ASUS TUF Gaming X870-PLUS WiFi recenzija

· · MBO i RAM · Stranica 4 od 5

Rezultati testiranja

UL test

PCMark 10Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X10.894,0Asus ProArt X870E-Creator WiFi10.732,0ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E Gaming WiFi10.725,0Gigabyte X870E Aorus Pro10.610,0Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master10.327,0Asus TUF Gaming X870-PLUS WiFi10.324,0011.983 3DMark CPU profileGigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X17.833,0ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E Gaming WiFi17.809,0Gigabyte X870E Aorus Pro17.788,0Asus ProArt X870E-Creator WiFi17.635,0Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master17.550,0Asus TUF Gaming X870-PLUS WiFi17.501,0019.616

U oba je testa X870-PLUS na dnu grafa i s najslabijim performansama, no razlike nisu tako velike da bi to korisnik i osjetio.

Blender

Gooseberry Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Gigabyte X870E Aorus Pro244,3ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E Gaming WiFi246,3Asus ProArt X870E-Creator WiFi246,1Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X246,3Asus TUF Gaming X870-PLUS WiFi246,8Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master247,10272

Opet su performanse slabije i pri dnu grafa. No, razlike ionako nisu velike da će vam faliti performansi.

Cinebench R24

Cinebench 24 nTASUS ROG Strix X870E-E Gaming WiFi2.242,0Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X2.225,0Gigabyte X870E Aorus Pro2.214,0Asus ProArt X870E-Creator WiFi2.210,0Asus TUF Gaming X870-PLUS WiFi2.190,0Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master2.175,002.466 Cinebench 24 1TAsus ProArt X870E-Creator WiFi137,0ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E Gaming WiFi137,0Gigabyte X870E Aorus Pro136,0Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X134,0Asus TUF Gaming X870-PLUS WiFi132,0Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master130,00151

Performanse su pri dnu grafa za oba testa.

Zagrijavanje procesora @ Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora LT360 HPE

TemperatureAsus TUF Gaming X870-PLUS WiFi88,6Asus ProArt X870E-Creator WiFi88,7Gigabyte X870E Aorus Pro88,9Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master89,1ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E Gaming WiFi89,2Gigabyte X670E Aorus Pro X99,80110

Zagrijavanje je slično kao i kod ostalih X870E ploča.

Porast performansi PBO overclockingom

3DMark CPU profile9950X @ PBO18.088,09950X @ Stock17.501,0019.897 Gooseberry Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)9950X @ PBO244,09950X @ Stock246,80271 Cinebench 24 nT9950X @ PBO2.308,09950X @ Stock2.190,002.539 Cinebench 24 1T9950X @ PBO138,09950X @ Stock132,00152

Početne performanse su mrvicu slabije, pa overclockingom dolazimo do sasvim respektabilnih broji. Porast nije ogroman, ali veseli.