600X344,8i7-7800X355,1Core i5-10500357,5Ryzen 5 2600366,7i5-8600K406,60447

U Blenderu je iznenađujuće postigao bolji rezultat nego 5800X, no 12600K je ipak puno brži.

Cinebench R20

Cinebench 20 nTCore i9-12900K10.409,0Ryzen 9 5950X10.035,0Ryzen 9 3950X9.265,0Ryzen 9 5900X8.380,0Ryzen 9 3900XT7.302,0Ryzen 9 3900X7.237,0Core i5-10600K6.680,0Core i9-10850K6.164,0Ryzen 7 5800X6.001,0Ryzen 7 3800XT5.123,0Core i7-10700K4.936,0Ryzen 7 5700X4.928,0Ryzen 7 3700X4.916,0Ryzen 5 5600X4.351,0Ryzen 7 2700X3.857,0Core i5-10600K3.592,0Core i7-8700K3.408,0Ryzen 5 3600X3.369,0Core i3-12100F3.265,0Core i5-104003.147,0Core i5-105003.055,0Ryzen 3 3300X2.583,0Ryzen 3 31002.340,0011.450 Cinebench 20 1TCore i9-12900K744,0Core i5-12600K724,0Ryzen 9 5950X640,0Core i3-12100F629,0Ryzen 9 5900X628,0Ryzen 7 5800X624,0Ryzen 5 5600X595,0Ryzen 7 5700X543,0Ryzen 9 3900XT518,0Core i7-10700K512,0Core i9-10850K507,00818

U starijem Cinebenchu vidimo usporedbu s puno procesora, te vidimo da je u nT testu malo bolji od 10500 i 10400 procesora, no i ne puno sporiji od i5-10600K. Zašto je tome tako pokazuje single thread test gdje Golden Cove briljira. Nije kao jači Alder Lake procesori, no ima što za pokazati.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 23 nTCore i9-12900K27.259,0Ryzen 9 5950X23.653,0Core i5-12600K17.491,0Ryzen 7 5800X15.349,0Core i9-10850K15.175,0Ryzen 7 5700X12.652,0Ryzen 5 5600X10.218,0Core i3-12100F8.490,0029.985 Cinebench 23 1TCore i9-12900K1.988,0Core i5-12600K1.861,0Ryzen 7 5800X1.596,0Ryzen 9 5950X1.583,0Core i3-12100F1.582,0Ryzen 5 5600X1.529,0Ryzen 7 5700X1.443,0Core i9-10850K1.278,002.187

U novijem Cinebenchu je na dnu u nT testu što je i očekivano s obzirom na društvo u kojem je, no zato u single thread testu pokazuje zube.

Corona 1.3

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 5950X47,0Ryzen 9 5900X58,0Core i9-12900K59,0Ryzen 9 3950X61,0Ryzen 9 3900X72,0Ryzen 9 3900XT72,0Core i9-10850K76,0Core i5-12600K90,0Ryzen 7 5800X92,0Core i7-10700K96,0Ryzen 7 5700X101,0Ryzen 7 3800XT104,0Ryzen 7 3700X112,0Ryzen 7 2700X118,0Ryzen 5 5600X123,0Core i5-10600K134,0Core i7-8700K141,0Ryzen 5 3600X144,0Core i5-10500146,0Core i5-10400148,0Core i3-12100F172,0Ryzen 3 3300X202,0Ryzen 3 3100233,00256

U ovom je testu nešto slabiji od 10400 i 10500 modela što je zapravo i očekivano jer je riječ o 12T procesorima.

Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p

HandbrakeRyzen 9 5950X57,2Ryzen 7 5800X49,4Core i9-10850K49,2Ryzen 7 5700X43,9Ryzen 5 5600X38,6Core i9-12900K35,3Core i3-12100F32,3Core i5-12600K18,4063

Handbrake ne radi najbolje s novom Alder Lake arhitekturom pa je i rezultat tih procesora dosta loš. Ipak, iznenadit će vas da s 12100F možete jednako brzo transkodirati video kao i s 12900K.

JetStream 2

JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)Core i3-12100F230,4Core i9-12900K230,0Ryzen 7 5800X204,8Ryzen 9 5950X198,7Ryzen 9 5900X195,9Ryzen 5 5600X192,4Core i9-10850K176,9Core i7-10700K161,3Ryzen 9 3900X156,0Ryzen 7 3800XT154,7Ryzen 9 3900XT152,8Ryzen 3 3300X149,6Core i5-12600K149,3Core i5-10600K148,7Ryzen 7 5700X147,7Core i5-10500141,5Core i7-8700K140,8Core i5-10400137,2Ryzen 3 3100127,10253

JetStream 2 je browser benchmark koji se fokusira na web aplikacije, koji kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. U ovom testu maleni procesor briljira pa je za web savršen.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)Core i9-12900K27.559,0Ryzen 9 5950X27.384,0Core i5-12600K17.516,0Ryzen 7 5800X17.040,0Core i9-10850K16.808,0Ryzen 7 5700X14.436,0Ryzen 5 5600X11.589,0Core i3-12100F9.400,0030.315

Očekivano najslabiji rezultat u ovom testu.

wPrime 2.0

wPrime 2.0Ryzen Threadripper 3970X23,9Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX31,6Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX38,6Ryzen 9 3950X42,4Ryzen 9 5950X45,9Ryzen Threadripper 2950X49,2Core i9-12900K52,2Threadripper 1950X54,1Ryzen Threadripper 2920X56,1Ryzen 9 3900X56,4Ryzen 9 3900XT56,5Ryzen 9 5900X60,0Threadripper 1920X62,6Core i9-10850K68,0i7-6950X69,2Core i5-12600K79,7Ryzen 7 3800XT80,1Ryzen R7 3700X82,8Core i7-10700K85,3Ryzen 7 5800X86,6Ryzen 7 2700X86,9Ryzen 7 1800X95,6Ryzen 7 5700X97,3i7-8700K103,9Ryzen 7 1700X106,9Ryzen 7 2700108,3i7-5960X110,6Ryzen 5 3600X113,3Ryzen 5 5600X116,4Ryzen 7 1700116,9Core i5-10600K118,7i7-7800X121,4Ryzen 5 2600X126,2Ryzen 5 2600126,8i7-4960X129,6Core i5-10500131,3Core i5-10400133,3i7-3960X135,1i7-5930K135,4Ryzen 5 1600X136,3i7-5820K138,7Ryzen 5 1600140,2i7-3930K149,9Core i3-12100F157,2Ryzen 3 3300X158,6i5-8600K164,6i7-7700K167,4i7-6700K175,4i7-4790K176,0Ryzen 3 3100178,3i7-4770K186,5i7-3770K195,2Ryzen 5 1500X198,1i7-2600K213,5Ryzen 5 1400225,0FX-8150237,50261

Solidan, no ne i sjajan rezultat za ovaj procesor. Naime, dosta zaostaje za 10500 modelom. Istina, on podržava 4 threada više, no Alder Lake ipak ima superiorne single thread rezultate – ipak, nije ih ulovio kao u nekim drugim testovima.