OGLAS

ASRock B660M Steel Legend & Intel Core i3-12100F recenzija

· · MBO i RAM · Stranica 4 od 7

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi w. Radeon RX 6800

PCMark 10Ryzen 9 5950X: 8.723Ryzen 9 5950X8.723Ryzen 5 5800X: 8.685Ryzen 5 5800X8.685Core i9-12900K: 8.644Core i9-12900K8.644Core i3-12100F: 8.609Core i3-12100F8.609Ryzen 5 5600X: 8.221Ryzen 5 5600X8.221Core i5-12600K: 7.924Core i5-12600K7.92409.595
3DMark TimeSpyCore i9-12900K: 16.282Core i9-12900K16.282Core i5-12600K: 15.594Core i5-12600K15.594Ryzen 9 5950X: 15.164Ryzen 9 5950X15.164Ryzen 5 5800X: 14.881Ryzen 5 5800X14.881Ryzen 5 5600X: 13.755Ryzen 5 5600X13.755Core i3-12100F: 13.368Core i3-12100F13.368017.910
3DMark CPU profileRyzen 9 5950X: 12.119Ryzen 9 5950X12.119Core i9-12900K: 12.034Core i9-12900K12.034Ryzen 5 5800X: 11.985Ryzen 5 5800X11.985Core i5-12600K: 8.235Core i5-12600K8.235Ryzen 5 5600X: 5.390Ryzen 5 5600X5.390Core i3-12100F: 4.078Core i3-12100F4.078013.331

PCMark 10 mjeri općenite performanse sistema, a 3DMark nam kombinirane performanse snage procesora i grafike. Testirali smo s novom grafičkom karticom u odnosu na prijašnje testove.

U PCMarku 10 je 12100F za divno čudo postigao bolji rezultat nego 12600K koji je dosta podbacio, a ni 12900K mu nije daleko odmakao. Kada je u pitanju grafički test, tu je ipak najslabiji, baš kao i kod CPU profile testa.

CPU testovi

Enkripcija podataka (AIDA64)

AIDA CPU AES (MB/s)Ryzen 9 5950X: 248.080Ryzen 9 5950X248.080Ryzen 7 5800X: 149.442Ryzen 7 5800X149.442Core i9-12900K: 140.651Core i9-12900K140.651Core i5-12600K: 131.035Core i5-12600K131.035Ryzen 5 5600X: 100.756Ryzen 5 5600X100.756Core i3-12100F: 63.656Core i3-12100F63.656Core i9-10850K: 54.633Core i9-10850K54.6330272.888
AIDA CPU SHA3 (MB/s)Ryzen 9 5950X: 5.823Ryzen 9 5950X5.823Core i9-12900K: 5.144Core i9-12900K5.144Core i9-10850K: 4.972Core i9-10850K4.972Ryzen 7 5800X: 3.835Ryzen 7 5800X3.835Core i5-12600K: 3.649Core i5-12600K3.649Ryzen 5 5600X: 2.512Ryzen 5 5600X2.512Core i3-12100F: 1.141Core i3-12100F1.14106.405

Kod testova enkripcije je 12600K solidan, pa se čak u SHA3 dosta približava procesoru 5800X.

Ray-trace test (AIDA64)

AIDA FP32 (Rays/s)Ryzen 9 5950X: 24.925Ryzen 9 5950X24.925Core i9-10850K: 20.999Core i9-10850K20.999Ryzen 7 5800X: 17.929Ryzen 7 5800X17.929Core i5-12600K: 17.626Core i5-12600K17.626Core i9-12900K: 13.376Core i9-12900K13.376Ryzen 5 5600X: 11.752Ryzen 5 5600X11.752Core i3-12100F: 8.789Core i3-12100F8.789027.418
AIDA FP64 (Rays/s)Ryzen 9 5950X: 12.728Ryzen 9 5950X12.728Core i9-10850K: 11.494Core i9-10850K11.494Core i5-12600K: 9.666Core i5-12600K9.666Ryzen 7 5800X: 9.602Ryzen 7 5800X9.602Core i9-12900K: 8.301Core i9-12900K8.301Ryzen 5 5600X: 6.273Ryzen 5 5600X6.273Core i3-12100F: 4.860Core i3-12100F4.860014.001

U svim ovim CPU testovima ipak se vidi da procesor nije iz višeg, nego iz nižeg segmenta tržišta. Ako tražite procesor za brzo izvršavanje kompleksnijih zadataka, ovaj nije za vas.

