Intel Core i7-10700K recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 3 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – prvi dio

UL testovi

PCMark 10Core i7-10700K6.346,0Ryzen 9 3950X6.249,0Ryzen 9 3900X6.222,0Ryzen 7 3800XT6.129,0Core i5-10600K6.067,0Ryzen 5 3600X5.976,0Ryzen 3 3300X5.753,0Core i5-105005.610,0Ryzen 7 2700X5.523,0Core i5-104005.513,0Ryzen 3 31005.085,006.981 3DMark TimeSpyCore i7-10700K9.537,0Ryzen 9 3950X9.478,0Ryzen 9 3900X9.337,0Ryzen 7 3800XT9.258,0Core i5-105008.946,0Core i5-10600K8.897,0Core i5-104008.747,0Ryzen 3 3300X8.332,0Ryzen 3 31008.166,0010.491

PCMark 10 mjeri općenite performanse sistema, a 3DMark nam kombinirane performanse snage procesora i grafike. PCMark rezultat je na vrhu, visoki radni takt je rezultirao rezultatom koji nadmašuje i onaj 12-jezgrenog Ryzena 9 3950X i to za skoro stotinjak bodova. Isto tako, i Time Spy rezultat je izvrstan i na samom vrhu, bit će zanimljivo vidjeti kako će se to odraziti na rezultate u igrama.

CPU testovi

7-ZIPRyzen 9 3950X132.846,0Ryzen 9 3900X110.418,0Ryzen 7 3800XT81.305,0Core i7-10700K71.450,0Ryzen 7 3700X56.540,0Core i5-10600K56.338,0Core i5-1050052.333,0Core i5-1040050.744,0i7-6950X50.375,0Ryzen 7 2700X48.030,0Ryzen 7 270042.859,0Ryzen 7 1800X41.197,0i7-8700K40.613,0i7-5960X40.065,0Ryzen 7 1700X39.010,0Ryzen 5 2600X37.676,0i7-7800X37.543,0Ryzen 7 170036.906,0i7-4960X35.921,0i7-3960X34.371,0Ryzen 5 260033.967,0i7-5930K32.228,0Ryzen 5 1600X32.093,0Ryzen 3 3300X31.909,0i7-5820K31.261,0Ryzen 5 160031.200,0i7-980X29.058,0i7-3930K28.938,0Ryzen 3 310028.569,0i7-7700K28.583,0i5-8600K28.294,0i7-6700K26.328,0i7-4790K26.327,0i7-3770K24.437,0i7-4770K23.564,0Ryzen 5 1500X22.909,0Ryzen 5 2400G21.251,0FX-815020.957,0i7-2600K20.101,0Ryzen 5 140020.016,0i5-4690K18.528,0i5-6600K18.155,0i5-4670K17.203,0i5-750016.598,0Ryzen 3 1300X14.896,0Ryzen 3 2200G14.871,0Athlon 3000G14.629,0i5-2500K14.254,0Athlon 200GE13.585,0Ryzen 3 120012.560,00146.131

U prvom testu vidimo da 10700K ponešto zaostaje za konkurentom 3800 XT, a rezultat se ne okreće u njegovu korist ni kada je MCE uključen i procesor boosta na 5,1 GHz jer tada rezultat skače na 75.774. Zanimljivo je da 3700X koji je 8C/16T konfiguracije ovdje ipak znatnije zaostaje.

Blender BMW Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3950X121,8Ryzen 9 3900X157,4Ryzen 7 3800XT202,4Core i7-10700K218,4Ryzen R7 3700X233,0Ryzen 7 2700X264,8i7-8700K283,4Ryzen 7 1800X299,6Ryzen 7 2700301,5Core i5-10600K301,7Ryzen 5 3600X313,0Core i5-10400343,0Ryzen 5 2600X344,8i7-7800X355,1Core i5-10500357,5Ryzen 5 2600366,7i5-8600K406,6Ryzen 3 3300X436,1Ryzen 3 3100485,9Ryzen 5 2400G571,9Ryzen 3 2200G874,2Athlon 200GE1.320,2Athlon 3000G1.327,801.461

Idemo dalje, i ovdje je 3800XT opet brži, a 10700K se smjestio između njega i 3700X.

