Intel Core i7-10700K recenzija

· · Procesori · Stranica 5 od 6

Rezultati testiranja – treći dio

Porast performansi overclockingom

PCMarkCore i7-10700K @ OC6.433,0Core i7-10700K6.346,007.076 Cinebench 15Core i7-10700K @ OC2.200,0Core i7-10700K2.038,002.420 Cinebench 20Core i7-10700K @ OC5.241,0Core i7-10700K4.936,005.765 CoronaCore i7-10700K @ OC90,0Core i7-10700K96,00106 V-RayCore i7-10700K @ OC61,0Core i7-10700K65,0072 wPrime v2.10Core i7-10700K @ OC78,6Core i7-10700K85,3094

Overclocking je značio porast takta sa 4,7 GHz na 5,1 GHz pri čemu su naravno sve jezgre bile pod opterećenjem. Donijelo je to kao što vidimo i lijep porast ukupnih performansi, a potrošnja je pri tome skočila sa 183 W na 230 W.

Memorijske performanse @ 3.600 MHz CL16

AIDA64 RAM ReadCore i7-10700K51.964,0Ryzen 3 3300X51.794,0Ryzen 7 3800XT51.406,0Core i5-10600K51.205,0Core i5-1050051.131,0Core i5-1040051.080,0Ryzen 3 310050.948,0057.160 AIDA64 RAM WriteCore i7-10700K52.089,0Core i5-10600K51.873,0Core i5-1050051.767,0Core i5-1040051.474,0Ryzen 3 310028.799,0Ryzen 3 3300X28.799,0Ryzen 7 3800XT27.798,0057.298 AIDA64 RAM CopyRyzen 7 3800XT49.047,0Ryzen 3 310047.833,0Ryzen 3 3300X47.758,0Core i7-10700K47.125,0Core i5-10600K45.223,0Core i5-1040043.124,0Core i5-1050043.081,0053.952 AIDA64 RAM LatencyCore i7-10700K43,6Core i5-1040046,7Core i5-1050046,9Core i5-10600K47,1Ryzen 3 3300X65,8Ryzen 7 3800XT67,8Ryzen 3 310070,3077

Izvrsne memorijske performanse s najnižim vremenom pristupa ostvario je Core i7-10700K – odlično.

Potrošnja sistema

Potrošnjai5-750092,0Ryzen 3 1200105,0Ryzen 5 1400113,0i7-6700K120,0Core i5-10500124,0Core i5-10400125,0Ryzen 3 1300X125,0Ryzen 5 1500X130,0Ryzen 5 1600132,0Ryzen 7 1700137,0i7-7700K138,0Ryzen 7 2700141,0Ryzen 3 3100146,0Ryzen 5 2600155,0Ryzen 7 3700X160,0Ryzen 5 3600X162,0Ryzen 7 1700X162,0Ryzen 3 3300X163,0Ryzen 5 1600X163,0i5-8600K165,0Core i5-10600K167,0Ryzen 5 2600X170,0Ryzen 7 1800X173,0Core i7-10700K183,0Ryzen 7 3800XT193,0Ryzen 9 3900X195,0i7-6950X196,0i7-8700K200,0Ryzen 7 2700X201,0i7-5820K205,0i7-5930K216,0i7-7800X225,0Ryzen 9 3950X230,00253

Potrošnja sistema je 183 W pri čemu Ryzen 7 3800XT troši samo 10 W više. Ove brojke ponajprije govore o učinkovitosti kojom rade novi AMD procesori (3800XT je nerijetko brži u multithreadingu) i napredak koji su postigli u iznimno kratkom vremenu. Ne zaboravimo, Core procesori se usavršavaju puno duže od Ryzena.

Zagrijavanje @ Noctua D15

TemperatureCore i5-1040058,0Core i5-1050068,0Ryzen 3 310069,6Core i5-10600K70,0Core i7-10700K71,0Ryzen 3 3300X74,9Ryzen 5 3600X77,3Ryzen 9 3900X78,7Ryzen 7 3700X81,3Ryzen 7 3800XT83,9092

Maksimalna temperatura na jednoj jezgri nakon opterećenja OCCT-ovim Large Data testom iznosi 71°C, a prosjek na svima je 66,4°C. Ovdje je teško uspoređivati dva konkurenta jer Ryzeni drugačije mjere temperaturu od Core procesora, no ono što smo primijetili je da su površinske temperature Noctue D15 vrlo slične.