Blender

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Core i9-12900K: 88,72Core i9-12900K88,72Ryzen 9 5950X: 116,49Ryzen 9 5950X116,49Ryzen 9 3950X: 121,84Ryzen 9 3950X121,84Core i5-12600K: 139,65Core i5-12600K139,65Ryzen 9 5900X: 143,12Ryzen 9 5900X143,12Ryzen 9 3900XT: 156,62Ryzen 9 3900XT156,62Ryzen 9 3900X: 157,37Ryzen 9 3900X157,37Core i9-10850K: 172,34Core i9-10850K172,34Ryzen 7 5800X: 201,36Ryzen 7 5800X201,36Ryzen 7 3800XT: 202,42Ryzen 7 3800XT202,42Core i7-10700K: 218,38Core i7-10700K218,38Ryzen R7 3700X: 232,95Ryzen R7 3700X232,95Ryzen 7 2700X: 264,82Ryzen 7 2700X264,82Ryzen 5 5600X: 271,89Ryzen 5 5600X271,89i7-8700K: 283,41i7-8700K283,41Core i3-12100F: 285,91Core i3-12100F285,91Ryzen 7 1800X: 299,64Ryzen 7 1800X299,64Ryzen 7 2700: 301,5Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K: 301,74Core i5-10600K301,74Ryzen 5 3600X: 312,96Ryzen 5 3600X312,96Core i5-10400: 342,96Core i5-10400342,96Ryzen 5 2600X: 344,84Ryzen 5 2600X344,84i7-7800X: 355,05i7-7800X355,05Core i5-10500: 357,47Core i5-10500357,47Ryzen 5 2600: 366,65Ryzen 5 2600366,65i5-8600K: 406,55i5-8600K406,550447

U Blenderu se pokazao solidnim, gdje imamo i rezultate nekih slabijih procesora. No, najviše iznenađuje da je potukao primjerice Ryzena 7 2700, pa i5-10600K ili pak i7-7800X. To dovoljno govori da je Golden Cave arhitektura pun pogodak.

Cinebench R20

Cinebench 20 nTCore i9-12900K: 10.409Core i9-12900K10.409Ryzen 9 5950X: 10.035Ryzen 9 5950X10.035Ryzen 9 3950X: 9.265Ryzen 9 3950X9.265Ryzen 9 5900X: 8.380Ryzen 9 5900X8.380Ryzen 9 3900XT: 7.302Ryzen 9 3900XT7.302Ryzen 9 3900X: 7.237Ryzen 9 3900X7.237Core i5-10600K: 6.680Core i5-10600K6.680Core i9-10850K: 6.164Core i9-10850K6.164Ryzen 7 5800X: 6.001Ryzen 7 5800X6.001Ryzen 7 3800XT: 5.123Ryzen 7 3800XT5.123Core i7-10700K: 4.936Core i7-10700K4.936Ryzen 7 3700X: 4.916Ryzen 7 3700X4.916Ryzen 5 5600X: 4.351Ryzen 5 5600X4.351Ryzen 7 2700X: 3.857Ryzen 7 2700X3.857Core i5-10600K: 3.592Core i5-10600K3.592Core i7-8700K: 3.408Core i7-8700K3.408Ryzen 5 3600X: 3.369Ryzen 5 3600X3.369Core i3-12100F: 3.265Core i3-12100F3.265Core i5-10400: 3.147Core i5-104003.147Core i5-10500: 3.055Core i5-105003.055Ryzen 3 3300X: 2.583Ryzen 3 3300X2.583Ryzen 3 3100: 2.340Ryzen 3 31002.340011.450
Cinebench 20 1TCore i9-12900K: 744Core i9-12900K744Core i5-12600K: 724Core i5-12600K724Ryzen 9 5950X: 640Ryzen 9 5950X640Core i3-12100F: 629Core i3-12100F629Ryzen 9 5900X: 628Ryzen 9 5900X628Ryzen 7 5800X: 624Ryzen 7 5800X624Ryzen 5 5600X: 595Ryzen 5 5600X595Ryzen 9 3900XT: 518Ryzen 9 3900XT518Core i7-10700K: 512Core i7-10700K512Core i9-10850K: 507Core i9-10850K5070818