Cinebench 15Ryzen 9 3950X4.057,0Ryzen 9 3900X3.188,0Ryzen 7 3800XT2.230,0Ryzen 7 3700X2.137,0Core i7-10700K2.038,0i7-6950X1.864,0Ryzen 7 2700X1.828,0Ryzen 7 1800X1.624,0Ryzen 7 27001.588,0Ryzen 5 3600X1.582,0i7-8700K1.546,0Ryzen 7 1700X1.542,0Core i5-10600K1.415,0Ryzen 7 17001.403,0i7-5960X1.377,0Ryzen 5 2600X1.368,0Core i5-105001.332,0Core i5-104001.302,0Ryzen 5 26001.301,0i7-7800X1.264,0Ryzen 5 1600X1.241,0Ryzen 3 3300X1.133,0Ryzen 5 16001.129,0i7-5930K1.101,0i7-5820K1.074,0i5-8600K1.030,0Ryzen 3 31001.015,0i7-7700K989,0i7-6700K935,0Ryzen 5 2400G829,0Ryzen 5 1500X814,0Ryzen 5 1400703,0i5-6600K651,0i3-8100604,0i5-7500596,0Ryzen 3 2200G567,0Ryzen 3 1300X558,0Ryzen 3 1200482,0i3-7350K445,0Athlon 3000G377,0Athlon 200GE357,004.463

U starijem je Cinebenchu 10700K čak malo sporiji i od 3700X-a, dok je 3800XT još malo ispred njega.

Cinebench 20Ryzen 9 3950X9.265,0Ryzen 9 3900X7.237,0Ryzen 7 3800XT5.123,0Core i7-10700K4.936,0Ryzen 7 3700X4.916,0Ryzen 7 2700X3.857,0Core i5-10600K3.592,0Core i7-8700K3.408,0Ryzen 5 3600X3.369,0Core i5-104003.147,0Core i5-105003.055,0Ryzen 3 3300X2.583,0Ryzen 3 31002.340,0010.192

U novijem je Cinebenchu 10700K u malenoj prednosti ispred 3700X, ali ponešto zaostaje za 3800XT. Očito je kako je AMD s ovom novom XT generacijom malo zapaprio Intelu.

Corona 1.3 Benchmark (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3950X61,0Ryzen 9 3900X72,0Core i7-10700K96,0Ryzen 7 3800XT104,0Ryzen 7 3700X112,0Ryzen 7 2700X118,0Core i5-10600K134,0Core i7-8700K141,0Ryzen 5 3600X144,0Core i5-10500146,0Core i5-10400148,0Ryzen 3 3300X202,0Ryzen 3 3100233,00256

Corona Renderer je fotorealistični renderer dostupan za Autodeskov 3ds Max ili kao standalone CLI aplikacija. Razvija se i verzija za Maxon Cinemu 4D. Dostupan je i benchmark koji automatski renderira scenu i izbacuje rezultat u sekundama, te u Rays/sec.

Ovdje je 10700K ipak u prednosti ispred 3800XT i 3700X i to solidnoj.

HandbrakeRyzen 9 3900X69,6Ryzen 7 3800XT61,0Core i7-10700K52,7Core i7-8700K42,6Core i5-10600K41,3Core i5-1040039,6Core i5-1050038,9Ryzen 3 3300X34,1Ryzen 7 2700X32,2077

Ponovno je 3800XT uzvratio i dosta je brži od 10700K u transkodiranju videa.

