ASRock B660M Steel Legend & Intel Core i3-12100F recenzija

· · MBO i RAM · Stranica 4 od 7

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi w. Radeon RX 6800

PCMark 10Ryzen 9 5950X8.723,0Ryzen 5 5800X8.685,0Core i9-12900K8.644,0Core i3-12100F8.609,0Ryzen 5 5600X8.221,0Core i5-12600K7.924,009.595 3DMark TimeSpyCore i9-12900K16.282,0Core i5-12600K15.594,0Ryzen 9 5950X15.164,0Ryzen 5 5800X14.881,0Ryzen 5 5600X13.755,0Core i3-12100F13.368,0017.910 3DMark CPU profileRyzen 9 5950X12.119,0Core i9-12900K12.034,0Ryzen 5 5800X11.985,0Core i5-12600K8.235,0Ryzen 5 5600X5.390,0Core i3-12100F4.078,0013.331

PCMark 10 mjeri općenite performanse sistema, a 3DMark nam kombinirane performanse snage procesora i grafike. Testirali smo s novom grafičkom karticom u odnosu na prijašnje testove.

U PCMarku 10 je 12100F za divno čudo postigao bolji rezultat nego 12600K koji je dosta podbacio, a ni 12900K mu nije daleko odmakao. Kada je u pitanju grafički test, tu je ipak najslabiji, baš kao i kod CPU profile testa.

CPU testovi

Enkripcija podataka (AIDA64)

AIDA CPU AES (MB/s)Ryzen 9 5950X248.080,0Ryzen 7 5800X149.442,0Core i9-12900K140.651,0Core i5-12600K131.035,0Ryzen 5 5600X100.756,0Core i3-12100F63.656,0Core i9-10850K54.633,00272.888 AIDA CPU SHA3 (MB/s)Ryzen 9 5950X5.823,0Core i9-12900K5.144,0Core i9-10850K4.972,0Ryzen 7 5800X3.835,0Core i5-12600K3.649,0Ryzen 5 5600X2.512,0Core i3-12100F1.141,006.405

Kod testova enkripcije je 12600K solidan, pa se čak u SHA3 dosta približava procesoru 5800X.

Ray-trace test (AIDA64)

AIDA FP32 (Rays/s)Ryzen 9 5950X24.925,0Core i9-10850K20.999,0Ryzen 7 5800X17.929,0Core i5-12600K17.626,0Core i9-12900K13.376,0Ryzen 5 5600X11.752,0Core i3-12100F8.789,0027.418 AIDA FP64 (Rays/s)Ryzen 9 5950X12.728,0Core i9-10850K11.494,0Core i5-12600K9.666,0Ryzen 7 5800X9.602,0Core i9-12900K8.301,0Ryzen 5 5600X6.273,0Core i3-12100F4.860,0014.001

U svim ovim CPU testovima ipak se vidi da procesor nije iz višeg, nego iz nižeg segmenta tržišta. Ako tražite procesor za brzo izvršavanje kompleksnijih zadataka, ovaj nije za vas.

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-12900K88,7Ryzen 9 5950X116,5Ryzen 9 3950X121,8Core i5-12600K139,7Ryzen 9 5900X143,1Ryzen 9 3900XT156,6Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Core i9-10850K172,3Ryzen 7 5800X201,4Ryzen 7 3800XT202,4Core i7-10700K218,4Ryzen R7 3700X233,0Ryzen 7 2700X264,8Ryzen 5 5600X271,9i7-8700K283,4Core i3-12100F285,9Ryzen 7 1800X299,6Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K301,7Ryzen 5 3600X313,0Core i5-10400343,0Ryzen 5 2600X344,8i7-7800X355,1Core i5-10500357,5Ryzen 5 2600366,7i5-8600K406,60447

U Blenderu se pokazao solidnim, gdje imamo i rezultate nekih slabijih procesora. No, najviše iznenađuje da je potukao primjerice Ryzena 7 2700, pa i5-10600K ili pak i7-7800X. To dovoljno govori da je Golden Cave arhitektura pun pogodak.

Cinebench R20

Cinebench 20 nTCore i9-12900K10.409,0Ryzen 9 5950X10.035,0Ryzen 9 3950X9.265,0Ryzen 9 5900X8.380,0Ryzen 9 3900XT7.302,0Ryzen 9 3900X7.237,0Core i5-10600K6.680,0Core i9-10850K6.164,0Ryzen 7 5800X6.001,0Ryzen 7 3800XT5.123,0Core i7-10700K4.936,0Ryzen 7 3700X4.916,0Ryzen 5 5600X4.351,0Ryzen 7 2700X3.857,0Core i5-10600K3.592,0Core i7-8700K3.408,0Ryzen 5 3600X3.369,0Core i3-12100F3.265,0Core i5-104003.147,0Core i5-105003.055,0Ryzen 3 3300X2.583,0Ryzen 3 31002.340,0011.450 Cinebench 20 1TCore i9-12900K744,0Core i5-12600K724,0Ryzen 9 5950X640,0Core i3-12100F629,0Ryzen 9 5900X628,0Ryzen 7 5800X624,0Ryzen 5 5600X595,0Ryzen 9 3900XT518,0Core i7-10700K512,0Core i9-10850K507,00818