U starijem Cinebenchu vidimo usporedbu s puno procesora, te vidimo da je u nT testu malo bolji od 10500 i 10400 procesora, no i ne puno sporiji od i5-10600K. Zašto je tome tako pokazuje single thread test gdje Golden Cove briljira. Nije kao jači Alder Lake procesori, no ima što za pokazati.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench 23 nTCore i9-12900K: 27.259Core i9-12900K27.259Ryzen 9 5950X: 23.653Ryzen 9 5950X23.653Core i5-12600K: 17.491Core i5-12600K17.491Ryzen 7 5800X: 15.349Ryzen 7 5800X15.349Core i9-10850K: 15.175Core i9-10850K15.175Ryzen 5 5600X: 10.218Ryzen 5 5600X10.218Core i3-12100F: 8.490Core i3-12100F8.490029.985
Cinebench 23 1TCore i9-12900K: 1.988Core i9-12900K1.988Core i5-12600K: 1.861Core i5-12600K1.861Ryzen 7 5800X: 1.596Ryzen 7 5800X1.596Ryzen 9 5950X: 1.583Ryzen 9 5950X1.583Core i3-12100F: 1.582Core i3-12100F1.582Ryzen 5 5600X: 1.529Ryzen 5 5600X1.529Core i9-10850K: 1.278Core i9-10850K1.27802.187

U novijem Cinebenchu je na dnu u nT testu što je i očekivano s obzirom na društvo u kojem je, no zato u single thread testu pokazuje zube.

Corona 1.3

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 5950X: 47Ryzen 9 5950X47Ryzen 9 5900X: 58Ryzen 9 5900X58Core i9-12900K: 59Core i9-12900K59Ryzen 9 3950X: 61Ryzen 9 3950X61Ryzen 9 3900X: 72Ryzen 9 3900X72Ryzen 9 3900XT: 72Ryzen 9 3900XT72Core i9-10850K: 76Core i9-10850K76Core i5-12600K: 90Core i5-12600K90Ryzen 7 5800X: 92Ryzen 7 5800X92Core i7-10700K: 96Core i7-10700K96Ryzen 7 3800XT: 104Ryzen 7 3800XT104Ryzen 7 3700X: 112Ryzen 7 3700X112Ryzen 7 2700X: 118Ryzen 7 2700X118Ryzen 5 5600X: 123Ryzen 5 5600X123Core i5-10600K: 134Core i5-10600K134Core i7-8700K: 141Core i7-8700K141Ryzen 5 3600X: 144Ryzen 5 3600X144Core i5-10500: 146Core i5-10500146Core i5-10400: 148Core i5-10400148Core i3-12100F: 172Core i3-12100F172Ryzen 3 3300X: 202Ryzen 3 3300X202Ryzen 3 3100: 233Ryzen 3 31002330256

U ovom je testu nešto slabiji od 10400 i 10500 modela što je zapravo i očekivano jer je riječ o 12T procesorima.

Handbrake transcode 4K to 1080p

HandbrakeRyzen 9 5950X: 57,2Ryzen 9 5950X57,2Ryzen 7 5800X: 49,38Ryzen 7 5800X49,38Core i9-10850K: 49,16Core i9-10850K49,16Ryzen 5 5600X: 38,64Ryzen 5 5600X38,64Core i9-12900K: 35,3Core i9-12900K35,3Core i3-12100F: 32,28Core i3-12100F32,28Core i5-12600K: 18,4Core i5-12600K18,4063

Handbrake ne radi najbolje s novom Alder Lake arhitekturom pa je i rezultat tih procesora dosta loš. Ipak, iznenadit će vas da s 12100F možete jednako brzo transkodirati video kao i s 12900K.

JetStream 2

JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)Core i3-12100F: 230,373Core i3-12100F230,373Core i9-12900K: 229,982Core i9-12900K229,982Ryzen 7 5800X: 204,78Ryzen 7 5800X204,78Ryzen 9 5950X: 198,742Ryzen 9 5950X198,742Ryzen 9 5900X: 195,904Ryzen 9 5900X195,904Ryzen 5 5600X: 192,449Ryzen 5 5600X192,449Core i9-10850K: 176,918Core i9-10850K176,918Core i7-10700K: 161,32Core i7-10700K161,32Ryzen 9 3900X: 156Ryzen 9 3900X156Ryzen 7 3800XT: 154,69Ryzen 7 3800XT154,69Ryzen 9 3900XT: 152,847Ryzen 9 3900XT152,847Ryzen 3 3300X: 149,55Ryzen 3 3300X149,55Core i5-12600K: 149,33Core i5-12600K149,33Core i5-10600K: 148,66Core i5-10600K148,66Core i5-10500: 141,54Core i5-10500141,54Core i7-8700K: 140,77Core i7-8700K140,77Core i5-10400: 137,226Core i5-10400137,226Ryzen 3 3100: 127,09Ryzen 3 3100127,090253

JetStream 2 je browser benchmark koji se fokusira na web aplikacije, koji kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. U ovom testu maleni procesor briljira pa je za web savršen.