JetStream 2 benchmark (score,više je bolje)Core i7-10700K161,3Ryzen 9 3900X156,0Ryzen 7 3800XT154,7Ryzen 3 3300X149,6Core i5-10600K148,7Core i5-10500141,5Core i7-8700K140,8Core i5-10400137,2Ryzen 3 3100127,10177

JetStream 2 je browser benchmark koji se fokusira na web aplikacije, koji kombinira JavaScript i Web Assembly benchmarke koji pokrivaju različite napredne poslove i tehnike programiranja te izbacuje rezultat na temelju toga. Veći broj znači bolje performanse, a ovdje je 10700K na samom vrhu, solidno brži od 3800XT.

Puget Systems Premiere Pro benchmark (score,više je bolje)Ryzen 9 3900X609,0Core i7-10700K541,5Ryzen 7 3800XT541,5Core i5-10600K439,5Core i5-10500433,0Core i7-8700K409,0Core i5-10400384,5Ryzen 3 3300X379,5Ryzen 3 3100349,00670

Puget Systems je američka tvrtka iz Seattlea koja se bavi gradnjom računala. U svom radu koriste nekoliko benchmarka kojima ocjenjuju brzinu radnih stanica pa tako i ovaj Adobe Premiere Pro benchmark.

Potpuno izjednačen rezultat za dva glavna konkurenta.

Puget Systems DaVinci Resolve 4K test (score,više je bolje)Ryzen 9 3950X748,0Ryzen 9 3900X732,0Ryzen 7 3800XT716,0Core i7-10700K693,0Core i5-10600K622,0Core i5-10500616,0Core i5-10400598,0Core i7-8700K582,0Ryzen 3 3300X549,0Ryzen 3 3100522,00823

U DaVinci testu je 10700K opet malo ispod 3800XT.

V-Ray Benchmark 1.0.8 (sekunde, manje je bolje)Ryzen 9 3950X36,0Ryzen R9 3900X46,0Ryzen 7 3800XT64,0Core i7-10700K65,0Ryzen 7 3700X69,0Core i5-10600K89,0Core i5-8700K91,0Ryzen 5 3600X93,0Core i5-10400101,0Core i5-10500104,0Ryzen 3 3300X122,0Ryzen 3 3100140,00154

V-Ray Benchmark je proizvod ChaosGroup-a koji je stand-alone aplikacija za mjerenje performansi procesora i grafike u renderiranju. Dostupan je za 3ds Max, Mayu, Cinemu 4D, Blender, SketchUp itd.

Samo sekundu je 10700K sporiji od 3800 XT, i to je još jedan dokaz da je AMD povukao dobar potez izbacivanjem XT serije.

wPrime 2.0Ryzen Threadripper 3970X23,9Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX31,6Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX38,6Ryzen 9 3950X42,4Ryzen Threadripper 2950X49,2Threadripper 1950X54,1Ryzen Threadripper 2920X56,1Threadripper 1920X62,6i7-6950X69,2Ryzen 7 3800XT80,1Ryzen R7 3700X82,8Core i7-10700K85,3Ryzen 7 2700X86,9Ryzen 7 1800X95,6i7-8700K103,9Ryzen 7 1700X106,9Ryzen 7 2700108,3i7-5960X110,6Ryzen 5 3600X113,3Ryzen 7 1700116,9Core i5-10600K118,7i7-7800X121,4Ryzen 5 2600X126,2Ryzen 5 2600126,8i7-4960X129,6Core i5-10500131,3Core i5-10400133,3i7-3960X135,1i7-5930K135,4Ryzen 5 1600X136,3i7-5820K138,7Ryzen 5 1600140,2i7-3930K149,9Ryzen 3 3300X158,6i5-8600K164,6i7-7700K167,4i7-6700K175,4i7-4790K176,0Ryzen 3 3100178,3i7-4770K186,5i7-3770K195,2Ryzen 5 1500X198,1i7-2600K213,5Ryzen 5 1400225,0FX-8150237,50261

Veliki graf s mnoštvom procesora i test u kojem je 10700K mrvicu sporiji od 3700X, a 3800XT mu bježi za solidnih 5 sekundi.