U starijem Cinebenchu vidimo usporedbu s puno procesora, te vidimo da je u nT testu malo bolji od 10500 i 10400 procesora, no i ne puno sporiji od i5-10600K. Zašto je tome tako pokazuje single thread test gdje Golden Cove briljira. Nije kao jači Alder Lake procesori, no ima što za pokazati.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 23 nTCore i9-12900K27.259,0Ryzen 9 5950X23.653,0Core i5-12600K17.491,0Ryzen 7 5800X15.349,0Core i9-10850K15.175,0Ryzen 5 5600X10.218,0Core i3-12100F8.490,0029.985 Cinebench 23 1TCore i9-12900K1.988,0Core i5-12600K1.861,0Ryzen 7 5800X1.596,0Ryzen 9 5950X1.583,0Core i3-12100F1.582,0Ryzen 5 5600X1.529,0Core i9-10850K1.278,002.187

U novijem Cinebenchu je na dnu u nT testu što je i očekivano s obzirom na društvo u kojem je, no zato u single thread testu pokazuje zube.

Corona 1.3

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 5950X47,0Ryzen 9 5900X58,0Core i9-12900K59,0Ryzen 9 3950X61,0Ryzen 9 3900X72,0Ryzen 9 3900XT72,0Core i9-10850K76,0Core i5-12600K90,0Ryzen 7 5800X92,0Core i7-10700K96,0Ryzen 7 3800XT104,0Ryzen 7 3700X112,0Ryzen 7 2700X118,0Ryzen 5 5600X123,0Core i5-10600K134,0Core i7-8700K141,0Ryzen 5 3600X144,0Core i5-10500146,0Core i5-10400148,0Core i3-12100F172,0Ryzen 3 3300X202,0Ryzen 3 3100233,00256

U ovom je testu nešto slabiji od 10400 i 10500 modela što je zapravo i očekivano jer je riječ o 12T procesorima.

Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p

HandbrakeRyzen 9 5950X57,2Ryzen 7 5800X49,4Core i9-10850K49,2Ryzen 5 5600X38,6Core i9-12900K35,3Core i3-12100F32,3Core i5-12600K18,4063

Handbrake ne radi najbolje s novom Alder Lake arhitekturom pa je i rezultat tih procesora dosta loš. Ipak, iznenadit će vas da s 12100F možete jednako brzo transkodirati video kao i s 12900K.

JetStream 2

JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)Core i3-12100F230,4Core i9-12900K230,0Ryzen 7 5800X204,8Ryzen 9 5950X198,7Ryzen 9 5900X195,9Ryzen 5 5600X192,4Core i9-10850K176,9Core i7-10700K161,3Ryzen 9 3900X156,0Ryzen 7 3800XT154,7Ryzen 9 3900XT152,8Ryzen 3 3300X149,6Core i5-12600K149,3Core i5-10600K148,7Core i5-10500141,5Core i7-8700K140,8Core i5-10400137,2Ryzen 3 3100127,10253

JetStream 2 je browser benchmark koji se fokusira na web aplikacije, koji kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. U ovom testu maleni procesor briljira pa je za web savršen.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)Core i9-12900K27.559,0Ryzen 9 5950X27.384,0Core i5-12600K17.516,0Ryzen 7 5800X17.040,0Core i9-10850K16.808,0Ryzen 5 5600X11.589,0Core i3-12100F9.400,0030.315

Očekivano najslabiji rezultat u ovom testu.

wPrime 2.0

wPrime 2.0Ryzen Threadripper 3970X23,9Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX31,6Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX38,6Ryzen 9 3950X42,4Ryzen 9 5950X45,9Ryzen Threadripper 2950X49,2Core i9-12900K52,2Threadripper 1950X54,1Ryzen Threadripper 2920X56,1Ryzen 9 3900X56,4Ryzen 9 3900XT56,5Ryzen 9 5900X60,0Threadripper 1920X62,6Core i9-10850K68,0i7-6950X69,2Core i5-12600K79,7Ryzen 7 3800XT80,1Ryzen R7 3700X82,8Core i7-10700K85,3Ryzen 7 5800X86,6Ryzen 7 2700X86,9Ryzen 7 1800X95,6i7-8700K103,9Ryzen 7 1700X106,9Ryzen 7 2700108,3i7-5960X110,6Ryzen 5 3600X113,3Ryzen 5 5600X116,4Ryzen 7 1700116,9Core i5-10600K118,7i7-7800X121,4Ryzen 5 2600X126,2Ryzen 5 2600126,8i7-4960X129,6Core i5-10500131,3Core i5-10400133,3i7-3960X135,1i7-5930K135,4Ryzen 5 1600X136,3i7-5820K138,7Ryzen 5 1600140,2i7-3930K149,9Core i3-12100F157,2Ryzen 3 3300X158,6i5-8600K164,6i7-7700K167,4i7-6700K175,4i7-4790K176,0Ryzen 3 3100178,3i7-4770K186,5i7-3770K195,2Ryzen 5 1500X198,1i7-2600K213,5Ryzen 5 1400225,0FX-8150237,50261

Solidan, no ne i sjajan rezultat za ovaj procesor. Naime, dosta zaostaje za 10500 modelom. Istina, on podržava 4 threada više, no Alder Lake ipak ima superiorne single thread rezultate – ipak, nije ih ulovio kao u nekim drugim testovima.