V-Ray

V-Ray Benchmark 4.10.03 (ksamples)Core i9-12900K: 27.559Core i9-12900K27.559Ryzen 9 5950X: 27.384Ryzen 9 5950X27.384Core i5-12600K: 17.516Core i5-12600K17.516Ryzen 7 5800X: 17.040Ryzen 7 5800X17.040Core i9-10850K: 16.808Core i9-10850K16.808Ryzen 5 5600X: 11.589Ryzen 5 5600X11.589Core i3-12100F: 9.400Core i3-12100F9.400030.315

Očekivano najslabiji rezultat u ovom testu.

wPrime 2.0

wPrime 2.0Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: 23,91Ryzen Threadripper 3970X23,91Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: 31,56Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX31,56Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX: 38,556Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX38,556Ryzen 9 3950X: 42,36Ryzen 9 3950X42,36Ryzen 9 5950X: 45,9Ryzen 9 5950X45,9Ryzen Threadripper 2950X: 49,234Ryzen Threadripper 2950X49,234Core i9-12900K: 52,179Core i9-12900K52,179Threadripper 1950X: 54,145Threadripper 1950X54,145Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: 56,142Ryzen Threadripper 2920X56,142Ryzen 9 3900X: 56,412Ryzen 9 3900X56,412Ryzen 9 3900XT: 56,456Ryzen 9 3900XT56,456Ryzen 9 5900X: 59,96Ryzen 9 5900X59,96Threadripper 1920X: 62,553Threadripper 1920X62,553Core i9-10850K: 67,975Core i9-10850K67,975i7-6950X: 69,205i7-6950X69,205Core i5-12600K: 79,67Core i5-12600K79,67Ryzen 7 3800XT: 80,08Ryzen 7 3800XT80,08Ryzen R7 3700X: 82,79Ryzen R7 3700X82,79Core i7-10700K: 85,27Core i7-10700K85,27Ryzen 7 5800X: 86,58Ryzen 7 5800X86,58Ryzen 7 2700X: 86,854Ryzen 7 2700X86,854Ryzen 7 1800X: 95,624Ryzen 7 1800X95,624i7-8700K: 103,919i7-8700K103,919Ryzen 7 1700X: 106,855Ryzen 7 1700X106,855Ryzen 7 2700: 108,265Ryzen 7 2700108,265i7-5960X: 110,626i7-5960X110,626Ryzen 5 3600X: 113,335Ryzen 5 3600X113,335Ryzen 5 5600X: 116,435Ryzen 5 5600X116,435Ryzen 7 1700: 116,929Ryzen 7 1700116,929Core i5-10600K: 118,65Core i5-10600K118,65i7-7800X: 121,355i7-7800X121,355Ryzen 5 2600X: 126,153Ryzen 5 2600X126,153Ryzen 5 2600: 126,752Ryzen 5 2600126,752i7-4960X: 129,637i7-4960X129,637Core i5-10500: 131,25Core i5-10500131,25Core i5-10400: 133,254Core i5-10400133,254i7-3960X: 135,127i7-3960X135,127i7-5930K: 135,435i7-5930K135,435Ryzen 5 1600X: 136,293Ryzen 5 1600X136,293i7-5820K: 138,705i7-5820K138,705Ryzen 5 1600: 140,245Ryzen 5 1600140,245i7-3930K: 149,89i7-3930K149,89Core i3-12100F: 157,223Core i3-12100F157,223Ryzen 3 3300X: 158,55Ryzen 3 3300X158,55i5-8600K: 164,566i5-8600K164,566i7-7700K: 167,364i7-7700K167,364i7-6700K: 175,439i7-6700K175,439i7-4790K: 176,008i7-4790K176,008Ryzen 3 3100: 178,347Ryzen 3 3100178,347i7-4770K: 186,468i7-4770K186,468i7-3770K: 195,174i7-3770K195,174Ryzen 5 1500X: 198,092Ryzen 5 1500X198,092i7-2600K: 213,481i7-2600K213,481Ryzen 5 1400: 225Ryzen 5 1400225FX-8150: 237,491FX-8150237,4910261

Solidan, no ne i sjajan rezultat za ovaj procesor. Naime, dosta zaostaje za 10500 modelom. Istina, on podržava 4 threada više, no Alder Lake ipak ima superiorne single thread rezultate – ipak, nije ih ulovio kao u nekim drugim testovima.

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

Stranica 4 od 7

OGLAS